74,266 research outputs found

    Nomenclatural novelties in the Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) for the Flora of China

    No full text
    The revision of the family Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) for the Flora of China has demonstrated the need to formally publish the following 12 nomenclatural novelties: Acronema minus (M. F. Watson) M. F. Watson & Z. H. Pan, A. brevipedicellatum Z. H. Pan & M. F. Watson, Angelica sinensis var. wilsonii (H. Wolff) Z. H. Pan & M. F. Watson, Harrysmithia franchetii (M. Hiroe) M. L. Sheh, Heracleum candicans var. obtusifolium, (Wall. ex DC.) F. T. Pu & M. F. Watson, Hydrocotyle hookeri ssp. chinensis (Dunn ex R. H. Shan & S. L. Liou) M. F. Watson & M. L. Sheh, H. hookeri ssp. handelii (H. Wolff) M. F. Watson & M. L. Sheh, Libanotis grubovii (V. M. Vinogradova) M. L. Sheh & M. F. Watson, Ligusdcum likiangense (H. Wolff) F. T. Pu & M. F. Watson, L. nematophyllum (Pimenov & Kljuykov) F. T. Pu & M. F. Watson, L. nullivittatum, (K. T. Fu) F. T. Pu & M. F. Watson, Pleurospermum, bicolor (Franch.) C. Norman ex Z. H. Pan & M. F. Watson. In addition, a lectotype is designated for P. govanianum (DC.) Benth. ex C. B. Clarke var. bicolor Franch. (P. bicolor)

    Plumularia meretricia Watson 1973

    No full text
    Plumularia meretricia Watson, 1973 Figure 7D–F Plumularia meretricia Watson, 1973: 191, figs 61–74.— Watson, 2011: 71.— Bouillon et al., 2006: 370. Material examined. SAM H2536, one microslide. Near South Australia – Western Australia border, depth 180 m, trawl, coll: R. Southcott 1/07/1988. Description. Part of infertile branched colony, longest branch 10 mm. Hydrorhizal stolons tubular, perisarc thick, rugose. Stem, branch and hydrocladial internodes long, cylindrical, smooth, sometimes with transverse septa. Hydrocladia sub-alternate, apophysis short, strong, with inflated transverse distal node. First hydrocladial internode moderately long, usually deeply divided by two to five transverse segments ending in transverse distal node. When more than one hydrotheca on the hydrocladium, hydrothecate internodes are separated by a long cylindrical internode without internal septa. Hydrothecate internode short, hydrotheca occupying distal half, two incipient septa in base of internode and two above at base of hydrotheca. Hydrotheca deep bowl-shaped, margin circular, rim thin, not everted. FIGURE 7A–F. 7A–B. Synthecium elegans Allman, 1872. A, part of hydrocladium. B, hydrocladial internode and hydrothecae. 7C, Synthecium subventricosum Bale, 1914, hydrocladial internodes and hydrothecae. 7D–F, Plumularia meretricia Watson, 1973. D, part of branched stem. E, apophysis and branch hydrotheca. F, hydrotheca, anterior view, angle of view showing partly visible lateral nematothcae. Nematothecae all similar in shape and size, short, moveable, base robust, cup wide, circular, slightly adcaudally excavated. Median inferior set well back on hydrothecate internode, twin laterals not reaching hydrothecal margin, One nematotheca proximal on athecate internode, one or two cauline nematothecae (usually lost but marked by foramen on stem internode), one nematotheca in axil of stem and hydrocladium, and a prominent dome-shaped hydrostatic pore with circular orifice on apophysis. Perisarc of stem and branch thick, perisarc of hydrotheca thinning towards margin. Hydrorhiza, width 88–144 Stem width 96–104 Branch width 40–56 Hydrocladium first athecate internode length 80–144 succeeding athecate internode length 192–280 hydrothecate internode length 392–440 width at node 56–60 Hydrotheca abcauline wall, length 100–128 adcauline wall free length 40–48 width of margin (lateral view) 156–180 Nematotheca length of base 30–40 depth of cup 20–21 Remarks. This description of Plumularia meretricia supplements that of Watson (1973). The material is much damaged. Distribution. Eastern Great Australian Bight.Published as part of Watson, Jeanette E., 2018, Some Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the Great Australian Bight in the collection of the South Australian Museum, pp. 1-34 in Zootaxa 4410 (1) on pages 17-18, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4410.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/122117

