1,721,569 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Oberthueria jiatongae Zolotuhin & Xing Wang, sp. nov.
Oberthueria jiatongae Zolotuhin & Xing Wang, sp. nov. Obertheria [sic!] formosibia Kishida & Xing Wang (2011: 138, pl. 30, fig. 14). Type material. Holotype: ♂, “ China, prov. Shaanxi | Taibaishan Mts (S) | Tsinling Mts., Foping NT | 33 ˚ 51 ’N, 107 ˚ 57 ’E, 1.500 m | 20.IV– 11.V 1999 | leg. Sinjaev & Plutenko” (MWM); Paratypes: 38 ♂, 1 ♀, China, prov. Shaanxi, [Qinling Mountains, Taibaishan] Taibaishan Mts (S), Tsinling Mts., Foping NT, 33 ˚ 51 ’N, 107 ˚ 57 ’E, 1.500 m, 20.IV– 11.V 1999, leg. Sinjaev & Plutenko (MWM); 4 ♂, China, Shaanxi prov., [Qinling Mountains, Taibaishan] Tai bai shan Mts (S), Tsinling Mts, Houzhenzi, 33 ˚ 51 ’N, 107 ˚ 49 ’E, 1600 m, 27.V–08.VI 1999, leg. local collector (MWM); 6 ♂, same data but May 2002 (MWM); 3 ♂, the same data but June 1999 (MWM); ♂, same data but summer 1999 (MWM); ♂, same data but 1–12.VIII 1999 (MWM); ♂, same data but 1.500 m, VII 2001 (MWM); ♂, same data but 2.600 m, VII 2001, leg. local collector (MWM); ♂, China, Shaanxi prov., Taibaishan Nat. Park, 33 ˚ 35 ’N, 107 ˚ 43 ’E, 1300–1500 m, 20.VIII– 4.IX 1998, leg. V. Murzin & V. Sinjaev (MWM); 2 ♂, China, Shaanxi prov., South Taibaishan, Tsinling Mts., Houzhenzi, 33 ˚ 51 ’N, 107 ˚ 49 ’E, 1.500 m, 05– 10.V 2000, leg. Sinjaev & Plutenko (MWM); 2 ♂, China, Shaanxi prov., Dabashan, 15 km S Shou-Man vill., 1800 m, 32 ˚08’N, 108 ˚ 37 ’E, 25.V– 14.VI 2000, leg. Sinjaev & Plutenko (MWM). Additional material: 2 ♂, China, Jiangxi Prov., Wuyishan, Xipaihe vill., 1500 m, 27 ˚ 54 ’N, 112 ˚ 20 ’E, VII 2004, leg. Sinjaev & his team (MWM); 3 ♂, China, Hubei Prov., Dabashan, Songluohe, 31 ˚ 37 ’N, 110 ˚ 33 ’E, 1300–1800 m, V 2006, leg. Siniaev & his team (MWM); 2 ♂, China, N-Hubei Prov.e, Niutou Mt, Ahiyan, 1550 m, VIII 2000, leg. native collector (MWM); 2 ♂, China, Sichuan Prov., Wolong Nature Reserve, 31 ˚09’N, 103 ˚ 20 ’E, V 2005, leg. Sinjaev & his team (MWM); 2 ♂, China, Sichuan Prov., Qingchenghoushan Mts, 70 km NW Chengdu, 1400 m, 21–25.VIII 2005, leg. S., V., M. Murzin (MWM); ♂, China, NW-Sichuan Prov., Daxueshan Mts, Gonggashan, NW Moxi, 29 ˚ 41 ’N, 101 ˚ 58 ’E, 14– 19.VII 1999, leg. Sinjaev & Plutenko (MWM); ♂, China, Hainan Prov., Diaoluoshan National Nature Reserve, 2004. IV. 24, leg. Huang G.H. (SCAU); ♂, China, Hunan Province, Badagongshan National Nature Reserve, Tianpingshan Mountain, 2009. V. 27, leg. Huang G.H. (HUNAU); ♂, the same data but 2009. VIII. 10, leg. Wang H.S. (SCAU); ♂, China, Guangxi Province, Huaping National Nature Reserve, 2007. V. 25, leg. Chen L.S. & Wu G.Y. (SCAU); 39 ♂, 3 ♀, China, Guangdong Province, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 2011. VI. 4–5, 1300 m, leg. Wang X. & Huang G.H. (HUNAU); ♂, the same data but 2003. VI. 22, leg. Huang G.H. (SCAU); ♂, the same data but 2003. VIII. 16–20 (SCAU); ♂, ♀, the same data but 2003. VII. 16, leg. Chen L.S. & Lin H. (SCAU); ♂, the same data but 2008. VI. 