1,721,070 research outputs found
Analysis of human resource requirements in an adverse drug reaction evaluation consultation service
TRITERPENOID SAPONINS FROM ANEMONE-HUPEHENSIS
Four triterpenoid saponins were isolated from Anemone hupehensis. On the basis of chemical and spectroscopic evidence, two new saponins, hupehensis saponins D and E, were elucidated as 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl (1-->3)-beta-D-ribopyranosyl (1-->3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1-->2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl oleanolic acid-28-O-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1-->4)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl (1-->6)-beta-D-glucopyranoside and 3-O-beta-D-glucopyransoyl (1-->3-beta-D-ribopyranosyl (1-->3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1-->2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl hederagenin-28-O-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1-->4)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl (1-->6)-beta-D-glucopyranoside. The two known saponins were identified as huzhangosides B and D
Triterpenoid saponins from Anemone hupehensis
Two new triterpenoid saponins, named hupehensis saponin F and G, were isolated from the water soluble part of Anemone hupehensis Lemoine. By chemical and spectroscopic evidence, their structures were elucidated as 3-O-beta-D-ribopyranosyl(1 --> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl hederagennin-28-O-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 4)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 6)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 4)-beta-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 6)-beta-D-glucopyranoside and 3-O-beta-D-ribopyranosyl(1 --> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl hederagenin-28-O-beta-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 3)-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 4)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 6)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1 --> 4)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl(1 --> 6)-beta-D-glucopyranoside, respectively. Copyright (C) 1996 Published by Elsevier Science Lt
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
How Far Is Estimated Creatinine Clearance (eClcr) and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) from Measured Creatinine Clearance (mClcr) in Taiwanese
- …