    An experimental study on trailing edge crack detection for wind turbine blade using airfoil aerodynamic noise

    No full text
    Recent decades have witnessed more and more wind turbines (WTs) being installed onshore and offshore. Health condition monitoring for WTs structures and components is increasingly becoming a compelling concern for stable power output and operational safety of a wind farm [1]. Blade damages seem to occur with a higher probability ahead of other components (e.g., gearbox and generator) damages [2]. After reviewing traditional damage detection approaches and their limitations [3], in this research a new non-contactable approach to detecting trailing edge (TE) damages is proposed based on airfoil aerodynamic noise measurements using a microphone array. In the experiment, four changeable TE parts with rectangular cracks (damaged width W of 0.2mm, 0.5mm, 1.0mm and 2.0mm) for a NACA0018 airfoil (chord C=200mm, span L=400mm) are designed and an example with W=0.2mm is shown in Fig.(a). The TEs with cracks have the same solid thickness as the baseline one (h_solid=0.76mm, standard NACA0018 airfoil TE thickness with chord of 200mm) but different dimensions of total TE thickness (h=W+h_solid). A phased microphone array with 64 microphones is used for acoustic measurement then beamforming is applied to extract TE noise and source power integration is performed within a 200×200mm2 region centred at TE midpoint [4][5]. Fig.(b) shows sound pressure levels (SPLs) L_p at the integrated region of four damaged cases as well as baseline with the frequency resolution of 10Hz under the freestream velocity U of 35m/s and geometrical angle of attack (AoA) alpha of 0º. The cases with smaller cracks show less remarkable tonal peaks compared with the one of W=2.0mm (~4dB); when the crack size is smaller the spectral peak broadens. These peaks or humps are attributed to the periodic vortex shedding from blunt TEs. Fig.(c) shows the SPL differences Delta L_p between the damaged cases and baseline; frequency is normalized as TE-thickness-based Strouhal number St. Local maxima of Lp are present at approximately St = 0.1 [6]. In the experiment, it is difficult to extract the spectral peaks or humps if the effective AoA (alpha*) [6] is more than 2.40º because the boundary layer on suction side becomes thicker and the asymmetry of boundary layers prevents coherent and periodic vortex shedding [7]. In Fig.(d), the discrete points are the St at peak L_p (St_peak) versus the ratio of TE thickness and averaged displacement thickness of pressure and suction sides (overline delta *) extracted from available cases (U=15m/s, 20m/s, 25m/s, 30m/s and 35m/s); the grey and blue curves are obtained from models reported in [6] with solid angle (Psi) of 20º and 23.76º (baseline solid angle), respectively. The points of St_peak versus thickness ratio show a good agreement with the prediction model [6]. This means that particularly for smaller cracks at the first stage of damaged process, the effect of solid angle can be neglected and considered as a minor and adjunctive factor. The TE thickness retrieved through the application of the model can be used as a prediction of the damage level. Additional data obtained from experiments with turbulent inflow will be presented to assess if the approach proposed is still feasible in more realistic turbulent inflow conditions. Keywords: wind turbine blade; trailing edge crack; damage detection; aerodynamic noise. Images: Link: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/static.vcongress.de/cms/forwind/paper/417dd783-7a7c-424d-a4d3- 55ce31fa41e1.png Description: (a) An example of NACA0018 airfoil with a TE crack of 0.2mm. (b) SPLs with resolution of 10Hz (U=35m/s and alpha=0º). (c) Corresponding SPL differences compared with baseline case normalized as peak St. (d) Relations of peak St and thickness ratio: discrete points are the experimental date; grey and black curves are prediction models Brooks et al. proposed with solid angle of 20º and 23.76º. References: [1] Tautz-Weinert, J. and Watson, S.J., 2016. Using SCADA data for wind turbine condition monitoring–a review. IET Renewable Power Generation, 11(4), pp.382-394. [2] Yang, W., Peng, Z., Wei, K. and Tian, W., 2016. Structural health monitoring of composite wind turbine blades: challenges, issues and potential solutions. IET Renewable Power Generation, 11(4), pp.411-416. [3] Du, Y., Zhou, S., Jing, X., Peng, Y., Wu, H. and Kwok, N., 2020. Damage detection techniques for wind turbine blades: A review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 141, p.106445. [4] Merino-Martínez, R., Carpio, A.R., Pereira, L.T.L., van Herk, S., Avallone, F., Ragni, D. and Kotsonis, M., 2020. Aeroacoustic design and characterization of the 3D-printed, open-jet, anechoic wind tunnel of Delft University of Technology. Applied Acoustics, 170, p.107504. [5] Carpio, A.R., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., Snellen, M. and van der Zwaag, S., 2020. Quantitative criteria to design optimal permeable trailing edges for noise abatement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 485, p.115596. [6] Brooks, T.F., Pope, D.S. and Marcolini, M.A., 1989. Airfoil self-noise and prediction. [7] Moreau, D.J. and Doolan, C.J., 2016. Tonal noise production from a wall-mounted finite airfoil. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 363, pp.199-224

