488 research outputs found
Zur didaktischen Begründung des Schwimmens in der Schule
No full textKurz D, Volck G. Zur didaktischen Begründung des Schwimmens in der Schule. In: Volck G, ed. Schwimmen in der Schule. Schriftenreihe zur Praxis der Leibeserziehung und des Sports ; 109. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 1977: 41-58
Lehrplan Schwimmsport, Band 1: Technik
No full textUngerechts B, Volck G, Freitag W. Lehrplan Schwimmsport, Band 1: Technik. Schorndorf: Hofmann Verlag; 2009
Lehrplan Schwimmsport 02: Vermittlung und Training im Schwimmen
No full textVolck G, Freitag W, Hohmann A, Ungerechts B. Lehrplan Schwimmsport 02: Vermittlung und Training im Schwimmen. 1. Auflage. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 2012
The New Jersey African American history curriculum guide, grades 9 to 12. by Larry A. Greene, Lenworth Gunther.
No full textThe New Jersey African American history curriculum guide is a resource for New Jersey high school teachers who wish to incorporate African American experiences into their teaching of U.S. history. The guide provides narratives, keywords, suggested activites, and bibliographies.CONTENTS:
Foreword -- About the Authors -- Preface -- How to Use This Guide -- Acknowledgments -- Unit 1 African Beginnings -- Unit 2 Africa, Europe, and the Rise of Afro-America, 1441-1619 -- Unit 3 African American Slavery in the Colonial Era, 1619-1775 -- Unit 4 Blacks in the Revolutionary Era, 1776-1789 -- Unit 5 Slavery and Abolition in Post-Revolutionary and Antebellum America, 1790-1860 -- Unit 6 African Americans and the Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Unit 7 The Reconstruction Era, 1865-1877 -- Unit 8 The Rise of Jim Crow and The Nadir, 1878-1915 -- Unit 9 World War I and the Great Migration, 1915-1920 -- Unit 10 The Decade of the Twenties: From the Great Migration to the Great Depression -- Unit 11 The 1930s: The Great Depression -- Unit 12 World War II: The Struggle for Democracy at Home and Abroad, 1940-1945 -- Unit 13 The Immediate Postwar Years, 1945-1953 -- Unit 14 The Civil Rights and Black Power Era: Gains and Losses, 1954-1970 -- Unit 15 Beyond Civil Rights, 1970-1994
Letter to William A. Starna from Gunther Michelson, January 12, 1987
No full textIn a letter dated January 12, 1987, Gunther Michelson writes to William Starna, confirming his satisfaction with being listed as the chapter author for the word list and receiving credit for his contributions to the endnotes. Michelson requests the replacement of pages 4-6 of the endnotes with the enclosed pages, including corrections and insertions. He also mentions the challenges he faced in working on the Mohawk passage in endnotes 110. This item does not include the enclosed pages Michelson mentions in the letter
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) Japanese Version
No full textCHERRIES 日本語版 (原著 [Original article] = Eysenbach G. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004;6(3):e34 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34. PMID: 15471760. PMCID: PMC1550605; Eysenbach G. Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e8. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2042. PMID: 22223031. PMCID: 4220447)[Author = 原著者] Gunther Eysenbach, [Translators = 訳者] Yoshimitsu Takahashi (高橋由光), Takeo Nakayama (中山健夫)著者向けのe調査推奨チェックリスト「CHERRIES」は、e調査 [e-survey] の方法論を完全に記載できるように、メディカル・インターネット・リサーチ誌 [Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR)] によって作られた。これは、医学文献報告の質を確保するために作成されたCONSORT 声明(ランダム化試験向け)や、QUOROM声明(システマチックレビュー向け）のような、推奨用チェックリストに準じている。CHERRIES 声明に則ったウェブベース調査の論文によって、読者は標本集団の(自己)選択 [sample (self-)selection] に関してより適切に理解することができる。そして、「代表性のある」標本集団 [representative sample] とは異なる意義のある新たな可能性に気づくことができるだろう。著者がこのチェックリストを守ることで、ウェブベース調査に関する報告の有用性が増すことが期待される
Constitutional sociology and corporations: A conversation with Gunther Teubner
No full textAbstract The present work corresponds to a conversation held with the German sociologist Gunther Teubner. In it, the author addresses central aspects related to the sociology of constitutions and their contribution to the understanding of the negative effects of the dark side of functional differentiation. Gunther Teubner is professor emeritus of private law and sociology of law at the prestigious Goethe University. His work is widely known for his contributions to the field of the sociology of law, particularly for his theory of autopoietic law, the concept of reflexive law, and, currently, for his theory of societal constitutionalization
Combining the Best of Gunther and Sullivan
No full textIn the field of casebooks, there are few classics, but Gerald Gunther\u27s Constitutional Law has long been viewed as one of them. More than twenty years ago it was heralded in the Harvard Law Review as the Hart and Wechsler of constitutional law. After decades of solo authorship, Gunther is joined on the 13th edition by Kathleen Sullivan, who was primarily responsible for revising (among other sections) the chapters on freedom of expression. This partnership has succeeded in improving what was already perhaps the strongest section of the book. This Review examines the organization of the free expression materials, considers the selection and editing of cases, and comments on the notes and questions. But this casebook is not merely a teaching tool; it is also a scholarly work bristling with ideas. At the end of thisRreview, the author will identify and engage an overarching view that finds expression in the notes and more subtly in the organization of the free speech material
Equal Work, Comparable Worth and Disparate Treatment: An Argument for Narrowly Construing \u3cem\u3eCounty of Washington v. Gunther\u3c/em\u3e
No full textThe Supreme Court\u27s decision in County of Washington v. Gunther rendered the Equal Protection Act\u27s equal work requirement inapplicable to claims of gender discrimination in compensation brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It is possible that Gunther will be invoked as a basis for applying the controversial theory of comparable worth to such claims. The author argues, however, that the Supreme Court\u27s rationale in Gunther precludes a comparable worth theory. He then examines alternative possible means of establishing post-Gunther claims under Title VII in terms of that rationale
Berufsfeld Sport fuer Tuebinger Diplomsportpaedagoginnen und Diplomsportpaedagogen Projektbericht
No full textDie Studie setzt sich aus vier Teiluntersuchungen zusammen: 1. einer Situationsanalyse des Arbeitsmarkts im Bereich Sport(mit Darstellung verschiedener Taetigkeitsfelder sowie einer Inhaltsanalyse von Stellenanzeigen der Jahre 1990-1994 im Raum Stuttgart); 2. einer Verbleibsstudie ehemaliger Absolventen des Studiengangs Sportpaedagogik an der Universitaet Tuebingen; 3. einer Erkundungsstudie zu Berufszielen und zur Studienorganisation von Studierenden des Diplom-Studiengangs im WS 1994/95; 4. einer Arbeitgeberbefragung, die an Hand von Einstellungskriterien aufzeigen sollte, welche Moeglichkeiten und Schwierigkeiten Hochschulabsolventen bei ihrer Suche nach einem Arbeitsplatz antreffen. (IAB)SIGLEAvailable from IAB-94-177-31 BC 128 / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekDEGerman
- …
