1,721,169 research outputs found
A twelfth century Scottish treatise : the ordo 'Ulpianus de edendo'
AbstractThe treatise on procedure Ulpianus de edendo was written between 1168 and 1185. Its author was a Scottish churchman who also made the formulary, given by the ms. London, Brit. Libr., Harley 2355, for a lawyer in a case of a pars ecclesiae. The work borrows from Placentinus' Summa Codicis, but not by purely mechanical ways. Its style is clear, always logical, and often axiomatic, far from Bolognese traditions. The glosses, as furnished by several manuscripts, support the hypothesis of influences of the Ulpianus among English writings, maybe from the Lincoln school.
</jats:sec
Grec 2945
ULPIANUS. Commentarii in Demosthenis orationesNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.(1) Ulpiani scholia in Demosthenis orationes in Midiam ; — (44) de corona ; — (52 v°) in Aristocratem ; — (60 v°) in Timocratem ; — (77 v°) de falsa legatione ; — (111) in Leptinem ; — (134 v°) de ordinanda republica ; — (137 v°) de classibus ; — (140 v°) pro Megalopolitis ; — (143 v°) de Rhodiorum libertate ; — (147 v°) de fœdere cum AlexandroReg. 2772
Grec 2946
ULPIANUS. Commentarii in Demosthenis orationesNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.(1) Ulpiani scholia in Demosthenis orationes Olynthiacas tres ; — (39) in Philippum I. et IV ; — (53) ad Philippi epistolam ; — (56) de ordinanda republica ; — (62) de classibus ; — (68) pro Megalopolitis ; — (73 v°) pro Rhodiorum libertate ; — (80) de fœdere cum Alexandro ; — (83) de falsa legatione ; — (143) de corona ; — (160) in Midiam ; — (230) in Leptinem ; — (272) in Androtionem ; — (294 v°) in Aristocratem ; — (308 v°) in TimocratemMedic.-Reg. 2190
Zur Textkritik von Ulpianus(?), lib. sing. reg. 11,4
At the end of its treatment of agnatic kinship, in the context of tutela legitima, Ulpianus’ (?) lib. sing. reg. 11,4 names a number of relatives by way of example. The only witness of the liber, Ms. Vat. reg. lat. 1128, has a corrupted version of this list, and the editions of the liber differ in this regard. Drawing on a comparison with Gai. inst. 3,10 and Paul. Sent. 4,8,13, the contribution proposes a new emendation of the list
Specialiter autem iniuria dicitur... : iniuria-tényállások Ulpianus edictum-kommentárában
This study examines the defense of personal rights in Roman law. The basis of the research was the 10th title of the 47th book of the Digest. Most fragment of this title is from Ulpianus. Romans had a special delict for the violation of personality and they called it iniuria. They did not know the word ‘personality’. However, they realised that Roman citizens had to be defended against more than just their physical integrity. The first chapter concerns with the main elements of iniuria. The author emphasises that contumelia was the most important element of iniuria meaning the disregarding of another person’s personality. Any offense could be considered iniuria if it was committed contumeliously. In the second chapter, the author examines the specific types of iniuria. The Digest contains nominated and innominated types as well, which justifies iniuria as a diversified delict. First of all, the author analyses the classical forms of iniuria. He highlights a speech from M. Tullius Cicero (Pro Caecina) and identifies an iniuria type which was not named in the Digest. He renames it to ‘dolor imminutae libertatis’ after Cicero. It meant every offence which restricted the libertas (freedom) of a person. In this case, libertas means the exercise of a right without any restrictions. According to the author, the Digest contains a fragment that can be identified as this delict (D. 47,10,13,7)
Cnaeus Domitius Ulpianus, Institutiones. De censibus, in Scriptores iuris Romani 8, Erma di Bretschneider
This volume is the first in the SIR series dedicated to the work of Domitius Ulpianus, the most widely used jurist in the Digesta Iustiniani, which contains about 3000 fragments taken from his works. In addition to his studies, Ulpianus also held prestigious political positions, and was, for about a year, between 222 and 223 until his murder, perhaps the most powerful character of the empire and certainly the closest to the young emperor, Severus Alexander, of whom he was a kind of guardian. His death, in a conspiracy of praetorians, symbolically marks the end of the great Roman legal thought. This volume presents two of his works: the Institutiones and the De Censibus. The first identifies a crucial moment in the intellectual biography of its author and his political- cultural program: the construction of a model of legality in which the universal empire could be recognized, and which could act as an embankment against a despotic-military drift of which all dangers were glimpsed
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
