1,720,987 research outputs found
SEJARAH, KEDUDUKAN, SERTA PROSPEK PERANGKAT DESA DI INDONESIA
No full text Position of village government apparatus in Indonesia is still ambivalent until now, because of unclear village institution position. Law Nomor 6 Year 2014 about Village have the hybrid model, combination between self governing community and local self government (but quasi). According to Indonesia Constitution 1945 (before amendment), village or the other names will be construct as local government, and implemented in several law about local government during 1945-1979. After amendment, village or the other names, will construct as social community. Facing rapid change of industrial revolution 4.0 (Schwab; 2016) and society 5.0 (Fukuyama; 2018), Indonesia government should choose one of three choices namely : self governing community, local self government, and hybrid.
Key words : ambivalence of village apparatus position, self governing community, local self government, hybrid
Keuangan Publik Dan Sumber Daya Manusia
No full textAlthough decentralization and autonomy is exercised since Indonesian republic is formed, but they are not developed such as in West Countries, because it is not a panacea for the ill state or especially local government. Theoritically, there are many prerequisites of decentralization and autonomy that should called attention to the civil servants whose governed the local government. Many theoriticians written down about decentralization, included the advantages and disadvantages of it, the prerequisites should be fulfilled to apply it.Decentralization means that there are transfer of authority and responsibility in public function from central government to local government, other semi public agenda and also to the private sector. Also there are opinion about form and type of decentralization. The interesting things is the type of decentralization which divided decentralization into 4 types namely political, administrative, fiscal, economic and market decentralization.The aim of fiscal decentralization is to transfer the source of the financial to local such as the right to own and manage their own properties and the right to manage their human resources. But it is restricted by the upper rules, the well being of the people and should be applied properly.Local government give more attention to how they can earn more revenue than how to used it. Actually many infraction is occurred in the expenditures area. Local government is facing constraint with the fiscal decentralization relating with the source of the revenue. Central government still have right to attract revenue from local government, the effect is the state give balance aid to complete APBD (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah). So central government still become the importance role in public decentralizationThe expenditure part in APBD is consist of two parts, routine budget and development budget. In reality, both of them is used for the sake of the local government itself. Nowadays the routine budget is bigger than development budget. All of this constraint can be suremount if, the local government has human resources that competent in their tasks. Once again central government didn\u27t give a guide to the local government about the national Employee System, the effect is the local government can use by their own way about how to manage their civil servants
Keuangan Publik Dan Sumber Daya Manusia
No full textAlthough decentralization and autonomy is exercised since Indonesian republic is formed, but they are not developed such as in West Countries, because it is not a panacea for the ill state or especially local government. Theoritically, there are many prerequisites of decentralization and autonomy that should called attention to the civil servants whose governed the local government. Many theoriticians written down about decentralization, included the advantages and disadvantages of it, the prerequisites should be fulfilled to apply it.Decentralization means that there are transfer of authority and responsibility in public function from central government to local government, other semi public agenda and also to the private sector. Also there are opinion about form and type of decentralization. The interesting things is the type of decentralization which divided decentralization into 4 types namely political, administrative, fiscal, economic and market decentralization.The aim of fiscal decentralization is to transfer the source of the financial to local such as the right to own and manage their own properties and the right to manage their human resources. But it is restricted by the upper rules, the well being of the people and should be applied properly.Local government give more attention to how they can earn more revenue than how to used it. Actually many infraction is occurred in the expenditures area. Local government is facing constraint with the fiscal decentralization relating with the source of the revenue. Central government still have right to attract revenue from local government, the effect is the state give balance aid to complete APBD (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah). So central government still become the importance role in public decentralizationThe expenditure part in APBD is consist of two parts, routine budget and development budget. In reality, both of them is used for the sake of the local government itself. Nowadays the routine budget is bigger than development budget. All of this constraint can be suremount if, the local government has human resources that competent in their tasks. Once again central government didn\u27t give a guide to the local government about the national Employee System, the effect is the local government can use by their own way about how to manage their civil servants
