1,720,956 research outputs found
La divergenza tra il voluto e il realizzato nell’aberratio delicti e nel concorso anomalo tra difetti di coordinamento e rilievi di ordine costituzionale
Il contributo analizza il difficile rapporto sussistente tra l’aberratio delicti ed il c.d. concorso anomalo, alla luce di un’interpretazione sistematica e costituzionalmente orientata dell’impianto codicistico. In tale prospettiva, emerge un’opzione esegetica volta non solo ad evidenziare un difetto di coordinamento tra le disposizioni che regolano le due figure, ma anche a prendere consapevolezza degli inevitabili contrasti che queste, ed in particolare l’art. 116 c.p., generano con i principi fissati dalla CostituzioneThis paper analyzes the difficult relationship between the aberratio delicti and the concorso anomalo, in the light of a systematic and constitutional interpretation of the code. In this perspective an exegetical option emerges, aiming not only to highlight a lack of coordination between the provisions regulating the two, but also to become aware of the inevitable contrasts that these, and in particular the art. 116 c.p., generate with the principles established by the Constitutio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Il delitto di sottrazione fraudolenta al pagamento delle imposte: determinatezza e offensività al cospetto del bene giuridico
La formulazione e l’interpretazione del delitto di sottrazione fraudolenta al pagamento di imposte (art. 11 D.lgs. n. 74 del 2000) oscillano tra contrapposte esigenze di garantismo e repressione. Le criticità esegetico-applicative sono acuite dal particolarismo tecnico che caratterizza il settore penal-tributario, storicamente poco incline ad una ricezione piena dei principi di forgia penalistica. In tale contesto, nonostante si assista ad alcuni apprezzabili esempi di buona nomofilachia, si impone una valorizzazione dei principi costituzionali di offensività e determinatezza nell’ottica di scongiurare, in via ermeneutica, un’applicazione “totale” della fattispecie criminosa contrastante con le istanze garantistiche connaturate ad un autentico diritto penale del fatto
La prescrizione dell’illecito dell’ente. Alla ricerca di una lettura ragionevole tra inquadramenti sistematici, dato positivo e limiti costituzionali
Il contributo analizza la disciplina della prescrizione dell’illecito da reato di cui all’art. 22 d. lgs. n. 231 del 2001, nell’ottica di valutare la sua coerenza con riferimento alla cornice normativa del Decreto 231,
e la sua ragionevolezza rispetto alla vigente regolamentazione del codice penale. In tale prospettiva emerge una disciplina alquanto singolare, che, oltre ad essere inidonea a fornire adeguate opzioni interpretative sul versante dogmatico, svela una forte divergenza rispetto a quella della prescrizione del reato; divergenza non giustificabile alla luce della dominanza genetica marcatamente penalistica che qualifica l’illecito dell’ente. Di qui un momento di frizione con l’art. 3 Cost., che risulta solo parzialmente attenuato dalla recente riforma della prescrizione del reato attuata con la l. n. 3 del 2019.This paper analyses the discipline of the statute of limitations on offence resulting from a crime pursuant to art. 22 d. lgs. n. 231 of 2001, with the aim of evaluating his coherence with reference to the legislative framework of the Decreto 231, and his reasonableness regarding the current regulation of the Italian criminal code. In this perspective a very peculiar discipline emerges, which, besides being unhelpful in giving adequate interpretative options on the dogmatic side, reveals a strong divergence with respect to the discipline of the statute of limitations on crimes: a divergence that has no justification in the light of the criminal genetic dominance that qualify the offence of the company. Hence, a contrast with the art. 3 Cost. arises, which is only partially mitigated by the recent reformation of the statute of limitations on crime, introduced by Law n. 3 of 2019
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
