1,720,959 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used

    Planting basin (Soil and water conservation) planned comparison protocol

    No full text
    Agricultural productivity in arid and semi-arid areas,such as Kitui and Makueni counties of Kenya, is limited by several challenges. These include water scarcity resulting from unpredictable and unreliable rains, and land degradation, in the form of soil erosion and compaction. Lack of adequate water leads to crop failure and poor harvests, yet irrigation infrastructure (including sourcing of water) is not always a viable option for resource-scarce, smallholder farmers in these counties. Investment in appropriate soil and water conservation practices at farm-scale is, therefore, a potential option to encourage sustainable agriculture production in semi-arid lands. The appropriateness of the technologies depends on the social, economic, and biophysical characteristics of the farming community. A number of research and development organisations, both government and non-governmental, have promoted practices and approaches to boost production in water scarce areas. For example the RAE Trust1 has been working with rainwater harvesting technologies such as contour earth bunds since 1982 and has recorded impressive results in Baringo County of Kenya (Black et al, 2012), while PDRT2 has used Zai planting pits and several other techniques to improve productivity on 125 000 ha in Niger (Danjuma and Mohammed, 2015). In addition, farmers experiment with their own innovations and/or modify technologies/practices learned from extension agents to suit their respective circumstances. However, despite this progress, there remain unanswered questions on the appropriate designs and combinations of practices to ensure farmers achieve optimum yields cost-effectively under various contexts. One innovation that is increasingly being promoted in Kitui and Makueni counties is the use of planting basins, commonly known as Zai pits, which concentrate water at the crop root zone, thereby lengthening the period of moisture availability for the crop. While improved crop yields have been realized through use of Zai pits in Ethiopia (Amede et al, 2011), southern Africa (Twomlow et al, 2009) and elsewhere (Roose et. al, 1999), questions on the appropriate design of pits (including size and shape), as well as the appropriate fertilization method to use for optimum crop production for the different contexts, remain among farmers. Farmers in 12 watersheds in Kitui and Makueni Counties of Kenya raised these questions as some of their learning priorities during the DryDev project community action planning (CAP) process in August 2015. This planned comparison aims to address these questions as a co-learning activity involving scientists, development agents and farmers in these watersheds, as part of DryDev’s farmer-led action learning component

    Planting Basins (soil and water conservation) revised planned comparison protocol

    No full text
    Field Implementation steps: Planting Basins (soil and water conservation) Planned Comparison – Modified for the 2017 Planting Seaso
    corecore