1,721,615 research outputs found
Walsh, James Francis, NX54546
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/423761Surname: WALSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: JAMES FRANCIS. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX54546. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 35508.251261
Item: [2016.0049.56022] "Walsh, James Francis, NX54546
The Rebel Contraband Dataset
No full textData, codebook, and notes and sources for the Rebel Contraband Dataset
The Rebel Contraband Dataset
No full textData, codebook, and notes and sources for the Rebel Contraband Dataset
The Rebel Human Rights Violations Dataset
No full textThis is the repository for the Rebel Human Rights Dataset, which measures violations of nine international human rights by rebel groups engaged in civil war from 1990 to 2020
Replication Data for "Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons"
No full textData and commands to replicate figures and tables in James Igoe Walsh, "Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons," Research and Politics
Replication Data for "Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons"
No full textData and commands to replicate figures and tables in James Igoe Walsh, "Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons," Research and Politics
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