MODEL PENGUKURAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA DPRD DALAM KONTEKS GOOD GOVERNANCE
No full textIndonesia is one of the country which running biggest decentralization in the world, include transfer of authority, transfer of money, and moving government officials from central government to sub national government. There are three targets of decentralization i.e political, administrative, and social economy. One of political target of decentralization is make infrastructure and suprastructure of politic in local government more democratic and accountable. One of characteristic of good governance is accountable, and then more bigger and bigger transferring authority and money from central government to local government, must followed by accountability. But DPRD as local council have no model for accountability. Accountability of DPRD as political institutional is measuring by the functions, not only how to use the annually budget. Usually DPRD have four functions i.e budgetary, how to make local regulation, political controlling, and representative function. This paper is try to make model for measuring performance accountability of DPRD in good governance context.Indonesia adalah salah satu negara yang menjalankan desentralisasi terbesar di dunia, dilihat dari kewenangan pemerintah pusat yang ditransfer ke daerah, pemberian dana perimbangan, maupun personil yang dipindahkan. Ada tiga tujuan desentralisasi yakni tujuan politik, tujuan administrasi, dan tujuan sosial ekonomi. Salah satu tujuan desentralisasi yakni tujuan politik adalah membuat infrastruktur dan suprastruktur politik di daerah lebih demokratis dan akuntabel. Seiring dengan besarnya kewenangan dan dana yang dikelola oleh daerah otonom, perlu diimbangi dengan akuntabilitasnya. Hal ini sesuai dengan salah satu karakteristik good governance. Selama ini pengukuran akuntabilitas lebih ditujukan kepada pemerintah daerah yang terdiri dari kepala daerah dan OPD (organisasi pemerintah daerah). Padahal dalam pengertian pemerintahan daerah ada pemerintah daerah dan DPRD. Pengukuran akuntabilitas kinerja DPRD seringkali diartikan dengan pengukuran kinerja Sekretariat DPRD sebagai bagian dari OPD, padahal DPRD sebagai Lembaga politik seharusnya memiliki parameter yang berbeda dengan OPD. Parameter kinerja DPRD seharusnya berkaitan dengan fungsi-fungsinya, bukan hanya diukur dari pemanfaatan dana yang dikelola oleh Sekretariat DPRD. Sampai saat ini belum ada pengukuran kinerja DPRD yang sesuai fungsinya, sehingga perlu disusun sebuah model yang akan mencakup pengukuran fungsi penyusunan Perda, fungsi anggaran, fungsi pengawasan, serta fungsi representasinya
ASPEK PEMERINTAHAN dan PERUBAHAN KOMPREHENSIF ERA DIGITAL
No full textABSTRACT
Digital era has been change human aspect significantly. Changing one aspect of life is boost another aspect . I tried to analysis impact of changing five aspect (management, organization, leadership, industry, society) to government aspect. External environment of government is playing important role to push changing in governmental management, organization, and leadership. Ideally, development of one aspect changing significant and simultan with another aspect, but empirically development of one aspect sometime faster than another aspect. Government as the higher organization of the state must control development of all aspect to maintain equilibrium of the state and society.
Key words : digital era, changing continually, changing in government aspect
THREE PARADIGMS IN GOVERNMENT (GOOD GOVERNANCE, DYNAMIC GOVERNANCE, AND AGILE GOVERNANCE)
No full textPeter F. Drucker(1991) said that prime causal of the state fail is management. Drucker saying is concordance with UNDP and World Bank, made a new paradigm in government namely, good governance. After a decade, good governance paradigm running all over the world, Neo and Chen (2013) introduce dynamic governance paradigm as continuing and improving of good governance paradigm. This paradigm focus on adaptive policies, also government official must have three capabilities, which are thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across. Schwab in 2017 published a book about industrial revolution 4.0 that shocked the world. One year after, Schwab with Davis (2018) introduce a new paradigm for governance in industrial revolution 4.0 with the name agile governance. This paper is trying to explain concept connectivity between good governance, dynamic governance, and agile governance to achieve better governance. This paper seeks to explain the link between the paradigm of good governance, dynamic governance, and agile governance. The goal is that state and regional administrators can use it for public policy making material that benefits the community and is anticipatory.
Key words: agile governance, dynamic governance, good governance
- …
