1,721,021 research outputs found
Markerless positional verification during delivery of high-precision radiotherapy
Get PDFSlotman, B.J. [Promotor]Verbakel, W.F.A.R. [Copromotor]Dahele, M.R. [Copromotor
Towards functional organ preservation in head and neck cancer
Get PDFSlotman, B.J. [Promotor]Dahele, M.R. [Copromotor]Verbakel, W.F.A.R. [Copromotor
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy: Planning considerations, delivery accuracy and efficiency
Get PDFSenan, S. [Promotor]Slotman, B.J. [Promotor]Verbakel, W.F.A.R. [Copromotor
Radiotherapy treatment planning for head and neck cancer: Automation and improved organ at risk sparing
Get PDFSlotman, B.J. [Promotor]Verbakel, W.F.A.R. [Copromotor]Dahele, M.R. [Copromotor
A gamma-ray telescope for on-line measurement of low boron concentrations in a head-phantom for BNCT
No full textDesign of a gamma-ray analysis system for determination of boron in a patient's head during neutron irradiation
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