    Erratum to: Effect of moderate red wine intake on cardiac prognosis after recent acute myocardial infarction of subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Diabetic Medicine, (2006), 23, 9, (974-981), 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01886.x)

    No full text
    In an article by Marfella et al, the author name C. Saron is incorrect and should be listed as C. Sardu. Therefore the correct author list is: R. Marfella, F. Cacciapuoti, M. Siniscalchi, F. C. Sasso, F. Marchese, F. Cinone, E. Musacchio, M. A. Marfella, L. Ruggiero, G. Chiorazzo, D. Liberti, G. Chiorazzo, G. F. Nicoletti, C. Sardu, F. D'Andrea, C. Ammendola, M. Verza and L. Coppola.In an article by Marfella et al, the author name C. Saron is incorrect and should be listed as C. Sardu. Therefore the correct author list is: R. Marfella, F. Cacciapuoti, M. Siniscalchi, F. C. Sasso, F. Marchese, F. Cinone, E. Musacchio, M. A. Marfella, L. Ruggiero, G. Chiorazzo, D. Liberti, G. Chiorazzo, G. F. Nicoletti, C. Sardu, F. D'Andrea, C. Ammendola, M. Verza and L. Coppola

    James T. Watson and Gordon F. M. Rakita (eds.), Ancient Southwestern Mortuary Practices

    No full text
    James T. WATSON and Gordon F. M. RAKITA (eds.), Ancient Southwestern Mortuary Practices, University Press of Colorado, Louisville (CO), 2020, 303 p., bibliogr., index, ill. (black and white), maps, tabl., graph. ISBN: 978-1-64642-012-4 (hardcover)/978-1-64642-013-1 (ebook)

    [Memo from Lieutenant Colonel M. F. Hass, Civil Affairs Division, with amendments to an evacuation proposal]

    No full text
    A memorandum sent form Lieutenant General M. F. Hass, Civil Affairs Division, which has two corrections from a an evacuation proposal originally sent on May 13, 1942. The correction changes the destination to the Merced Assembly Center.The War Relocation Authority (WRA), together with the Wartime Civil Control Administration (WCCA), the Civil Affairs Division (CAD) and the Office of the Commanding General (OFG) of the Western Defense Command (WDC) operated together to segregate and house some 110,000 men women and children from 1942 to 1945. The collection contains documents and photographs relating to the establishment and administrative workings of the (WDC), the (WRA) and the (WCCA) for the year 1942

