71,830 research outputs found
Author Correction: Evaluation of skin cancer resection guide using hyper‑realistic in‑vitro phantom fabricated by 3D printing
No full textThe original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Taehun Kim which was incorrectly given as Teahun Kim. The original Article has been corrected
Anteon magnatum Kim & Lee 2013
No full text17. Anteon magnatum Kim & Lee, 2013 (Figs 1, 5) Anteon magnatum Kim & Lee 2013: 524. TL: Mt. Baegamsan (South Korea). Material examined. SOUTH KOREA: 1 ♀, [GB] Yeongyang-gun, Subi-myeon, Mt. Baegamsan, 7.V. 1999, J.W. Lee (Holotype, YNU); 1 ♀, [GW] Wonju-si, Socho-myeon, Hakgok-ri, Mt. Chiaksan National Park, 29.V– 19.VI. 2010 (MT), J.W. Lee (Paratype, YNU); 2 ♀, [CN] Seosan-si, Haemi-myeon, Hanseo Univ., 22.IV- 6.V. 2009 (MT), J.W. Lee (Paratype, YNU); 1 ♀, [GB] Gyeongju-si, Hyeongok-myeon, Namsan-ri, 18–25.VIII. 2005 (MT), J.T. Mun (Paratype, YNU); 1 ♀, [CB] Chungju-si, Jongmin-dong, Mt. Gyemyeongsan, 14.VIII. 1997, J.W. Lee (Paratype, YNU); 1 ♀, [JB] Jeongeup-si, Yongsan-dong, 19.V. 2004, K.B. Kim (Paratype, YNU); 1 ♀, [CN] Daejeon-si, Wa-dong, 36 ° 24.02 'N, 127 ° 25.98 'E, 8.VIII– 6.X. 2006, MT for edge, wild rose patch, P. Tripotin leg. (Paratype, YNU); 2 ♀, [GN] Jinju-si, Ibanseong, Daecheon, Gyeongnam For. Env. Res. Inst. 35 °09’N, 128 ° 17 ’E, 43 m, 1–16.IV. 2012 (MT), J.H. Hwang (YNU). Host. Unknown. Distribution. South Korea (Kim & Lee 2013). Remarks. The male is unknown. This species is known only from South Korea.Published as part of Kim, Chang-Jun & Lee, Jong-Wook, 2014, Check-list of Anteoninae R. Perkins, 1912 (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae) of South Korea, with description of a new species, pp. 173-192 in Zootaxa 3802 (2) on page 180, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3802.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/22890
Epanerchodus beroni Mikhaljova & Kim 1993
No full textEpanerchodus beroni Mikhaljova & Kim, 1993 Epanerchodus beroni Mikhaljova & Kim, 1993: 31 –32, 39, 40: figs 1–4. Epanerchodus beroni — Lim, 2001: 174–175, 240: figs 187–188, 55: map 50; Mikhaljova & Korsós, 2003: 234. Remarks. This epigean species is known only from the original description from Kangwon province, North Korea (Mikhaljova & Kim, 1993). Distribution. North Korea.Published as part of M, E L E N A V., Va, I K H A L J O & Lim, Kil-Young, 2006, The millipede genus Epanerchodus Attems, 1901 in the Korean Peninsula, with a description of a new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Polydesmidae), pp. 45-53 in Zootaxa 1350 on page 48, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17451
A sharp lower bound for the spectral radius in K-4-saturated graphs
No full textFor given graphs G and H, the graph G is H-saturated if G does not contain H as a subgraph but for any e is an element of E((G) over bar), G + e contains H. In this note, we prove that if G is an n-vertex Kr+1-saturated graph such that for each vertex v is an element of V (G), Sigma(w is an element of N(v)) d(G)(w) >= (r - 2)d(v) + (r - 1)(n - r + 1), then rho(G) >= rho(S-n,S-r), where S-n,S-r is the graph obtained from a copy of Kr-1 with vertex set S by adding n - r + 1 vertices, each of which has neighborhood S. This provides a sharp lower bound for the spectral radius in an n-vertex Kr+1-saturated graph for r = 2, 3, verifying a special case of a conjecture by Kim, Kim, Kostochka and O. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Video of SHINE! by Kim Scott feat. Blake Aaron and Philip N. Davis
No full textLive performance from the album release concert for "SHINE!", Kim's 5th album on the Innervision Records label. Kim Scott, flute; Phil Davis, keys; Eric Essix, guitar; Sean Michael Ray, bass; James "PJ" Spraggins, drums; Kelley Oneal, sax and flut
Benthoxynus constrictus Lee & Kim & Kim 2020, n. sp.
