1,733,308 research outputs found

    Index of abstracts - SA Heart Congress 2016

    Full text link
    Various Authors - Alphabetical listing of first author

    Ars Poetica

    No full text
    An investigation by various authors on the meaning of Ars Poetica. A collaborative effort

    Le Fabuliste du jeune age: choix de jolies fables et historiettes, avec leur sens moral

    No full text
    Here is a 108 page facsimile of a work first done in Paris by Denn in Paris in 1822. I ordered it as an alternative to a more version of about 1830 on ABE costing over 200.Itturnsoutthatthesearedifferenteditionswithdifferentillustrations.Afterafrontispiecetherearefivepagesfeaturingtwoillustrationseach.Theyface20,37,55,66,and92.Theroughandheavilyinkedcharacterofafacsimilelikethismakesforpoorillustrations.Thefablesarerenderedinprose.Beforetheintroduction("Meschersenfans"),thereisapageofthealphabetandseveralpagesoffrequentsyllables."Historiettes"appearon1336,followedbyfables.Producedondemand.6"x9".ThereisnoTofCorAI.Fornow,Iamhappynottohavespentthe200. It turns out that these are different editions with different illustrations. After a frontispiece there are five pages featuring two illustrations each. They face 20, 37, 55, 66, and 92. The rough and heavily inked character of a facsimile like this makes for poor illustrations. The fables are rendered in prose. Before the introduction ("Mes chers enfans"), there is a page of the alphabet and several pages of frequent syllables. "Historiettes" appear on 13-36, followed by fables. Produced on demand. 6" x 9". There is no T of C or AI. For now, I am happy not to have spent the 200!Language note: FrenchNouvelle editionVarious author

    Sense-Tagged corpora for Word Sense Disambiguation in several languages

    No full text
    Copies of Sense-Tagged corpora for Word Sense Disambiguation in several languages English, French, Spanish, Russian  </p

    Proceedings and Notes from the Soils Research and Irrigation in Canterbury one day regional workshop

    No full text
    These proceedings are intended to recover useful information and insights from Workshops in a manner that is faithful to the intent, and in an open and readily accessible manner. Frequently, Workshops of this nature present current information not otherwise published and therefore hard or impossible to find later.Analysis and report from the Workshop also available https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.145196

    Understanding Generalized Pustular Psoriasis to Improve Patient Outcomes

    No full text
    Article full text The above digital features represent the opinions of the authors. For a full list of declarations, including funding and author disclosure statements, please see the full text online: Prevalence and Disease Characteristics of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00664-x Pathophysiology of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00655-y Clinical Disease Measures in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00653-0 Treatment Options and Goals for Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00658-9 Impact of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis From the Perspective of People Living With the Condition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00663-y © The authors, CC-BY-NC 2022</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Abstracts from the 5th International Porto Congress of Multiple Sclerosis

    No full text
    Full copyright for enhanced digital features is owned by the authors. Provide enhanced digital features for this article If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced digital features for your article then please contact [email protected]. The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content. Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to: • Slide decks • Videos and animations • Audio abstracts • Audio slides</p
    corecore