1,722,387 research outputs found

    Hon. L. W. Powell

    No full text
    Title from unverified information on negative sleeve.Annotation from negative, scratched into emulsion: L. W. Powell KY.M.C. Ky.Forms part of Brady-Handy Photograph Collection (Library of Congress)

    1917-02-28 Testimony of G. W. Powell

    No full text
    The testimony of G. W. Powell given before the Lawrence County Circuit Court on February 28, 1917

    Clifford W. Brown, Lynda W. Powell & Clyde Wilcox. Serious Money

    No full text
    Arnold Marc. Clifford W. Brown, Lynda W. Powell & Clyde Wilcox. Serious Money. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°72, mars 1997. Le déplacement dans l'histoire et la culture américaines. pp. 121-122

    John F. Padget – Walter W. Powell: The Emergence of Organizations and Markets

    No full text
    John F. Padgett – Walter W. Powell: The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press, 201

    Mrs. G. W. Powell, Mrs. J. H. Irvin and Mrs. Paul F. Glass .

    No full text
    Left to right, Mrs. G. W. Powell, Mrs. J. H. Irvin and Mrs. Paul F. Glass (not published).https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/1517/thumbnail.jp

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore