1,721,032 research outputs found
Optimizing anti-collision strategy for MASS: a safe reinforcement learning approach to improve maritime traffic safety
No full textMaritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) promise enhanced efficiency, reduced human errors, and to improve maritime traffic safety. However, MASS navigation in complex maritime traffic presents challenges, especially in collision avoidance strategy optimization (CASO). This paper proposes a novel risk-based CASO approach based on safe reinforcement learning (SRL) with a reliability and risk hierarchical critic network (SRL-R2HCN) approach. Key steps in developing the approach start with the formulation of collision risk assessment. This is followed by the construction of a hierarchical network structure, supplemented by the supporting reward function, multi-objective function, and reliability measurement to realize the SRL-R2HCN. Finally, simulation experiments are conducted in mixed obstacle scenarios, and the results are compared with traditional algorithms to showcase the advancement and fidelity of the new SRL-R2HCN method. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can accurately assess collision risks in mixed obstacle scenarios and generate safe, efficient, and reliable collision avoidance strategies. The outcomes of this research provide a sound theoretical basis for the future development of MASS navigation safety and significant potential to improve the safe and efficient operations of MASS. Furthermore, the methodology could also benefit maritime transportation and shipping management.<br/
COLERGs-constrained safe reinforcement learning for realising MASS's risk-informed collision avoidance decision making
Full text linkMaritime autonomous surface ship (MASS) represents a significant advancement in maritime technology, offering the potential for increased efficiency, reduced operational costs, and enhanced maritime traffic safety. However, MASS navigation in complex maritime traffic and congested water areas presents challenges, especially in Collision Avoidance Decision Making (CADM) during multi-ship encounter scenarios. Through a robust risk assessment design for time-sequential and joint-target ships (TSs) encounter scenarios, a novel risk and reliability critic-enhanced safe hierarchical reinforcement learning (RA-SHRL), constrained by the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs), is proposed to realize the autonomous navigation and CADM of MASS. Finally, experimental simulations are conducted against a time-sequenced obstacle avoidance scenario and a swarm obstacle avoidance scenario. The experimental results demonstrate that RA-SHRL generates safe, efficient, and reliable collision avoidance strategies in both time-sequential dynamic obstacles and mixed joint-TSs environments. Additionally, the RA-SHRL is capable of assessing risk and avoiding multiple joint-TSs. Compared with Deep Q-network (DQN) and Constrained Policy Optimization (CPO), the search efficiency of the algorithm proposed in this paper is improved by 40% and 12%, respectively. Moreover, it achieved a 91.3% success rate of collision avoidance during training. The methodology could also benefit other autonomous systems in dynamic environments
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
