1,720,956 research outputs found
Cinematographic Shot Classification with Deep Ensemble Learning
Cinematographic shot classification assigns a category to each shot either on the basis of the field size or on the movement performed by the camera. In this work, we focus on the camera field of view, which is determined by the portion of the subject and of the environment shown in the field of view of the camera. The automation of this task can help freelancers and studios belonging to the visual creative field in their daily activities. In our study, we took into account eight classes of film shots: long shot, medium shot, full figure, american shot, half figure, half torso, close up and extreme close up. The cinematographic shot classification is a complex task, so we combined state-of-the-art techniques to deal with it. Specifically, we finetuned three separated VGG-16 models and combined their predictions in order to obtain better performances by exploiting the stacking learning technique. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in performing the classification task with good accuracy. Our method was able to achieve 77% accuracy without relying on data augmentation techniques. We also evaluated our approach in terms of f1 score, precision, and recall and we showed confusion matrices to show that most of our misclassified samples belonged to a neighboring class
Cinematographic Shot Classification through Deep Learning
Cinematographic shot classification assigns a category to each shot on the basis of the field size, which is determined by the portion of the subject and of the environment shown in the field of view of the camera. This task is very important in the context of the creative field and can help freelancers in their daily activities when it is performed automatically. Novel and effective approaches capable of processing large volumes of images/videos and analyzing them effectively are becoming increasingly important. This paper presents a data-driven methodology to automatically classify cinematographic shots through deep learning techniques. In our study, we consider four classes of film shots: full figure, half figure, half torso and close up and we discuss three different scenarios in which the proposed work can be helpful. A new dataset of images was created to evaluate performances of the proposed methodology and to compare them with state-of-the-art techniques. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in performing the classification task with good accuracy
DreamShot: Teaching Cinema Shots to Latent Diffusion Models
In recent years, several text-image synthesis models have been released that are increasingly capable of synthesizing realistic images close to the input. Among the various state-of-the-art techniques and models, the introduction of the open-source latent diffusion model Stable Diffusion has led to significant developments in text-to-image generation in recent months. By using techniques such as DreamBoot and Textual Inversion, it is possible to refine further and control the generation process to produce even more specific output than text alone would allow. We test this approach for generating three specific cinematographic shot types: Close-up, Medium Shot, and Long Shot. By fine-tuning based on Stable Diffusion 1.5 using a small dataset of 600 labelled and captioned film frames, we achieve a noticeable increase in CLIP -T and DINO scores and an overall noticeable qualitative improvement (as indicated by our human-run evaluation survey) in image likability, compliance, and shot type correctness
GINN: Towards Gender InclusioNeural Network
Today’s data driven systems and official statistics often oversimplify the concept of gender, reducing it to binary data, with far-reaching implications for policy development and equitable access to services. This simplification can lead to misclassification and discrimination against individuals who identify as non-binary. We are working to advance our research in this area to develop new, more equitable approaches that can avoid discrimination based on gender identity. Within this research framework, our primary focus is on mitigating the problem of underrepresentation and, in some cases, the complete absence of non-binary individuals in data collection. With this goal in mind, we present the GINN Gender InclusioNeural Network. This is our first attempt to develop an equitable neural network that accurately identifies gender in a multiclass context and includes individuals whose gender identity does not fall on the binary spectrum. To achieve this goal, we conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of several finetuned neural network models. Our goal was to gain a deep understanding of the crucial distinguishing features in gender identify classification and to highlight the limitation of current methods using explainable AI techniques. The initial results are promising and demonstrate the effectiveness of a fine-tuned EfficientNetB0 model in accurately categorizing images of individuals into their self-reported gender, but we are skeptical about the application in a real-world scenario because of the amount of data available about non-binary people at the moment
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