No full textBenthoxynus constrictus n. sp. (Figs 9, 10) http://zoobank.org/ 13B0DBCD-6362-49E6-BE95-0509CBCB4863 Material examined. Two females from washings of invertebrates at GTV1702 (19°33.387´S, 65°50.893´E, depth 2507 m), the Solitaire vent field on the Central Indian Ridge, 01 August 2017. Holotype (female, MABIK CR00244728) has been deposited in the Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK), Seocheon. Dissected paratype is retained in the collection of the junior author. Female. Body (Fig. 9A) narrow, 1.78 mm long. Prosome oviform, 930 × 750 μm. Cephalothorax 632 μm long, with tapering posterolateral corners. Second to fourth pedigerous somites with rounded posterolateral corners. Urosome (Fig. 9B) slender. Fifth pedigerous somite laterally constricted in middle, with dorsal posterolateral extensions. Genital double-somite rhomboidal, 222 × 236 μm, widest at proximal third; genital aperture located dorsolaterally slightly posterior to widest region. Three free abdominal somites 139 × 113, 90 × 100, and 90 × 102 μm, respectively. Abdominal somite and caudal rami smooth, without setules or spinules on all surfaces. Caudal rami (Fig. 9C) slightly divergent; each ramus 209 × 43 μm, 4.86 times as long as wide, armed with six setae (setae II–VII); dorsal seta located subdistally and other five setae on distal margin; two larger mid-terminal setae weakly pinnate along distal half; inner distal seta characteristically small, obscure. Rostrum absent. Antennule (Fig. 9D) 710 μm long and 12-segmented; third segment longest, with five trans- verse sclerotization bands on one surface (not shown in Fig. 9D); armature formula 1, 2, 12, 10, 2, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 + aesthetasc, and 13; aesthetasc on penultimate segment slender, slightly longer than terminal segment. Antenna (Fig. 9E) with short, unarmed syncoxa. Basis smooth. Exopod small, 19 × 9 μm, with three setae distally. Endopod 2-segmented; proximal segment 98 × 43 μm, unarmed; distal segment 72 × 35 μm, with four setae (one small inner, two subdistal, and one large distal) and several setules near base of outer subdistal seta. Oral cone stout as usual in the family. Mandible (Fig. 9F) as flattened stylet, with more than ten teeth distally and hyaline lamella along distal fourth of inner margin. Maxillule (Fig. 9G) bilobed; outer lobe with four setae (three distal and one subdistal); inner lobe with strongly protruded inner margin and four distal setae; both outer and inner lobes smooth without setules or spinules. Maxilla (Fig. 9H) 2-segmented; syncoxa unarmed, with pore at basal region; basis elongate, with fine spinules and setules at distal region, one of setules large; one large seta present, arising between syncoxa and basis. Maxilliped (Fig. 9I) 5-segmented; syncoxa with one inner distal seta of 42 μm long; basis with inner seta of 71 μm long; endopod 3-segmented, with two, one, and one setae, respectively; two setae on first endopodal segment minute, obscure; third endopodal segment 52 μm; terminal claw 174 μm long, weakly arched, with spinules along distal half of inner margin. Legs 1–4 (Figs. 10A–D) lacking inner coxal seta; outer seta on basis thin and naked; setae of these legs, especially those of endopod, swollen in proximal third and weakly pinnate in distal half. Second exopodal segment of leg 1 small, with outer spine and inner seta; all of other elements on leg 1 setiform. Inner distal seta on basis of leg 1 minute, needle-like. First endopodal segment of leg 3 unarmed, lacking inner seta. First and second endopodal FIG. 9. Benthoxynus constrictus n. sp., female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, urosome, dorsal C, caudal rami, dorsal; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, mandible; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, maxilliped. