170,917 research outputs found
La Mission apostolique de saint Julien et la tradition de l'Église du Mans avant 1645, par l'abbé C. Pottier.
No full textViollet Paul. La Mission apostolique de saint Julien et la tradition de l'Église du Mans avant 1645, par l'abbé C. Pottier.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1881, tome 42. pp. 207-208
La Mission apostolique de saint Julien et la tradition de l'Église du Mans avant 1645, par l'abbé C. Pottier.
No full textViollet Paul. La Mission apostolique de saint Julien et la tradition de l'Église du Mans avant 1645, par l'abbé C. Pottier.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1881, tome 42. pp. 207-208
Mais qui est on ?
No full textViollet C. Mais qui est on ?. In: Linx, n°18, 1988. Analyse grammaticale des corpus oraux, sous la direction de Françoise Gadet et Françoise Kerleroux. pp. 67-75
Disegnare per conoscere: anatomia, meccanica e architettura nei disegni di Viollet-le-Duc/ Knowing by Drawing: Anatomy, Mechanics and Architecture in Viollet-le-Duc’s Drawings
No full textThe present study investigates the relations between technical-scientific illustration and architectural drawings in the context of European Historicism. In the thriving publishing activity that characterised the first decades of the 19th centur y and aimed at promoting knowledge dissemination, such illustrations take on growing importance in all fields. In such a context, the case of the renowned architect and restorer Viollet-le-Duc is significant due to the quality and consistency of his theoretical elaboration and graphic work, as well as to his undisputed critical and editorial popularity. The tireless French scholar and draughtsman theorised drawing as a fundamental means of knowing the deep structures of reality in ever y field.The analysis of texts and images sheds light on a transfer of ways of thinking from the natural sciences to architecture that tran-slates into a sort of “biological” depiction of buildings based on unshakeable rationalism founded on life sciences. In accordance with his surrounding epistemological context, Viollet-le-Duc carries out an inquir y into architecture, and medieval architecture in particular, that was based on the study of the existing relations among the parts and the relationship between conformations and functions, and was borrowed from studies in anatomy and integrated with a reading of the rational efficiency of the architectural organism in mechanical terms. Thus, did organic and mechanical metaphors attain a synthesis that is significantly mirrored in the ways of drawing
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Italian backgrounds. 1835-1837. Ruskin and Viollet-le-Duc early travels in Italy
No full text[EN] Comparing John Ruskin and Viollet-le-Duc to highlight their opposing approaches to protecting the past is frequent when reading about them and is indeed valid and effective. Here we take this approach, moving along with their travels in Italy which also have never been compared. Interpreting preservation as conservation and maintenance on one hand, or restoration and repair on the other are the opposing strategies upheld by these two authoritative figures in European cultural attitudes to restoration in the mid-19th century. Focusing on the 1830s, and their first visits to Italy implies grasping how their experience of architecture, landscape, and Italian society influenced their later reflections on conservation. The aim is to highlight the impact on contemporary and future generations of a concept of the monument as a lasting object, that can be repaired and perfected, rather than a live one, because it is marked by time, and conditioned by the nature of the places and local traditions.