1,731,165 research outputs found
Weber M., Économie et société.
Tréanton Jean-René. Weber M., Économie et société.. In: Revue française de sociologie, 1996, 37-4. p. 674
Weber M., The sociology of religion.
Séguy Jean. Weber M., The sociology of religion.. In: Revue française de sociologie, 1965, 6-1. p. 112
Weber M., Le savant et le politique.
Desroche H. Weber M., Le savant et le politique.. In: Revue française de sociologie, 1960, 1-1. pp. 118-119
The intersective ASCLT
In a recent work of the second named author on the Almost Sure
Central Limit Theorem (ASCLT), we showed the usefulness of the
concept of quasi-orthogonal system of random variables introduced
by Bellman and later developed by Kac, Salem and Zygmund.
In this paper, we propose an optimal formulation of the ASCLT
again by using this idea and new correlation inequalities for sums
of independent random variables. We also introduce and develop
the notion of “intersective ASCLT” by proving some new results
generalizing and improving substancially the classical formulation
of the ASCLT. Essential tools for this approach are correlation
inequalities recently developed by the first named author and some
extensions of these ones obtained in the present paper
Weber M., Essais sur la théorie de la science.
Karady Victor. Weber M., Essais sur la théorie de la science.. In: Revue française de sociologie, 1966, 7-3. Les changements en France. p. 411
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
