131,393 research outputs found

    Voet D., Voet J.G., Pratt C.W. - Fondamenti di biochimica - Zanichelli, Bologna 2007, pp. 1152 Edizione italiana di Donald Voet, Judith G. Voet, Charlotte W. Pratt – Fundamentals of Biochemistry: Life at the Molecular Level - 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 2006

    No full text
    Seconda edizione italiana del testo classico di biochimica, che mantiene il rigore e la chiarezza della prima edizione ma approfondisce le descrizioni di tecniche e metodiche analitiche, dedicando particolare attenzione alle malattie derivate da difetti metabolici. Ampio spazio è dedicato alla bioinformatica, con descrizione delle principali banche dati genomiche e proteomiche. Capitoli completamente nuovi: funzioni delle proteine, meccanismi di trasduzione del segnale, ruolo dell'RNA nella regolaizone dell'espressione genica. Corredato da problemi, esercizi di calcolo, grafici molecolari, riferimenti bioinformatici e profili biografici dei principali studiosi di biochimica

    Fundamentals Of Biochemistry: Life At The Molecular Level

    No full text
    Voet, Voet and Pratt’s Fundamentals of Biochemistry, 5e addresses the enormous advances in biochemistry, particularly in the areas of structural biology and Bioinformatics, by providing a solid biochemical foundation that is rooted in chemistry to prepare students for the scientific challenges of the future. While continuing in its tradition of presenting complete and balanced coverage that is clearly written and relevant to human health and disease, Fundamentals of Biochemistry, 5e includes new pedagogy and enhanced visuals that provide a pathway for student learning. The authors are careful to present new information such that it links it to existing content, ever mindful that students assimilate new information only in the proper context

    MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations

    No full text
    Information overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    "Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"

    No full text
    Both spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.

    A. D. Fricke, author

    No full text
    Black and white photograph of author, A. D. Fricke

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Scholarly Communication and Publishing Lunch and Learn Talk #11: The ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund

    No full text
    At the May 2014 talk, you will learn about the ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund--what it is, why we do it, how it works, and how the program is going so far

    Fulcidax Voet 1806

    No full text
    <i>Fulcidax</i> Voet <p>(Figs. 1 G; 2 F; 3 F; 4 F; 5 F)</p> <p> <i>Fulcidax</i> Voet, 1806: 33; Type species: <i>Fulcidax azureus</i> Voet, 1806 = <i>Clytra monstrosa</i> Fabricius, 1798, by monotypy; Jacoby, 1881: 90 (Central American species); Monrós, 1952: 641 (overview of genus); Blackwelder, 1946: 650 (catalog); Seeno and Wilcox, 1982: 43 (catalog).</p> <p> <i>Poropleura</i> Lacordaire, 1848: 863; Type species: <i>Clytra monstrosa</i> Fabricius, 1798, by subsequent designation of Navajas, 1946: 245.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Length 6.50-7.20 mm, width 4.60-5.00 mm. General body shape subquadrate, metallic coloration. Antenna serrate beyond 3 rd antennomere, 2 nd and 3 rd antennomeres slightly widened, but not dilated distally. Head with the vertex longitudinally impressed. Pronotum with median elevation, surface tuberculate. Pronotal base opposite mesoscutellum (posterior pronotal lobe) with acute notch. Prosternum acutely narrowing posteriorly, prosternal process 2/3 size of entire prosternum. Anterior margin of metasternum concave. Mesoscutellum trapezoidal. Metascutellum not exposed. Sutural serration of elytra well developed beyond middle of suture towards the apex. Elytral tubercules pronounced. First ventrite with lateral tubercles. Tibiae slightly curved, flattened, with sharp dorsal edge. Fore- and midtibial apices with spine. Tarsal claw simple.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Central and South America (Monrós 1952).</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> <i>Fulcidax</i> can be distinguished from all other chlamisine genera by the longitudinally impressed vertex of the head, simple tarsal claws, large body size, and usually bright metallic coloration.</p> <p>Currently, 7 species are included in the genus (Monrós 1952).</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> </p> <p> <i>Fulcidax bacca</i> (Kirby):</p> <p>1) a. [Brazil] Canlareira, S. Paulo, 8.VII.1929, J. Halik, 1275/ b. <i>Fulcidax bacca</i></p> <p>Kirby/ c. J. Guerrin det. 1942/ d. Brazil, Halik 1966 Collection. 2) a. Brazil / b.</p> <p>CF Baker collection, 1927/ c. <i>Fulcidax bacca</i> (Kirby) F. Monrós det. 1949.</p> <p> <i>Fulcidax chimaera</i> (Lacordaire):</p> <p>1) a. [Argentina] Munici[pi]o Rio Verde, Estado Goyaz, Dr. Nick. XI.945/ b.</p> <p>F. Monrós Collection, 1959/ c. <i>Fulcidax chimaera</i> (Lac.) F. Monrós det. 1952.</p> <p> <i>Fulcidax coelestina</i> (Lacordaire):</p> <p>1) a. Bolivia, Trinidad, X.1917 Lizer. Deletang/ b. F. Monrós Collection,</p> <p>1959/ c. <i>Fulcidax coelestina</i> (Lac.) F. Monrós det. 1948.</p>Published as part of <i>Chamorro-Lacayo, Maria & Konstantinov, Alexander, 2009, Synopsis of warty leaf beetle genera of the world (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae, Chlamisini), pp. 63-88 in ZooKeys 8 (8)</i> on pages 76-77, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.8.90, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/576444">http://zenodo.org/record/576444</a&gt
    corecore