1,720,970 research outputs found

    Post-traumatic optic neuropathy: our surgical and medical protocol

    Full text link
    Post-traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is a rare, but very much feared event. It is a traumatic injury of the optic nerve at any level along its course (often inside the optic canal), with partial or total loss of visual acuity, temporarily or permanently. Until now, an univocal treatment strategy does not exist. The clinical records of 26 patients, treated from 2002 to 2013, were reviewed. The most frequent cause of injury was road traffic accident (63%), followed by iatrogenic damage, work injuries, sport or home accidents. All patients underwent pre-operative ophthalmological evaluation, neuro-imaging (angio-CT or angio-MRI scans) and systemic corticosteroid therapy. All patients required a surgical treatment, due to poor response to medical therapy; it consisted of an endonasal endoscopic decompression of the intracanalicular segment of the optic nerve, performed by removing the bony wall of the optical canal and releasing the perineural sheath. Improvement of visual acuity was reached in 65% of cases. No minor or major complication occurred intra- or post-operative, with a maximum follow-up time of 41 months. An improvement in visual acuity was achieved, although very limited in some cases, when surgery was performed as close as possible to the traumatic event. In the literature, there is no evidence-based data evaluating both of the two main treatment options (medical therapy versus surgical decompression), to state which is the gold standard in the treatment for TON. We discuss the pro and cons of our protocol: medical endovenous steroid treatment, within 8 h of injury, and endoscopic surgical decompression within 12-24 since the beginning of medical therapy, represent the best solution in terms of risk-benefit ratio for the patients

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Sinonasal cancer in a worker exposed to chromium in an unusual industrial sector

    No full text
    Background: Occupational exposure to chromium is carcinogenic for human respiratory system. Due to the low incidence of sinonasal malignancies, there is still a paucity of evidence to confirm that chromium(VI) exposure is a cause of nasal cancer. Objectives: To report on a sinonasal cancer (SNC) of rare occupational origin, increasing the awareness on epidemiological knowledge of occupational exposures to chromium compounds. Methods: We describe a case of a 64-year-old chrome plater who worked in the galvanic industry in the early 1970s. After a latency period of 39 years, he was diagnosed with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC). A brief review of the literature was conducted. Results: A thorough occupational history revealed a 4-year-long occupational exposure to chromium(VI) during a magnesium cylinder plating process involved in computer production. The patient underwent endoscopic endonasal removal of the SNUC. He is alive with no evidence of disease at 40-month follow-up. Our literature review identified 8 papers concerning 40 cases of chrome-induced sinonasal tumors. The maximum relative risk of SNC developing in chromium-exposed workers was 15.4. Conclusions: When dealing with patients diagnosed with SNC, the possibility of an underlying occupational risk is worth further investigation. Because chromium exposure is rare, and the incidence of SNUC is low, any information emerging on clinical and exposure-related aspects of SNCs in chrome plating workers can contribute to adding evidence on the possible causal relationship between chromium and sinonasal malignancies
    corecore