25, leg. Wang H.S. (SCAU); ♂, the same data but 2008. VII. 2 (SCAU); 2 ♂, the same data but 2009. VIII. 10 (SCAU); 4 ♂, the same data but 2008. V. 31, leg. Wang M. & Wang H.S. (SCAU); 2 ♂, the same data but 2008. VII. 29, leg. Long Y. (SCAU); 6 ♂, the same data but 2009. V. 8, leg. Li X.P. (SCAU); 7 ♂, the same data but 2009. V. 18, leg. Wang H.S. & Long Y. (SCAU). Description. Medium-sized species (Figs 14–17), very similar externally to O. yandu and probably close to it. Ground colour sandy yellow, with abundant white or ash grey suffusion giving to moths a characteristic appearance. Wing pattern dark grey, prominent, submarginal field of the fore wing is covered with dark yellowbrown to chestnut scales whereas in hind wing it is brighter dark yellow to ochre-yellow. Wing serration distinct in hind wing, but marginal teeth are short and massive, forming sometimes very short bifurcate tail; in fore wing, medial projection may be double and the falcate part is smooth. Female similarly patterned, a bit darker, with the same kind of serration and a short bifurcate tail. Male genitalia (Fig. 26). Uncus lobes curved, lyre-shaped, with rounded apices; valvae short and broad; harpe strong, rather short and covered with dense spines on its distal third; right apical spur rather slender and pointed. Female genitalia as illustrated (Fig. 28). Diagnosis. Small size, contrasting ‘grey-scaled’ coloration, prominent wing pattern and short but distinct wing serration makes identification of the species rather easy. From the similar and sometimes sympatric O. yandu it differs being paler, a bit smaller, with shorter wing serration. Bionomics. The population of the species of the type locality is native to montaine forests where it inhabits altitudes of 1300–2600 m but more commonly 1500–1800 m, and is on the wing from late April to early September, develops 1–2 generation(s) depending on the altitude. Lowland populations (of Hunan, Guangdong, Hainan) are known develop two generations per season and is known from May to August. Distribution (Fig. 34). Mountains of Shaanxi, Jiangxi, Hubei, also known from N and NW Sichuan, Hunan, Guangdong and Hainan. PLATE 4. Figs 30–33. Biotopes. 30. Biotopes of O. yandu Zolotuhin & Xing Wang, sp. nov., China, Sichuan Prov., Erlangshan Mts, E Luding, 2560 m. 31. Biotopes of O. yandu Zolotuhin & Xing Wang, sp. nov., China, N. Sichuan Prov., near Lixian County, 2.100 m. 32. Biotopes of O. lunwan Zolotuhin & Xing Wang, sp. nov., China, NW Yunnan, Lijiang/Zhongdian, near Tuguancun, 3.200 m. 33. the same (all photos: A. Saldaitis).Published as part of Zolotuhin, Vadim V. & Wang, Xing, 2013, A taxonomic review of Oberthueria Kirby, 1892 (Lepidoptera, Bombycidae: Oberthuerinae) with description of three new species, pp. 465-478 in Zootaxa 3693 (4) on pages 474-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3693.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/21740
Polypedilum (Tripodura) bilamella Zhang & Wang, sp. n.