[ES] La puesta en paralelo de dos maneras opuestas de entender la protección del legado arquitectónico, la de John Ruskin y la de Eugène Viollet-le-Duc, comportan una clave de lectura reiterada, objetivamente válida y eficaz. El presente texto retoma esta confrontación en el ámbito de sus viajes a Italia. Entender la tutela como conservación y mantenimiento, en un caso, o como restauración y reparación, en el otro, constituyen enfoques contrapuestos que influyeron significativamente en la cultura europea de la restauración de mediados del siglo XIX. El foco puesto en los años treinta y en sus primeros viajes por Italia permite comparar las premisas de sus reflexiones sobre la experiencia de la arquitectura, el paisaje y la sociedad italianos. Se pretende subrayar el impacto en las generaciones coetáneas y contemporáneas de una concepción de «monumento» como objeto perdurable, en tanto que reparable y mejorable, antes que como realidad efímera, por estar marcado por el tiempo y condicionado por la naturaleza del lugar y las tradiciones locales.Grisoni, MM. (2022). Aventuras italianas 1835-1837. Los primeros viajes a Italia de Ruskin y Viollet-le-Duc. Loggia, Arquitectura & Restauración. (35):8-27. https://doi.org/10.4995/loggia.2022.17846OJS82735ABRAHAM, P.: Viollet-Le-Duc et le rationalisme medieval. Vincent, Freal & C., Paris, 1934. https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmo.1934.10100ANTISTA, G., SCIBILIA, F.: (eds). Paesaggi e architetture nei disegni di Eugène E. Viollet-le-Duc: le voyage en Sicile. Catalogo della mostra, Assessorato dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana, Palermo, 2016.ASTRUC, J.: “La restauration de la Cité”. Mémoires de la Société des arts et des sciences de Carcassonne, s. II., vol. 10, 1914-1919, pp. 1-32.AUZAS, P. M.: Eugene Viollet-le-Duc: 1814-1879. Caisse nationale des monuments historiques et des sites, [Paris], 1965.BELLINI, A.: Viollet-le-Duc: idea dell’architettura ed idea del restauro, in Viollet-le-Duc: l’architettura del desiderio, Dipartimento per la conservazione delle risorse architettoniche e ambientali, Facoltà di Architettura del Politecnico, Milano, 1980, pp. 33-91.BELLINI, A.: “Riflessioni sull’attualità di Ruskin”. Restauro, n° 71-72 (1984), pp. 63-84.BONI, G.: “John Ruskin”. Nuova Antologia, s. VI Vol. 200 (1919), pp. 317-320.BROOKS, M. W.: John Ruskin and victorian architecture. Thames and Hudson, London, 1989.BYRON, G.G.: Don Juan, Thomas Davison, Whitefriars, London 1819.BYRON, G.G.: Childe Harold’s pilgrimage, John Murray, London, 1812-1818.CAILLAT, V.: Parallèle des maisons de Paris construites depuis 1850 jusqu’à non jours. A. Morel & C., Paris, 1876.COLLINGWOOD, W.G.: John Ruskin: A Biographical Outline. J.S. Virtue & Co, London, 1889.COLLINGWOOD, W.G.: The Life and Work of John Ruskin. Methuen & Co, London, 1893.Commission des monuments historiques. Rapport au ministre de l’intérieur. Typographie de Firmin Didot Frères, Paris, 1843.COOK, E.T.: Studies in Ruskin. Allen, Orpington, 1890.COOK, E.T., WEDDERBURN, A.: The works of John Ruskin, George Allen & Longmans, London-New York, 39 voll., 1903-1912.CROCHET, B.: Viollet-le-Duc et la sauvegarde des monuments historiques. Ouest-France, Rennes, 2015.DE SETA, C.: Vedutisti e viaggiatori in Italia tra Settecento e Ottocento. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino. 1999.DEZZI BARDESCHI, M.: Viollet-le-Duc: la teoria della progettazione nel “cerchio stretto” del restauro, in Viollet-le-Duc: l’architettura del desiderio, Dipartimento per la conservazione delle risorse architettoniche e ambientali, Facoltà di Architettura del Politecnico, Milano, 1980, pp. 1-32.DI STEFANO, R.: John Ruskin. Interprete dell’architettura e del restauro. Edizioni scientifiche italiane, Napoli, 19691°, 1983.ENAUD-LECHIEN, I., PRUNGNAUD, J.: (eds). Postérité de John Ruskin. L’héritage ruskinien dans les textes littéraires et les écrits esthétiques. Recontres, Classiques Garnier, Paris, 2011.AA. VV.: Exposition de l’oeuvre de Violet-le-Duc ouverte au Musée des thermes et de l’hotel de Cluny sous le patronage du minister de l’instrction publique et des Beaux-Arts, Hotel de Cluny, 1880GAMBLE, C. J.: Proust as Interpreter of Ruskin. The Seven Lamps of Traslation. Summa Publications inc, Birmingham (Alabama), 2002.GOUT, P.: Viollet-Le-Duc. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa doctrine. Revue de l’Art Chretien, supplement III, Edounet Champion, Paris, 1914.HARRISON, F.: John Ruskin. Macmillan & Co., London, 1902.HILTON, T.: John Ruskin. Yale University Press, New Haven – London, 2002.HOBSON, J.A.: John Ruskin, Social Reformer. J. Nisbet & Co., London, 1898.Le voyage d’Italie d’Eugene Viollet-le-Duc 1836-1837, Catalogo della mostra itinerante, Parigi, gennaio-marzo 1980 - Firenze, aprile-giugno 1980, Firenze, Centro Di, 1980.LENIAUD, J. M.: Viollet-Le-Duc, ou Les delires du systeme. Menges, Paris, 1994.MATHER, J.M.: John Ruskin. His Life and Teaching. Warne & Co., London, 1897.MICHEL, A.: “De Viollet-le-Duc à Barres et à Rodin”. Journal des debats, 10 marzo 1914a, pp. 1-2.MICHEL, A.: “Les restaurations de Viollet-le-Duc”. Journal des debats, 31 marzo 1914b, pp. 1-2.MIDDLETON, R., WATKIN, D.: Architettura dell’Ottocento, Electa, Milano. 19771°, 1988.MILSAND, J.: L’esthétique anglaise: étude sur M. John Ruskin. Germer Bailliere, Paris, 1864.MURPHY, K. D.: Memory and modernity: Viollet-le-Duc at Vézelay. Penn State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2000.NEUFCHATEAU (de), F.: La Cité de Carcassonne et les rebatisseurs des ruines. Bonnafous-Thomas, Carcassonne, 1912.OJETTI, U.: “Notizia letteraria. Ruskin e la religione della bellezza”. Nuova Antologia, s. IV, anno XXXII, Vol. 70, fasc. 14, 16 luglio 1897, pp. 368-376.PEVSNER, N.: Ruskin and Viollet-Le-Duc. Englishness and Frenchness in the appreciation of Gothic architecture. Thames and Hudson, London 1969.PESVNER, N.: Ruskin et Viollet-le-Duc: un Anglais Francais face a l’architecture gothique. Academy Editions, Paris, 1980, pp. 48-49.PROUST, M.: “John Ruskin”. Gazzette des Beux Arts, avril, n°514, 1900a, pp. 310-318.PROUST, M.: “John Ruskin”. Gazzette des Beux Arts, aoust, n°518, 1900b, pp. 135-146.PROUST, M.: “Ruskin a Notre-Dame d’Amiens”. Mercure de France, IV, 1900c, pp. 5-88.ROSSETTI, W.H.: Ruskin. Rossetti. Pre-Raphaelitism. G. Allen & Co., London, 1899.ROSTAND, A.: “Viollet-le-Duc. Historien de l’architecture francaise”. Revue Critique des idées et des livres. Vol. XXIV, n°142, 10 mars 1914, pp. 530-542.RUSKIN, J.: “Facts and Considerations on the Strata of Mont Blanc, and on some instances of twisted Strata observable in Switzerland”. Magazine of Natural History, Vol. VII, n° 44 (dicembre 1834), pp. 644-645RUSKIN, J.: “Leoni: a Romance of Italy”. Friendship’s offering, 1837, pp. 217-226.RUSKIN, J.: The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Smith, Elder & Co, London, 1849. https://doi.org/10.2307/20646641RUSKIN, J.: The Stones of Venice, 3 voll., Smith, Elder & Co, London, 1851-1853.RUSKIN, J.: Lectures on Architecture and Painting, Smith, Elder & Co, London, 1854.RUSKIN, J.: The Poetry of Architecture or, the Architecture of the Nations of Europe considered in its association with natural scenery and national character, G. Allen, Orpington, 1893.SAINT PAUL, A.: Viollet-le-Duc ses travaux d’art et son système archéologique. Aux Bureaux de l’année archèologiche, Paris, 1881.SCARAMELLINI, G.: La geografia dei viaggiatori. Raffigurazioni individuali e immagini collettive nei resoconti di viaggio, Unicopli, Milano, 1993.SIZERANNE (de La), R.: Ruskin et la religion de la beaute. Hachette, Paris, 1897.TAGLIAVENTI, I.: Viollet-le-Duc e la cultura architettonica dei revivals. Patron, Bologna, 1976.VALTIERI, S.: Le Voyage d’Italie (1836-1837) di Viollet-le-Duc come esperienza fondamentale per la sua formazione da architetto, in A. M. Oteri (ed), Viollet-le-Duc e l’Ottocento. Contributi a margine di una celebrazione (1814-1879), ArcHistoR EXTRA, 1 (2017), pp. 56-81. doi: 10.14633/AHR041.VARAGNOLI, C.: “Sense and sensibility: Viollet-le-Duc e l’Italia”. Conversaciones… con Eugène Viollet-le-Duc y Prosper Mérimée, 3, luglio 2017, pp. 113-124.VINCIGUERRA, M.: Ruskin ed i preraffaeliti. Quaderni dell’Osservagtore, Milano, 1969.VIOLLET-LE-DUC, E.E.: Dictionnaire raisonnè de l’architecture française. 