    Filellum conopeum Watson 2003

    No full text
    Filellum conopeum Watson, 2003 Filellum conopeum Watson, 2003: 159 –160, figs. 9 a–c. Type series. Holotype— Filellum conopeum Watson, 2003, malinol-mounted microslide, sparse fertile colony on stem of Acryptolaria patagonica (NMV F 91342) (Watson 2003: 159). Type locality. From the holotype, off Macquarie Island (53 ˚ 55.8´S– 53 ˚ 55.7´S; 159 ˚ 5.5´E– 159 ˚ 4.7´E), 453 m, (Watson 2003). Description. See Watson (2003: 159–160). Distribution. Filellum conopeum is known only from its original description, off Macquarie Island (53 ˚ 55.8´– 53 ˚ 55.7´S; 159 ˚ 5.5´– 159 ˚ 4.7´E) (Watson 2003). Remarks. Filellum conopeum was described by Watson (2003: 159) as bearing “Hydrothecae stolonal […]. Proximal quarter to one third of hydrotheca adnate to stolon, dorsal abcauline wall furrowed by many close, sharpedged ridges with minute ragged frill of perisarc; ridges fading on adnate wall. Adnate wall becoming free at a sharp upward bend, free part cylindrical or weakly expanding from bend to margin, free part straight to broadly curved, walls smooth, occasionally with several regenerations. Margin circular, transverse, with smooth, distinctly everted rim. Perisarc of walls fairly thick, thinning distally. Hydranth with c. 12 tentacles and clavate hypostome”. Trophosome features of F. conopeum are found in other species of the genus, such as F. serratum, F. a n t a rc t i c u m or F. magnificum, so they alone do not allow a proper identification of the species, although F. mangnificum differs from Watson’s species by the distinctly larger hydrothecae, particularly in relation to the diameter of the hydrothecal aperture. As with other species of the genus, truly diagnostic characters of F. conopeum are based on features of the coppiniae: “Coppinia bud-shaped, c. 1 mm wide and 1 mm high, comprising many tightly packed gonothecae enclosed within a cone of protective nematophorous tubules. Gonotheca flask-shaped (lateral view), base rounded, body expanding a little from base to shoulder then narrowing into a short straight or slightly curved neck tapering to a circular aperture; in transverse view gonothecae polygonal. Nematophorous tubules similar in length, not forked, conjoined just above gonothecae then becoming free, most narrowing distally and inwardly curved to meet above gonotheca; terminal orifice circular. Perisarc of gonothecae and tubes moderately thick; perisarc of tubes somewhat roughened. Planulae enclosed in gonothecae small, spherical.” (Watson 2003: 160). The general structure of the coppinia of this species resembles that of F. a n t a rc t i c u m and F. magnificum, in which the defensive tubes are situated on the periphery of the mass of gonothecae, like a fence, arching over the gonothecae (in F. magnificum the defensive tubes also arise among the gonothecae). They are different, however, because the gonothecae lack a distal neck in F. antarcticum, and have a short, clearly differentiated distal neck with an everted rim in F. magnificum. In Watson’s species, however, the “body expanding a little from base to shoulder then narrowing into a short straight or slightly curved neck tapering to a circular aperture”. Although Watson did not give measurements of the gonothecal neck, this seems distinctly longer in general and variable in shape. The cnidome of F. conopeum is unknown and, therefore, no comparison concerning this character can be made.Published as part of Marques, Antonio C., Peña, Álvaro L., Miranda, Thaís P. & Migotto, Alvaro E., 2011, Revision of the genus Filellum Hincks, 1868 (Lafoeidae, Leptothecata, Hydrozoa), pp. 1-28 in Zootaxa 3129 on pages 11-12, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20678