Polypedilum (Tripodura) bilamella Zhang & Wang sp. n. (Figure 4) Polypedilum (Tripodura) pullum (Zettstedt), sensu Wang, 2000: 646. Type material. Holotype (BDN. 10066), male, CHINA, Xizang Autonomous Region, Ya’dong County, Yacheng, 26. VIII. 2003, light trap, H. Xue. Paratypes: 1 male, Hubei Province, Shengnongjia Natural Conversation, Hongping, 1800m, 18. VII. 1997, light trap, Y. Du. 3 males, Sichuan Province, Guanxian County, 11. VII. 1985, light trap, X. Wang. 3 males, Sichuan Province, Luding County, 7. VI. 1996, light trap, X. Wang. 6 males, Sichuan Province, Kangding County, Zheduo River, 2120m, light trap, 8. VI. 1996, X. Wang. 3 males, Sichuan Province, Yajiang County, Sandaoqiao, 2460m, 9. VI. 1996, sweep net, X. Wang. 8 males, Sichuan Province, Xiangcheng County, Shuoqu River, 2750m, 12. VI. 1996, light trap, X. Wang. 3 males, Sichuan Province, Garzê County, Yajiang, 2830m, 14. VI. 1996, light trap, X. Wang. 1 male, Sichuan Province, Kangding County, Wasigou, 2000m, light trap, 15. VI. 1996, X. Wang. 2 males, Sichuan Ya’an City, Zhougong River, 18. VI. 1996, light trap, X. Wang. 6 males, Sichuan Province, Baoxing County, Xilong Town, 1100m, 19. VI. 1996, light trap, X. Wang. 4 males, Yunnan Province, Dali City, Diancangshan, 2520m, 23, V. 1996, light trap, B. Wang. 3 males, Yunnan Province, Eryuan County, Niujie Township, Futianlin, Meici River, 2262m, light trap, 24. V. 1996. C. Zhou. 1 male, Shannxi Province, Zhouzhi County, Banfangzi Town, 10. VIII 1994, W. Bu. 1 male, Shannxi Province, Ningshan County, Xunyangba, 16. VIII. 1994, sweep net, B. Wen. 5 males, Gansu Province, Yuzhong County, Xinlong Mountain, 2200m, 30–31. VII. 1993, sweep net, W. Bu. 1 male, Gansu Province, Yuzhong County, Maxian Mountain, 5. VIII. 1993, sweep net, W. Bu. 1 male, Gansu Province, Yongdeng County, Liancheng Township, Tulugou, 2300m, 16. VIII. 1993, light trap, W. Bu. 13 males, Ningxia Autonomous Region, Liuban Mountain Natural Converse, 6. VIII. 1987, X. Wang. Etymology. From Latin, bi, two and lamella, lamella, thin plate, referring to the anal point with two dorsal lobed lamellae. Diagnostic characters. Wing is full of gray marking. Anal point bears tow dosal lobed lamellae. Lateral projection of anal point is well developed. Male imago (n= 20). Total length 2.10–3.60, 2.89 mm. Wing length 1.43–2.10, 1.78 mm. Total length/ wing length 1.39–1.88, 1.63. Wing length/ length of profemur 2.17–2.82, 2.56. Coloration. Head dark brown. Thorax yellowish brown to dark brown. Legs yellowish brown to brown, femora with pale sub-apical ring. Abdominal segments yellowish brown to brown. Head. AR 0.40–0.73, 0.54. Ultimate flagellomere 90–410, 250 µm long. Temporal setae 10 –14, 12; including 2 –4, 3 inner verticals; 4 –8, 5 outer verticals and 2 –6, 4 postorbitals. Clypeus with 13 –27, 19 setae. Tentorium 100– 150, 118 µm long; 20 –35, 26 µm wide. Palpomere lengths (in µm): 28 –50, 37; 30 –48, 38; 75 –113, 96; 90–128, 109; 173–228, 192. Wing (Figure 4 A). Wing widely coved with obscure markings. VR 1.19–1.35, 1.29. R with 14 –25, 20 setae; R 1 with 11 –20, 15; R 4 + 5 with 22 –38, 29. Squama with 6 –16, 10 setae. Thorax. Dorsocentrals 17 –24, 20, including 2 –4, 3 humerals; acrostichals 13 –22, 18; prealars 4 –7, 5. Scutellum with 12 –28, 18 setae. Legs. Terminal scale (Figure 4 B) of front tibia 33 –55, 44 µm long, triangular and apically pointed. Spur of middle tibia 40 –65, 49 um long including 20 –33, 26 µm long comb, un-spurred comb 18 –28, 23 µm long, spur of hind tibia 40 –65, 52 µm long including 25 –40, 30 µm long comb, un-spurred comb 23 –38, 28 µm long. Width at apex of front tibia 40 –53, 46 µm, of middle tibia 43 –65, 51 µm, of hind tibia 45 –70, 59 µm. Lengths (in µm) and proportions of legs as in Table 1. Hypopygium (Figure 4 C–E). Anal tergite bands fused basal. Tergite IX with 6 –18, 10 median setae. Laterosternite with 2 –3, 2 setae. Anal point 53 –88, 72 µm long, lateral projection 13 –33, 22 µm long. Phallapodeme 65 –100, 89 µm long; transverse sternapodeme 25 –53, 42 µm long. Gonocoxite 103–163, 136 µm long. Superior volsella (Figure 4 C) pad–like, expanded distally, with 5–6 short inner setae and 2–3 long apical setae. Inferior volsella 95–140, 120 µm long, with 8 –13, 11 setae. Gonostylus 120–193, 164 µm long, with 5–7 long setae along inner margin. HR 0.69–0.92, 0.83. HV 1.53–1.94, 1.77. Distribution. It was collected from both Palaearctic and Oriental China. Remarks. The present new species is very close to P. (T.) decematoguttatum (Tokunaga), P. (T.) napahaiense Zhang & Wang sp. n. and P. (T.) mengmanense Zhang & Wang sp. n. in male hypopygial morphology that the anal point bears two dorsal lobed lamellae. We must be very careful when we observe above 4 species under microscope, because the dorsal lobed lamellae is transparent and easy to ignore in dorsal view. The above 4 species show a bit difference in wing markings and the length of lateral projection of anal point; Song et al. (2016) have certified these bit differences can result in inter-specific divergence by molecular data. Wang (2000) had wrongly identified some specimens of P. (T.) bilamella Zhang & Wang sp. n. collected from Ningxia Autonomous region as P. (T.) pullum (Zetterstedt).Published as part of Zhang, Ruilei, Song, Chao, Qi, Xin & Wang, Xinhua, 2016, Taxonomic review on the subgenus Tripodura Townes (Diptera: Chironomidae: Polypedilum) from China with eleven new species and a supplementary world checklist, pp. 1-53 in Zootaxa 4136 (1) on pages 10-12, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4136.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/39978
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Macrosemia fengi Wang sp. nov. from Yunnan and Guizhou, China (Hemiptera, Cicadidae, Cicadinae)
The genus Macrosemia Kato, 1925 (Hemiptera, Cicadidae, Cicadinae, Dundubiini, Dundubiina) currently includes 16 species (excluding subspecies and varieties), mainly occurring in the Oriental Region. More than half of them, 10 species, are known from China, including one new species, described in the present study.A new species of cicada, Macrosemia fengi Wang sp. nov., is described from Yunnan and Guizhou, southwest China. Colour plates are presented to illustrate its diagnostic characters. The distribution map of the new species is also given
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