10 voll., A. Morel, Paris, 1854-68.VIOLLET-LE-DUC, E.E.: Entretiens sur l’architecture. 2 voll., A. Morel, Paris, 1863-1872.VIOLLET-LE-DUC, E.E.: Le Massif du Mont Blanc, J. Baudry, Paris, 1876.Viollet-le-Duc. Catalogo della mostra. Parigi, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, 19 febbraio-5 maggio 1980, Ed. de la Reunion des musees nationaux, Ministere de la Culture et de la Communication, Paris, 1980.Viollet -le-Duc e il restauro degli edifici in Francia, Electa, Milano, 1981.WALDSTEIN, C.: The work of John Ruskin, its influence on modern thought and Life. Harper and Bros, New York, 1894.WHITEHOUSE, J. H.: Ruskin Centenary Addresses. Oxford University Press, London, 1919.WISE, J. P. SMART., T. J.: A complete bibliography of the writings in prose and verse of John Ruskin. Printed for subscribers only, London, 1893
Mitomycin C in highly myopic eyes - Author reply
No full textOphthalmology. 2005 Feb;112(2):208-18; discussion 219.
Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes.
Gambato C, Ghirlando A, Moretto E, Busato F, Midena E.
SourceRefractive Surgery Service and Antimetabolite Therapy Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of topical mitomycin C in corneal wound healing (CWH) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in highly myopic eyes.
DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients affected by high (>7 diopters) myopia.
METHODS: In each patient, one eye was randomly assigned to PRK with intraoperative topical 0.02% mitomycin C application, and the fellow eye was treated with a placebo. Postoperatively, mitomycin C-treated eyes received artificial tears (3 times daily, tapered in 3 months), whereas the fellow eye was treated with fluorometholone sodium 2% and artificial tears (3 times daily, tapered in 3 months).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, manifest refraction, and biomicroscopy. Contrast sensitivity was determined using the Pelli-Robson chart. Corneal confocal microscopy documented CWH.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 12-36). No side effects or toxic effects were documented. At 12-month follow-up examination, UCVAs (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) were 0.4+/-0.48 and 0.5+/-0.53 (P = .03) in mitomycin C-treated eyes and corticosteroid-treated eyes, respectively. At 1 year, corneal haze developed in 20% of corticosteroid-treated eyes, versus 0% of mitomycin C-treated eyes. At 12, 24, and 36 months, corneal confocal microscopy showed activated keratocytes and extracellular matrix significantly more evident in untreated eyes (Ps = 0.004, 0.024, and 0.046, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Topical intraoperative application of 0.02% mitomycin C can reduce haze formation in highly myopic eyes undergoing PRK.
Comment in
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):357; author reply 357-8
L'absence : grande valse : [pour piano] / par C. Badiali ; [ill. par] H. Viollet
No full textTitre uniforme : Badiali, Constant (1865-19..). Compositeur. [L'absence. Piano]Valses (piano) -- +* 1800......- 1899......+:19e siècle:Piano, Musique de -- +* 1800......- 1899......+:19e siècle
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
A Multi-Language Comparison of Influences on Author Verification using Character N-Grams
No full textWe create a new multi-language corpus for author verification based on Wikipedia talkpages, and evaluate the influence that differences in topic and time have on character n-gram author profiles. Topic alignment between two texts is found to increase author verification precision, and an authors writing style is found to change over time, but not more significantly after 3 years than after 1 year.Information ArchitectureWISElectrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Scienc
- …
