1,721,171 research outputs found
Statement of the Uterus Committee of the Gynaecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on the PORTEC-3 study
No full textA case of severe myelotoxicity following craniospinal irradiation in conjunction with temozolomide and nimotuzumab in a pediatric patient with primary metastatic diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
No full text
Radiation protection procedures in the context of the new Medical Research Act: what has changed, what has not? A joint overview by the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)
No full textZusammenfassung Durch das Medizinforschungsgesetz sind viele Aspekte auch im Genehmigungs- und Anzeigeverfahren für studienbedingte Strahlenanwendungen angepasst worden. Dieser Artikel soll einen Überblick über die neue Situation geben und den Forschenden, insbesondere im Bereich der Radioonkologie, als Wegweiser für die medizinisch-rechtliche Planung von Studienprojekten dienen
A case of severe myelotoxicity following craniospinal irradiation in conjunction with temozolomide and nimotuzumab in a pediatric patient with primary metastatic diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