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm; B, D, E = 0.1 mm; C, F–I = 0.05 mm. FIG. 10. Benthoxynus constrictus n. sp., female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4; E, leg 5; F, right genital aperture. Scale bars: A–D = 0.1 mm; E = 0.02 mm; F = 0.05 mm. segments of leg 4 smooth, 86 × 41 and 133 × 35 μm, respectively; terminal seta 145 μm long. Armature formula of legs 1–4 as follows: Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod Leg 1: 0-0 1-1 1-1; 1-1; 3, 1, 3 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 Leg 2: 0-0 1-0 I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 Leg 3: 0-0 1-0 I-1; I-1; III, I, 5 0-0; 0-2; 1, I, 3 Leg 4: 0-0 1-0 I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 0-0; 0, I, 0 Leg 5 (Fig. 10E) 1-segmented, clearly articulated from somite, 45 × 23 μm, about twice as long as wide, with three naked setae (one dorsal and two distal). Leg 6 absent (Fig. 10F). Male. Unknown. Etymology. The specific name constrictus refers to the lateral constriction of the fifth pedigerous somite. Remarks. Benthoxynus spiculifer Humes, 1984 and B. tumidiseta Humes, 1989, the two known members of the genus, were recorded from hydrothermal vent fields in the East Pacific. These two congeners of B. constrictus n. sp. have the following features which are useful for differentiating them from the new species: (1) Leg 5 is lobate, unarticulated from the fifth pedigerous somite (vs. free in B. constrictus n. sp.). (2) The antennule is 18-segmented in B. spiculifer and 11-segmented in B. tumidiseta (vs. 12-segmented in B. constrictus n. sp.) (3) The caudal ramus is longer than that of n. sp., 240 μm in B. spiculifer and 313 μm in B. tumidiseta (Humes, 1984, 1989) (vs. 209 μm in B. constrictus n. sp.), although their bodies are smaller than that of B. constrictus n. sp. (recorded as 1.68 and 1.67 mm long, respectively, in their original descriptions). (4) The fifth pedigerous somite is not constricted laterally (vs. strongly constricted in B. constrictus n. sp.). Genus Stygiopontius Humes, 1987Published as part of Lee, Jimin, Kim, Dongsung & Kim, Il-Hoi, 2020, Copepoda (Siphonostomatoida: Dirivultidae) from Hydrothermal Vent Fields on the Central Indian Ridge, Indian Ocean, pp. 301-337 in Zootaxa 4759 (3) on pages 314-317, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4759.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/374113
Tachytes gyusanus Back & Kim, 2014, sp. n.
No full textTachytes gyusanus sp. n. Diagnosis. Vestiture on head and mesosoma golden; metasomal terga I–IV with pale yellow (tergum I) to silvery white (terga II–IV) apical setal band that are broad, about three to four × MOD. LID somewhat broad, ca. 1.5 × as long as flagellomere I (Fig. 2 I and J; Fig. 3 A). Propodeal dorsum without median longitudinal furrow or at most with a very short evanescent furrow basally; median longitudinal linear part with dense appressed setae (Fig. 3 B). Description. Female. Body length 13.5 –15.0 mm (Fig. 1 E and F). Head. MID ca. 3.2 × as long as LID (Fig. 2 I). Upper frons and vertex with both small and medium-sized punctures irregularly and densely set. Ocellar scar ca. 3.0 × as long as MOD; lower tip of ocellar scar separated from midocellus by ca. 2.0 × MOD. Clypeus ca. 2.4 × as long as broad, its apical margin between sublateral teeth broadly rounded or somewhat straight (between median notch and sublateral tooth) and slightly notched medially (Fig. 2 E), with dense medium-sized punctures regularly set. Flagellomere I ca. 2.5 × as long as broad, almost as long as flagellum II; apical flagellomere ca. 4.2 × as long as broad, almost as long as penultimate one. Frons below ocellar scar and clypeus with both dense appressed and sparser erect long golden setae (Fig. 2 J). Mesosoma. In addition to setal condition described in key, mesopleuron, propodeal dorsum and propodeal lateral face with dense erect golden setae. Mesopleuron, mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum and propodeal lateral face with dense medium-sized punctures regularly set. Propodeal impression almost an isosceles triangle in shape, and ca. 2.0 × as long as broad. Propodeal dorsum weakly reticulate. Metasoma. Lateral parts of terga II–III, lateral parts and dorsum of terga IV–V, apical parts of sterna II–V and lateral parts of sternum