1,721,083 research outputs found

    Crimmigration through Administrative Surveillance of Civil Society at the EU's External Borders

    No full text
    This chapter critiques the diminishing civic space for migration and asylum civil society organisations (CSOs) in Greece as an illustrative example of crimmigration through administrative surveillance. Specifically, we scrutinise a wave of registration requirements that target migration CSOs and their members in light of national constitutional law, as well as EU law, with an emphasis on fundamental rights and the rule of law. Overall, registration requirements have resulted in a major disincentive for CSOs to continue their activities in Greece, as they are unable to meet the disproportionate legal exigencies around registration. Organisations additionally face the wide discretionary power of national authorities in evaluating their supporting documentation, which constitutes a disproportionate limitation of their freedom of association. Perhaps the most visible challenge of the Greek registration framework concerns the registration of CSO members, who must provide a wide range of personal data, without corresponding data protection safeguards laid down in law. The registration framework has also indirectly affected the rights of migrants who, in an existing environment of underprovision, face additional limitations to accessing procedural rights and reception support. Finally, the registration framework, marked by legal uncertainty, raises broader rule of law adherence concerns

    Intertwining Criminal Justice and Immigration Control in the EU:Theoretical, Interdisciplinary, and Practical Perspectives

    No full text
    This introductory chapter sheds light on the evolving criminalisation of migration, or ‘crimmigration’ and its consequences, with a focus on the European Union. Crimmigration broadly encompasses the entire arsenal of coercive measures stemming from the criminal justice system and available for immigration enforcement. The chapter conceptualises the criminalisation of migration with reference to its theoretical underpinnings at the intersection of law, criminology, and philosophy, before critiquing its origin and evolution. It then scrutinises the three facets through which crimmigration manifests: The use of substantive criminal law to regulate the presence of migrants, the banalisation of detention, and the transplantation of surveillance tools to manage migration. This scrutiny highlights key legal challenges crimmigration poses, in terms of legality, fundamental rights, and rule of law adherence. Overall, crimmigration fosters the expansion of state power, without, however, the commensurate transfer of due process protections for individuals from the criminal sphere into the immigration sphere, while human rights protection standards are significantly watered down. The analysis paves the way for the other contributions in the volume, which provide a contemporary understanding of the state of the art of “crimmigration” and ultimately challenge this paradigm of intersecting criminal justice and immigration control

    Crimmigration

    No full text

    One European legal framework for surveillance:The ECtHR’s expanded legality testing copied by the CJEU

    No full text
    In this chapter, we focus on developments with regard to the legality principle in the context of surveillance in the realm of criminal law and intelligence work by secret services. A more rigorous interpretation of the legality principle in post-Klass surveillance case law certainly qualifies as one of the most remarkable developments in the European Courts’ case law on surveillance. In particular, we will show that the strict approach towards the legality requirement enshrined in Article 8 ECHR and adopted by the ECtHR in Huvig v France in the context of telephone surveillance has been reapplied in all of the following judgments of the Strasbourg Court and even adopted by the CJEU in the context of other surveillance practices
    corecore