    Indolestes obiri Watson & Moulds 1979

    No full text
    Indolestes obiri * Watson sp. n. (Figs 3, 4, 11, 34-37) Indolestes sp. “o ”; Watson, 1974: 142. Types— Holotype ♂, Northern Territory: 12°23'S 132 ° 56'E, Cannon Hill, 7 km NW by N o f Cahill’s Crossing, East Alligator River, 27-28.v. 1973, J. A. L. W atson (ANIC Type No. 9877) (in ANIC). Paratypes: Northern Territory: one ♀, 11 °59 'S 133 °05 ' E, 5 km S by W of Tor Rock, 5.vi. 1973, T. Weir; one ♀, 12°16 'S 133°13 'E, Birraduk Crfeek, 18 km E by N of Oenpelli, 4.vi. l973, T. Weir; one ♀, 12°18 ' S 133°17 'E, 15 km SW by S of Nimbuwah Rock, 10-ll. xi.1972, J. A. L. Watson; one ♂, one ♀, 12°22 ' S 133°01 'E, 6 km SW by S of Oenpelli, 6.vi. 1973, T. Weir and A. Allwood ; three ♂♂, three ♀♀, same locality as holotype, 12-13.xi.1972, J. A. L. Watson; six ♂♂, four ♀♀, same data as holotype; one ♀. same locality as holotype, 27. V.1973, T. Weir and N. Forrester; one ♂, 12°25 'S 132°57 ' E, Oberie (= Obiri) Rock, 2 km N N W of Cahill’s Crossing, East Alligator River, 29-30.v. 1973, J. A. L. Watson; one ♂, 12°50 ' S 132 °52 ' E, Baroalba Gorge, 19 km E by N of M t Cahill, 8.iii. 1973, J. A. L. W atson; one ♂, 12°52' S 132 ° 47'E, Nourlangie Creek, 8 km E of Mt Cahill, 17-18.xi.1972, J. A. L. W atson; four ♂♂, one ♀, 12°52 ' S 132 ° 50' E, Koongarra, 15 km E of Mt Cahill, 24-25. V. 1973, J. A. L. Watson; four ♂♂, 12°55' S 132°56' E, Lightning Dreaming Gorge, 25 km E by S of Mt Cahill, 12. vi.1973, T. Weir. One paralectotype ♀ of Austrolestes albicauda tindalei, from Groote Eylandt, N. B. Tindale (SAM), appears to be a very pale specimen of I. obiri. However, it is not to be regarded as a paratype of I. obiri. Male A sombre-coloured species, with pale brown and dull metallic green head and thorax, dark brown and cream abdomen. * obiri, for Obiri (Oberie) Rock, a habitat of this cave-haunting lestid; to be treated as an indeclinable noun. Head.—Labium yellowish; labrum and anteclypeus pale greenish brown, slightly darkened on either side of midline; mandibles and genae pale greenish brown; postclypeus pale brown, slightly and variably darkened, approximately central spot on each side; frons pale brown in front, dark greenish on top with pale middorsal stripe, forming pale T-shaped mark and upper part of anterior frons, sometimes obscured; vertex dark greenish, with pale brown ring around median ocellus, sometimes obscured, pale brown crescents beside and behind each lateral ocellus, meeting in midline, and pale spot behind each antenna; occiput pale brownish in midline, along postocellar suture, and occipital margin, leaving broad, irregular triangular green spot adjacent to eye; back o f head pale brown, except for dark green upper parts of postgenae, bordering eyes; scape dark brown, pedicel dark brown in front, pale brown behind, basal segment of flagellum pale brown, darkened apically, rest o f flagellum black. Prothorax pale brown; median and posterior lobes with variable, dark green spots on either side of broad middorsal pale stripe; upper episternum and epimeron marked dark brown; coxa and trochanter pale yellowish brown, spinose inner surfaces of femur and tibia tinged dark brown; tarsi shaded dark brown. Synthorax (Fig. 3) pale brown, m arked darker as follows; collar dark brown; a dark line on each side of dorsal carina, sometimes fused with greenish band extending across mesanepisternum from collar to dark antealar ridge and sinus, which is extended towards mesopleural suture near its centre, and over its upper quarter; a shadowing along mesopleural suture from large upper dark spot to dark spot at angle of suture; a diagonal, trilobed dark green band across mesepimeron, from mesopleural suture to upper middle lateral suture; dark stripe below subalar ridge continuing into triangular patch on metanepisternum, prolonged into dark brown line reaching almost to lower end of upper metapleural suture; a variable dark brown line along upper posterior corner o f metepimeron, adjacent to poststernum; black spot on either side of poststernum; sterna apparently dark brown and yellowish brown, a dark brown midventral stripe extending across metapostcoxales. Coxae and trochanters yellowish; femora and tibiae pale brown, lined dark brown between rows of spines; tarsi pale brown, darkened distally, claws blackish. Wings.—Average length of hind wing 22.34 mm (range 21.1-23.1 mm, N = 10); hyaline, most veins dark brown, R + M and R 1pale brown; pterostigma pale brown, that of fore wing averaging 1.368 mm long (range 1.28-1.40 mm), 0.566 mm wide (range 0.54-0.62 mm) (N = 10). Abdomen (Fig. 11).—Tergite 1 pale brown, darker at extreme base and over distal third, posterior transverse carina dark brown; tergite 2 mainly dark brown above, with pale basal band continuing into pale lateral margin, broken middorsally by narrow dark line on either side of light middorsal stripe, and with illdefined pale transverse band approximately two-thirds o fsegment from base, connecting pale lateral areas at narrowest point of brown dorsal mark to dilatation of middorsal stripe; tergites 3-6 dark brown marked creamy white, the pale m arks increasingly obscured in the more posterior segments—a whitish basal band, broken above by fine dark line on each side of middorsal pale line, and broad whitish transverse band, expanded below, shading from brown approximately two-thirds of segment length from base in middorsal line, ending abruptly at dark brown band occupying distal 20% o f tergite; tergite 7 similar in pattern to tergites 3-6, the pale areas variably obscured, sometimes only basal band and lateral whitish patch evident; tergite 8 dark brown, with or without pale lateral spot just basal to midpoint o f segment; tergite 9 dark brown; segment 10 whitish, with dark brown posterior margin and variable basal dark brown band sometimes expanded at sides (Fig. 11), more commonly narrow, broadest middorsally. Sternite 1 very pale brown; secondary genitalia pale and dark brown; sternites 3-7 with colour patterns matching those of corresponding tergites; sternite 8 dark brown, with pale patch on each side in distal half; sternite 9 pale brown. Anal appendages (Figs 34-37).—Superior appendages averaging 1.350 mm long (range 1.30-1.42 mm, N = 10); basal quarter to third pale, apices dark brown; armature almost concealed in dorsal view, comprising ventral, backwardly curved spine bearing apical pencil of setae, and connected by low ridge to slim medioventral spine, the tip o fformer 0.67-0.75 x, o flatter0.34-0.39 x appendage length from base. Interior appendages rounded, pale brown, margined darker brown. Female Size as in male, hind wing averaging 22.49 mm long (range 21.6-23.2 mm), fore wing pterostigma 1.370 mm (range 1.30-1.42 mm) x 0.584 mm (range 0.54-0.62 mm) (N = 9), the abdomen stockier and shorter than in male, segments 8-9 swollen. Colour and pattern as in male, but dark markings, particularly of synthorax, less extensive (Fig. 4), and in female from G roote Eylandt much less extensive and paler, as in I. alleni; middorsal pale stripe on tergite 3 ofalmost uniform width, not distended into pale spot; whitish bands on tergites 3-6 less well defined than in male, the subapical band narrower; tergites 8- 9 sometimes showing dark middorsal line and apical band, the adjacent areas slightly paler brown, the lateral parts of tergite pale brown. Habitat All but one of the known specimens of I. obiri were taken along the Arnhem Land escarpment and its outliers, where the damselflies frequent shallow caves and overhangs. The breeding grounds are unknown, although a male was taken, apparently on territory, over the upper floodwaters of Baroalba Creek in March 1973.Published as part of J. A. L. Watson & M. S. Moulds, 1979, New Species of Australian Lestidae (Odonata), pp. 143-155 in Australian Journal of Entomology 18 on pages 152-154, DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1979.tb00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/369960