VI with long sparse brownish bristles. Terga I–V and sterna II–III with small punctures moderately (separating one another by puncture diameter or a little more) and regularly set; sterna IV–V with small to medium-sized punctures moderately and irregularly set; sternum VI with both sparse medium-sized and large punctures irregularly set. Pygidial plate almost an equilateral triangle in shape with apical margin shortly truncate (Fig. 3 C). Coloration. Ground color black, following parts brown to reddish brown: basal half of mandible, palpi, tegula, apical half or slightly less of all femur, all tibiae, all trochanters and spurs and spines of all legs. Male. As in female, but different in following details. Body smaller, 12.3–14.3 mm long. MID ca. 2.9 × as long as LID (Fig. 2 J). Bristles on pygidial plate pale golden. Genitalia. As in Fig. 4 H (dorsal view) and Fig. 4 I (lateral view): gonocoxite broad and tapering, without distinct tubercle in its proximal part; middle constriction of aedeagus inconspicuous. Type-specimens. Holotype. female, pinned. Original label: “Daegok-ri, Haemi-myeon, Seosan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 4.viii. 2011, Y.B. Back” [white printed label], “ HOLOTYPE / Tachytes / gyusanus / Back et Kim / sp. n. / 2014 ” [red handwritten label]. Paratypes (all are pinned and have both white printed labels of locality and collector and red handwritten labels of designation of PARATYPE). 4 ♀, 3 ♂, Sannae-ri, Moga-myeon, Icheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 18.viii. 2011 (J.K. Kim); 2 ♀, ditto, 12.viii. 2010 (Y.B. Back); 1 ♂, Boche-ri, Miyangmyeon, Anseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, collect date and collector not stated; 5 ♂, Daegok-ri, Haemi-myeon, Seosan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 4.viii. 2011 (Y.B. Back); 1 ♂, Mt. Suri, Sokdal-dong, Gunpo-si, Gyeonggi-do, 29.vii. 2008 (J.K. Kim); 2 ♀, ditto, 4.viii. 2011 (Y.B. Back); 2 ♂, Is. Guleop, Guleop-ri, Deokjeok-myeon, Ongjin-gun, Incheon Metropolitan City, 12.viii. 2010 (Y.B. Back); 1 ♀, ditto, 30.vii. 2004 (D.S. Choi); 1 ♂, Nocheon-ri, Dong-myeon, Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do, 27.vii. 2010 (E.Y. Jung); 1 ♀, ditto, 20.viii. 2001 (H.S. Lee); 1 ♀, Daeryul-ri, Daeheung-myeon, Yesan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, 9.ix. 2007 (S.B. Ha); 1 ♂, Munchon-ri, Gamgok-myeon, Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, 8.viii. 2006 (S.P. Han); 1 ♀, Waryong-dong, Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 21.viii. 2001 (J.H. Son); 1 ♀, 1 ♂, Yonsei Univ. Wonju Campus, Maeji-ri, Heungeop-myeon, Wonju-si, Gangwondo, 25.vii. 1996 (H.W. Byun). Etymology. Specific name is given in memory of the late Dr. C.W. Kim who was a founder entomologist of Hymenoptera taxonomy in Korea. GYUSAN is his added name. Distribution. South Korea. Remarks. This new species superficially resembles Tachytes modestus in setal condition and coloration (Fig. 1 D and E). However, in addition to several distinctive characteristics given in the key, male genital structure is critically different: in the new species, the distal triangular part of the aedeagus is longer in dorsal view, and the gonocoxite is broad and evenly tapering, without proximal tubercle; the corresponding part of the aedeagus is shorter and the gonocoxite is narrower and rod-shaped, with a triangular proximal tubercle in T. modestus. Setal condition of the propodeal dorsum is unique in the new species. The median longitudinal part of the propodeal dorsum is covered with dense appressed setae in the new species (Fig. 3 B), whereas the narrow median longitudinal linear area (i.e., shallow longitudinal furrow) is almost bare in the other Korean species (Fig. 3 E). This new species was very often observed on flowers of Zanthoxylum schinifolium S. et Z. (Rutaceae) during late June to early September.Published as part of Back, Yeong-Bin & Kim, Jeong-Kyu, 2014, Review of the genus Tachytes Panzer (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Crabroninae) of South Korea, with description of one new species, pp. 301-310 in Zootaxa 3795 (3) on pages 304-307, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3795.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/23030
