1,720,980 research outputs found
A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Recommendation Techniques in the Movie Domain
No full textRecommender systems (RSs) represent one of the manifold applications in which Machine Learning can unfold its potential. Nowadays, most of the major online sites selling products and services provide users with RSs that can assist them in their online experience. In recent years, therefore, we have witnessed an impressive series of proposals for novel recommendation techniques that claim to ensure significative improvements compared to classic techniques. In this work, we analyze some of them from a theoretical and experimental point of view and verify whether they can deliver tangible real improvements in terms of performance. Among others, we have experimented with traditional model-based and memory-based collaborative filtering, up to the most recent recommendation techniques based on deep learning. We have chosen the movie domain as an application scenario, and a version of the classic MovieLens as a dataset for training and testing our models
The BCI Glossary: a first proposal for a community review
No full textThe description of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) can lead to confusion because of the high heterogeneity of devices, protocols, and applications. Besides, different professional categories are involved: end-users, clinicians, therapists, and engineers; each one having different conceptions of BCI-related terms. This can cause misunderstandings and errors, and it makes it impossible to compare different systems and their performances. The IEEE P2731 working group has been working on a standardized glossary for BCI research, together with a functional model for BCI. Here, we are presenting a first version of the BCI glossary, generated by the collective effort of the working group. One hundred fifty-three terms have been identified to be critical for describing in a standardized way BCI systems and their related aspects (e.g., the neurophysiological characteristics of the neural signals recorded). Each term has been provided with a definition, merged from multiple ones proposed by working group members, with appropriate references to the current state of the art. Finally, we are asking for feedback and suggestions about this first version of the BCI glossary to the wider community of BCI users and researchers. External inputs will improve the glossary, which will become, after further revisions, an official IEEE standard
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Optimized Collaborative Brain-Computer Interfaces for Enhancing Face Recognition
Full text linkThe aim of this study is to maximize group decision performance by optimally adapting EEG confidence decoders to the group composition. We train linear support vector machines to estimate the decision confidence of human participants from their EEG activity. We then simulate groups of different size and membership by combining individual decisions using a weighted majority rule. The weights assigned to each participant in the group are chosen solving a small-dimension, mixed, integer linear programming problem, where we maximize the group performance on the training set. We therefore introduce optimized collaborative brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), where the decisions of each team member are weighted according to both the individual neural activity and the group composition. We validate this approach on a face recognition task undertaken by 10 human participants. The results show that optimal collaborative BCIs significantly enhance team performance over other BCIs, while improving fairness within the group. This research paves the way for practical applications of collaborative BCIs to realistic scenarios characterized by stable teams, where optimizing the decision policy of a single group may lead to significant long-term benefits of team dynamics
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
