1,720,956 research outputs found
On imbalances in multipartite multidigraphs
A k-partite r-digraph(multipartite multidigraph) (or briefly MMD)(k ≥ 3, r ≥ 1) is the result of assigning a direction to each edge of a k-partite multigraph that is without loops and contains at most r edges between any pair of vertices from distinct parts. Let D(X1, X2, ⋯, Xk) be a k-partite r-digraph with parts Xi = {xi1, xi2, ⋯, xini}, 1 ≤ i ≤ k. Let dxij + and dxij − be respectively the outdegree and indegree of a vertex xij in Xi. Define axij (or simply aij) as aij = dxij + − dxij − as the imbalance of the vertex xij, 1 ≤ j ≤ ni. In this paper, we characterize the imbalances of k-partite r-digraphs and give a constructive and existence criteria for sequences of integers to be the imbalances of some k-partite r-digraph. Also, we show the existence of a k-partite r-digraph with the given imbalance set.</p
Mark Sequences In Digraphs
In Chapter 1, we present a brief introduction of digraphs and some def-
initions. Chapter 2 is a review of scores in tournaments and oriented graphs.
Also we have obtained several new results on oriented graph scores and we
have given a new proof of Avery's theorem on oriented graph scores. In chap-
ter 3, we have introduced the concept of marks in multidigraphs, non-negative
integers attached to the vertices of multidigraphs. We have obtained several
necessary and su cient conditions for sequences of non-negative integers to
be mark sequences of some r-digraphs. We have derived stronger inequalities
for these marks. Further we have characterized uniquely mark sequences in
r-digraphs. This concept of marks has been extended to bipartite multidi-
graphs and multipartite multidigraphs in chapter 4. There we have obtained
characterizations for mark sequences in these types of multidigraphs and we
have given algorithms for constructing corresponding multidigraphs. Chap-
ter 5 deals with imbalances and imbalance sequences in digraphs. We have
generalized the concept of imbalances to oriented bipartite graphs and have
obtained criteria for a pair of integers to be the pair of imbalance sequences
of some oriented bipartite graph. We have shown the existence of an oriented
bipartite graph whose imbalance set is the given set of integers
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
On multigraphic and potentially multigraphic sequences
AbstractAn r-graph(or a multigraph) is a loopless graph in which no two vertices are joined by more than r edges. An r-complete graph on n vertices, denoted by Kn(r), is an r-graph on n vertices in which each pair of vertices is joined by exactly r edges. A non-increasing sequence π = (d1,d2,..., dn) of non-negative integers is said to be r-graphic if it is realizable by an r-graph on n vertices. An r-graphic sequence π is said to be potentially SL;M(r)-graphic if it has a realization containing SL;M(r)as a subgraph. We obtain conditions for an r-graphic sequence to be potentially S(r) L;M-graphic. These are generalizations from split graphs to p-tuple r-split graph.</jats:p
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