Khoo Kay Kim, professor of Malaysian history : a biobibliometric study
No full textPresents an analysis of the publication productivity, authorship pattern, channels of communication, journal preference and language preference of Professor Dato' Khoo Kay Kim, Professor of Malaysian History in the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. The results of this biobibliometric study indicate that he can be a role model for future Malaysian historians to emulate his various achievements especially in the field of history education
Numerical investigation of the electric field distribution induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
No full textIntroduction.There has been considerable interest over the years in the treatment of serious physiological and clinical conditions, such as depression and pain relief, byutilising electromagnetic fields through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the human brain [1].Most of the effort has recently focused on the attempt to stimulate neurons deep inside the brain mass and to limit any hazards posed by this treatment. As a result, there is a need for new TMS coil configurations to generate sufficient and localized electric fields to achieve deep stimulation.The advent of more powerful computers and the emergence of more accurate models for the electric properties and shape of the human brain have enablednumerical modelling to become a significant and reliable tool for the design and optimisation of such new TMS devices in order to achieve the above requirements. The experimental prediction of the electric field distribution is still a formidable task so simulation of the fields induced inside the brain, is crucial in the optimisation and design of the stimulus coils.This paper presents results on the simulation ofTMS by using the Finite Element Method (FEM) in three dimensions and looks at the effects of the stimulation coils and geometrical model of the head on the distribution and penetration of the electric field induced in the brain during TMS. It is revealed that the incorporation of an accurate brain model in terms of shape as well as conductivity values is crucial for an improved estimation of field distribution and threshold fields inside the brain
Notoxynus tertius Kim 2000, n. sp.
No full textNotoxynus tertius n. sp. (Figures 38, 39) Material examined. Four mm, three lland one copepodid V m from the gastrovascular cavity of the mud-inhabiting sea anemone, Cerianthus ®liformis Carlgren, collected in the intertidal mud ¯at at Jakyak-do Island o Inchon, on 28 September 1996. Holotype (m), allotype (l), and three paratypes (two mm, one l) have been deposited in the US National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Dissected specimens (one adult pair and one copepodid V m) are kept in the collection of the author. Female. Body (®gure 38A) narrow, almost cylindrical, stocky, 2.39 mm long, with very thin exoskeleton. Greatest width 0.61 mm. Prosome ®ve-segmented, with faint suture line between cephalosome and ®rst pedigerous somite. Epimera of prosomal somites weakly developed. Urosome (®gure 38B) ®ve-segmented, tapering, with weak segmentation. Fifth pedigerous somite distinctly wider than genital double-somite, 358 mm wide. Genital double-somite 375Ö 296 mm (1.27:1). Genital area small, located dorsolaterally at anterior third of lateral margin. Three abdominal somites 129Ö212, 79Ö188, and 96Ö 179 mm, respectively. Posteroventral border of anal somite with minute spinules. Caudal ramus 137Ö 71 mm (1.93:1), with distinctly convex inner margin and several minute spinules on terminal margin. Caudal setae relatively short and naked. Outer lateral seta located at midlength of outer margin of caudal ramus. Rostrum semicircular and much wider than long. Antennule (®gure 38C) 487 mm long and seven-segmented. Armature formula 4, 13, 6, 3, 4 +1 aesthetasc, 2 +1 aesthetasc, and 