186,254 research outputs found
RaudvikaSvalbard2011_Varpe.mp4
A 10-minute video illustrating the behaviour (e.g., diving, resting and social interactions) of black guillemots (Cepphus grylle) aggregated at a sea-ice ice edge in Raudvika, Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, 22 June 2011. (Filmed by Øystein Varpe.)
Part of the Supplementary material for: Varpe Ø. & Gabrielsen G.W. 2022. Aggregations of foraging black guillemots (Cepphus grylle) at a sea-ice edge in front of a tidewater glacier. Polar Research 41.
Correspondence: Øystein Varpe, University of Bergen, Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 7803, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] </p
sj-pdf-1-ccx-10.1177_10732748221102780 – Supplemental Material for Mobile-CEA – A Novel Surveillance Method for Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-ccx-10.1177_10732748221102780 for Mobile-CEA – A Novel Surveillance Method for Patients with Colorectal Cancer by Sakari Pakarinen, Pirita Varpe, Anu Carpelan, Mari Koivisto and Heikki Huhtinen in Cancer Control</p
Sea-ice Community Composition Data analysed in: Rebecca Duncan, Janne E. Søreide, Øystein Varpe, Józef Wiktor, Vanessa Pitusi, Elaine Runge, Katherina Petrou, 2023, "<b>Spatio-temporal dynamics in microalgal communities in Arctic land-fast sea ice".</b>
Sea-ice Protist Community Composition Data analysed in: Rebecca Duncan, Janne E. Søreide, Øystein Varpe, Józef Wiktor, Vanessa Pitusi, Elaine Runge, Katherina Petrou, 2023, "Spatio-temporal dynamics in microalgal communities in Arctic land-fast sea ice".</p
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
sj-pdf-2-sjs-10.1177_1457496920930142 – Supplemental material for Validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score in finnish patients: preliminary results on quality of life in different lars severity groups
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-sjs-10.1177_1457496920930142 for Validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score in finnish patients: preliminary results on quality of life in different lars severity groups by Anu Carpelan, Eeva Elamo, Jukka Karvonen, Pirita Varpe, Sami Elamo, Tero Vahlberg, Juha Grönroos and Heikki Huhtinen in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
This video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
- …
