1,720,993 research outputs found
On the Content and Purview of Christian Bioethics
The author argues that to explore what is distinctly Christian about
Christian bioethics requires clarity about what is Christian. He distinguishes
between the Christian (that which can be identified as authentically
Christian), Christianity (the sum of that which is authentically Christian),
and ecclesiastical traditions (the historical communities of faith and
practice that are predicated upon both Christian and extra-Christian
tradition) to critically assess what it is to be declared Christian. In
addition to exploring the role of New Testament scripture in identifying the
Christian, the author emphasizes the need to recognize the extent to which the
content of Christianity is Hebraic and Jewish
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes-- executive summary
The International Xenotransplantation Association islet xenotransplantation consensus statement describes the conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes. Chapter 1 reviews the key ethical requirements and progress toward the definition of an international regulatory framework for clinical trials of xenotransplantation. Chapters 2 to 7 provide in depth and agreed-upon recommendations on source pigs, pig islet product manufacturing and release testing, preclinical efficacy and complication data required to justify a clinical trial, strategies to prevent transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus, patient selection for clinical trials, and informed consent. It is planned to update this initial consensus statement in a year's time in light of progress in research, changes in the regulatory framework, and comments submitted after publication
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Recommended from our members
The ethics of research involving human subjects ::facing the 21st century /
- …
