1,721,101 research outputs found
A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China
Chen, Xiaolin, Zhou, Libing, Wang, Shaojun, Li, Zhiwen, Li, Jie (2011): A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China. Zootaxa 3014: 59-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20739
FIGURES 1–8 in A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China
FIGURES 1–8. Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) incisa (Walker, 1861). 1.Adult in lateral view; 2.Wing; 3.Scutum in dorsal view; 4.Abdomen in dorsal view; 5.Head in lateral view; 6.Head in frontal and lateral view; 7.Epandrium, circus and surstylus in posterior view; 8.Epandrium, circus and surstylus in lateral viewPublished as part of Chen, Xiaolin, Zhou, Libing, Wang, Shaojun, Li, Zhiwen & Li, Jie, 2011, A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China, pp. 59-64 in Zootaxa 3014 on page 61, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20739
FIGURES 9–16 in A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China
FIGURES 9–16. Bactrocera (Bactrocera) paradiospyri Chen, Zhou et Li, sp. nov. 9.Adult in lateral view; 10.Wing; 11.Scutum in dorsal view; 12.Abdomen in dorsal view; 13.Head in frontal view; 14.Head in dorsal view; 7.Epandrium, circus and surstylus in posterior view; 8.Epandrium, circus and surstylus in lateral view.Published as part of Chen, Xiaolin, Zhou, Libing, Wang, Shaojun, Li, Zhiwen & Li, Jie, 2011, A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China, pp. 59-64 in Zootaxa 3014 on page 62, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20739
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Bactrocera Macquart 1835
Bactrocera Macquart, 1835 Bactrocera Macquart, 1835: 452. Type-species: B. longicornis Macquart, 1835, by monotypy. Dasyneura Saunders, 1842: 60. Type-species: D. zonata Saunders, 1942, by monotypy. Strumeta Walker, 1856: 33. Type-species: S. conformis Walker, 1856 [= Dacus umbrosus Fabricius, 1805], by monotypy. Chaetodacus Bezzi, 1913: 93. Type-species: Musca ferruginea Fabricius, 1794 [= Dacus dorsalis Hendel, 1912], by original designation. Marquesadacus Malloch, 1932: 145 (as subgenus of Dacus). Type-species: Chaetodacus perfuscus Aubertin, 1929, by monotypy. Apodacus Perkins, 1939: 26. Type-species: A. cheesmani Perkins, 1939 [= A. cheesmnae Perkins, 1939], by original designation. Aglaodacus Munro, 1984: 25, Type-species: A. nesiotes Munro, 1984, by original designation. Mauritidacus Munro, 1984: 25. Type-species: M. montyanus Munro, 1984, by original designation. This genus is closely related to Dacus Fabricius, but chiefly differs from the latter by the abdominal tergites not fused. A total more than 500 species are known from the Oriental, Pacific and Australian Regions except for B. oleae (Rossi, 1790) occurring in southern Europe. In addition, a few of adventives species are found in Hawaii and South America.Published as part of Chen, Xiaolin, Zhou, Libing, Wang, Shaojun, Li, Zhiwen & Li, Jie, 2011, A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China, pp. 59-64 in Zootaxa 3014 on pages 59-60, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20739
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Bactrocera (Bactrocera) paradiospyri Chen, Zhou et Li, sp. nov.
Bactrocera (Bactrocera) paradiospyri Chen, Zhou et Li, sp. nov. Description. Male. length of body 7.2–8.2mm; length of wing 7.0– 7.8mm. Head (Fig 13–14). Frons fulvous to black, with obscure black mark at anteromedial portion and small black spots at bases of frontal and orbital setae, length about 1.84 times width, 1.25 times as wide as eye. Lunule black. Ocellar triangle black, vertex fuscous to black. Face fuscous to black, with vague darker oblong spot in antennae groove; Parafacial entirely fulvous; genae fulvous to fuscous. Occiput black with fulvous along eye margin; occipital row absent. Antennae with segments 1 and 2 fuscous (segment 3 broken in both two specimens). Head setae black: two pairs of frontals and one pair of orbitals; one pair of medial vertical, lateral vertical and genal setae. Thorax. Scutum (Fig 11) completely black with 2 vague grayish white submedian vittae extending from anterior margin to before a level of postalar setae. Postpronotal lobes yellow. Pleura predominantly black with following yellow areas: notopleural callus, anepisternal stripe, anatergite and katatergite. Scutellum yellow except for narrow black basal band. Mediotergite entirely black. Thoracic chaetotaxy: 2 scutellar, 2 notopleural, 1 postsutural supra-alar, 1 postalar, 1 intra-alar, 1 prescutellar acrostichal, 1 anepisternal and 4 scapular setae. Wing (Fig 10) hyaline in ground color; costal brown band confluent with vein R 2 + 3, very slightly widened apically; anal streak extending to posterior margin and slightly widened into a pale brown mark; cells bc and c colorless. Legs fuscous to black; fore and mid femora completely black, apical 3 / 4 hind femora black and remainder fulvous; tibiae dark fuscous to black; tarsi fuscous and apical 4 segments darker; mid tibiae each with an apical black spur. Abdomen (Fig 12). Oval in shape, completely black, without any yellow or fuscous pattern; pecten present on tergite 3. Tergite 5 slightly longer than tergite 4. Hind margin of sternite 5 deep, almost V-shaped. Male terminalia: Epandrium large and broad, rounded in posterior view (Fig 15); lateral surstylus small and short, apex slightly angulated in lateral view (Fig 16); medial surstylus with 2 black and similar size prensiseta. Glans elongate, with slender and membranous subapical lobe. Female. Unknown. Etymology. The specific name refers to B (B.) diospyri Drew, 1989, to which the new species is similar. Material examined. Holotype 3 (IZCAS), China: Yunnan: Nujiang Lushui, Pianma 1695m, 98 º 58 ’00’’, 26 º 11 ’00’’, 30 July 2009, Wang Shaojun and Zhao Kanglin, attracted to Cue lure; Paratype 3 (IZCAS), the same data with Holotype. Distribution. China, Yunnan (Nujiang) Attractant. Cue lure. Host. Unknown. Remarks. This species is similar to B (B.) diospyri Drew from Australia and B (B.) passiflorae (Froggatt) from Fiji, Tonga and Niue in scutum and abdomen completely black, but differs from B (B.) diospyri in face lacking a large black subquadrate facial spot and the wing with costal band widening slightly beyond tip of R 2 + 3. And differs from B (B.) passiflorae in the wing with costal band widening slightly beyond tip of R 2 + 3 and the fore and mid femora black, apical 3 / 4 of hind femora shining black, fore and hind tibiae dark fuscous, mid tibiae black and tarsi fuscous. This species also similar to B (B.) nigrofemoralis White & Tsuruta from Karnataka in scutum, fore and mid femora black, and similar wing pattern, but differs from B(B.) nigrofemoralis in scutum completely black and lacking two yellow narrow lateral postsutural vittae, abdomen completely black and lacking red brown bands and areas, also in 3 / 4 hind femora black and remainder fulvous.Published as part of Chen, Xiaolin, Zhou, Libing, Wang, Shaojun, Li, Zhiwen & Li, Jie, 2011, A new species and record of Bactrocera Macquart (Diptera, Tephritidae) from China, pp. 59-64 in Zootaxa 3014 on pages 60-63, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20739
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