7 +1 aesthetasc. Setae thin and naked. Antenna (®gure 38D) foursegmented, with armature formula 1, 1, 3, 6 +1 claw. Third segment very short. Terminal segment about 77Ö 34 mm (2.26:1), weakly curved. Terminal claw strongly curved. One of terminal setae very large, distinctly longer than terminal segment. Labrum (®gure 38E) deeply incised, with unornamented, weakly tapering lobes. Mandible (®gure 38F) with broad proximal notch. Terminal lash long and spinulated. Inner margin oblique to lash, with a row of setules. Maxillule (®gure 38G) a slender lobe, with two terminal, subequal setae (in copepodid V, number of these setae being three). Maxilla (®gure 38H) two-segmented. First segment unarmed. Second segment terminating in moderately long lash bearing spinules on convex margin, with one minute outer seta, one naked seta on anterior surface, and one relatively small, distally spinulated seta on concave margin. Maxilliped (®gure 38I) three-segmented. First segment unarmed and slightly longer than wide. Second segment with two simple, unequal setae on inner margin. Terminal segment blunt, tapering, with small, blunt terminal process, one small spine and one small seta. Leg 1 (®gure 39A), leg 2 (®gure 39B), and leg 3 with three-segmented rami. Leg 4 (®gure 39D) with three-segmented exopod and two-segmented endopod. Hairs on setae and segments sti and relatively thick. Second endopodal segment of leg 4 tapering, with two minute spiniform processes on outer margin; terminal two spines very unequal, inner one of which about twice as long as outer one. Armature formula of legs 1±4 as follows: Leg 5 (®gure 39E) composed of one naked seta on ®fth pedigerous and free segment. Free segment distinctly tapering, 142Ö 54 mm (2.63:1), with minute spinules on surface and two naked terminal setae (outer one 110 mm, and inner one 83 mm). Leg 6 represented by two spinules in genital area. Male. Body (®gure 39F) resembling that of female. Length 1.96 mm. Greatest width 258 mm. Urosome six-segmented, with incomplete segmentation between ®fth pedigerous somite and genital somite. Genital somite distally broadened (®gure 39G), 292Ö 296 mm. Four abdominal somites 120Ö196, 96 Ö171, 54 Ö156, and 71Ö 154 mm, respectively. Caudal ramus 113Ö 56 mm (2.02:1). Antennule with armature formula identical to that of female. Antenna with spinules on outer margin of second segment. Maxilliped (®gure 39H) consisting of three segments and terminal claw. First segment unarmed and longest. Second segment with longitudinal row of spinules and two identical setae on inner side. Third segment unarmed. Claw evenly curved, relatively large, proximally with one setule and one seta bearing spinules distally. Legs 1±4 with armature formula identical to that of female. Leg 5 identical in shape to that of female, 92 Ö 47 mm (1.96:1). Leg 6 represented by two thin setae and one minute spinule on genital ¯ap; the latter located at base of inner seta. Etymology. The speci®c name is derived from the Latin tertius, meaning`third’. The new species is named as such because it is the third known species in the genus. Remarks. Only two species of Notoxynus have been recognized: N. mundus Humes, 1975 and N. crinitus Humes, 1982. Notoxynus tertius can be easily distinguished from these two congeners by the armature on the endopod of legs. The endopod of legs 1, 3, and 4 in the new species carries, respectively, 2 spines +4 setae (II, 4), 2 spines +2 setae (II, 2), and 2 spines +3 setae. In the two congeners, these armatures are 1 spine +5 setae (I, 5), 3 spines +2 setae (III, 2), and 2 spines +1 setae (II, 1), respectively. In N. crinitus and N. mundus the maxillule bears three elements, but in N. tertius it bears only two setae. It is interesting to ®nd that the maxillule in the copepodid V of N. tertius bears three setae (not two as in the adult).Published as part of Kim, Il-Hoi, 2000, Poecilostomatoid Copepods from an Intertidal Mud Flat in the Yellow Sea, pp. 367-432 in Journal of Natural History 34 (3) on pages 428-431, DOI: 10.1080/002229300299543, http://zenodo.org/record/527953
- …