    Return on Investment in Public Relations: A critical assessment of concepts used by practitioners from the perspectives of communication and management sciences

    No full text
    Return on Investment (ROI) is a term commonly and non-specifically used by public relations practitioners when discussing the value to be created from communication activities. It mimics business language, particularly from business administration and financial management, but does not figure widely in academic discourse (Watson, 2005). Although the Institute for Public Relations [now CIPR] undertook a review of ROI practice in the United Kingdom (IPR/CDF 2004) and Likely, Rockland & Weiner (2006) proposed variations of ROI as alternatives to the discredited Advertising Value Equivalence (AVEs) measure of value creation, there has been little discussion other than Macnamara (2007) and Gregory and Watson (2008). This paper gives an overview on the views of ROI in public relations literature and concepts used by agencies and providers of measurement services. It reports on survey research amongst practitioners in several European countries on identifying the economic value of public relations. The findings are compared with the concepts of ROI used in business and accounting literature (Weber and Schäffer, 2006; Drury, 2007). Applied theory and parameters for the development of measurement and evaluation techniques are proposed. The paper concludes that the use of the term ROI in public relations needs a proper foundation in overriding management theory; otherwise PR theory and practice will discredit themselves

    Corrigendum to “Presence and function of kisspeptin/KISS1R system in swine ovarian follicles” (Theriogenology (2018) 115 (1–8), (S0093691X1830147X), (10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.04.006))

    No full text
    The authors regret the following changes to the author group G. Basinia, F. Grassellia, S. Bussolatia, R. Ciccimarraa, M. Maranesib, A. Bufalarib, C. Dall'Agliob, F. Parilloc,#, M. Zeranib,c,*. a Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Università di Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy. b Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Perugia, 06126 Perugia Italy. c Scuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università di Camerino, 62024 Matelica Italy. # Deceased. * Corresponding author: tel.: +39 0755857642; fax +39 0755857654. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Zerani). And to the acknowledgements and figures
    corecore