1,720,985 research outputs found
Le traducteur et le dictionnaire bilingue. Équivalents de « za » spatial dans les dictionnaires polonais-français
No full textTranslator and bilingual dictionary. Equivalents for the spatial preposition za in the Polish-French dictionariesThe author analyses fragments of entries devoted to the preposition za in its spatial use found in fourteen contemporary Polish-French general dictionaries of different sizes. A general conclusion from the analysis is that, due to significant gaps in the inventory of equivalents and in exemplification, none of the fragments dealing with za makes it possible for native speakers of Polish to select the correct French equivalent of the preposition za in its spatial meaning. That is why the author presents his own proposal of a relevant entry dealing with za prepared with Polish language users in mind.Translator and bilingual dictionary. Equivalents for the spatial preposition za in the Polish-French dictionariesThe author analyses fragments of entries devoted to the preposition za in its spatial use found in fourteen contemporary Polish-French general dictionaries of different sizes. A general conclusion from the analysis is that, due to significant gaps in the inventory of equivalents and in exemplification, none of the fragments dealing with za makes it possible for native speakers of Polish to select the correct French equivalent of the preposition za in its spatial meaning. That is why the author presents his own proposal of a relevant entry dealing with za prepared with Polish language users in mind
Les marques d’usage dans les dictionnaires bilingues français-polonais et polonais-français
Get PDFLabels in bilingual French-Polish and Polish-French dictionaires The article is an analysis of labels used in eighteen general Polish-French and French-Polish dictionaries that have been published over the last forty years. The author wants to find out whether the analysed dictionaries have the same labels and whether the labels are defined, which would make it possible to regard them as terms. The inventory of labels, compiled on the basis of information contained in the introductions to the dictionaries and on the basis of lists of abbreviations, is divided into seven thematic groups. The author focuses in particular on the chronological, geographical, stylistic and expressive labels. Within each of these groups the Polish labels are confronted with the Polish lexicographic practice and the French labels – with the French practice. Finally both lists – Polish and French – are compared in terms of equivalence. The analysis shows that the bilingual dictionaries examined by the author usually do not explain the rules of labelling words and do not define precisely the meanings of labels used, though some of the modern monolingual dictionaries could be regarded as positive examples in this respect. In addition, authors of bilingual dictionaries seem to be limited in their use of the latest methodological proposals presented in the extensive literature on the subject. Consequently, the inventory of Polish terms used as labels in bilingual dictionaries only partially corresponds to the list of labels used nowadays in Polish language dictionaries.Labels in bilingual French-Polish and Polish-French dictionaires The article is an analysis of labels used in eighteen general Polish-French and French-Polish dictionaries that have been published over the last forty years. The author wants to find out whether the analysed dictionaries have the same labels and whether the labels are defined, which would make it possible to regard them as terms. The inventory of labels, compiled on the basis of information contained in the introductions to the dictionaries and on the basis of lists of abbreviations, is divided into seven thematic groups. The author focuses in particular on the chronological, geographical, stylistic and expressive labels. Within each of these groups the Polish labels are confronted with the Polish lexicographic practice and the French labels – with the French practice. Finally both lists – Polish and French – are compared in terms of equivalence. The analysis shows that the bilingual dictionaries examined by the author usually do not explain the rules of labelling words and do not define precisely the meanings of labels used, though some of the modern monolingual dictionaries could be regarded as positive examples in this respect. In addition, authors of bilingual dictionaries seem to be limited in their use of the latest methodological proposals presented in the extensive literature on the subject. Consequently, the inventory of Polish terms used as labels in bilingual dictionaries only partially corresponds to the list of labels used nowadays in Polish language dictionaries
Les listes de noms propres dans les dictionnaires généraux polonais-français et français-polonais
No full textLISTS OF PROPER NOUNS IN POLISH-FRENCH AND FRENCH-POLISH GENERAL DICTIONARIES The paper deals with the lists of proper names found in 22 Polish-French and/or French-Polish dictionaries out of the 45 dictionaries investigated, including dictionaries of different sizes published over the last 150 years. The lists most often include geographical names, gentilics and first names. A popular practice is to include certain items in the main body of the dictionary and to list other items in appendices; sometimes, these two sets of proper names overlap, which is incoherent. In addition to the quite evident information on spelling, the analysed lists may provide phonetic, grammatical, stylistic or encyclopedic data. However, the accumulation of such information, very valuable for users, transforms the lists into a succession of entries. That is why, instead of striving for originality by putting together lists of such exotic terms as Zodiac signs or celestial bodies, it would be better to incorporate proper names into the macrostructure.LISTS OF PROPER NOUNS IN POLISH-FRENCH AND FRENCH-POLISH GENERAL DICTIONARIES The paper deals with the lists of proper names found in 22 Polish-French and/or French-Polish dictionaries out of the 45 dictionaries investigated, including dictionaries of different sizes published over the last 150 years. The lists most often include geographical names, gentilics and first names. A popular practice is to include certain items in the main body of the dictionary and to list other items in appendices; sometimes, these two sets of proper names overlap, which is incoherent. In addition to the quite evident information on spelling, the analysed lists may provide phonetic, grammatical, stylistic or encyclopedic data. However, the accumulation of such information, very valuable for users, transforms the lists into a succession of entries. That is why, instead of striving for originality by putting together lists of such exotic terms as Zodiac signs or celestial bodies, it would be better to incorporate proper names into the macrostructure
La préposition za au sens temporel dans les dictionnaires généraux polonais-français
No full textTHE PREPOSITION ZA IN ITS TEMPORAL USE IN THE GENERAL POLISH-FRENCH DICTIONARIESThe paper analyses fragments of entries devoted to the preposition za in its temporal use found in sixteen contemporary Polish-French general dictionaries of different sizes. A general conclusion from the analysis is that, due both to inappropriate construction of these entries and to significant gaps in the inventory of equivalents and in exemplification, none of the fragments dealing with za makes it possible for native speakers of Polish to select the correct French equivalent of the preposition za in its temporal meaning.THE PREPOSITION ZA IN ITS TEMPORAL USE IN THE GENERAL POLISH-FRENCH DICTIONARIESThe paper analyses fragments of entries devoted to the preposition za in its temporal use found in sixteen contemporary Polish-French general dictionaries of different sizes. A general conclusion from the analysis is that, due both to inappropriate construction of these entries and to significant gaps in the inventory of equivalents and in exemplification, none of the fragments dealing with za makes it possible for native speakers of Polish to select the correct French equivalent of the preposition za in its temporal meaning
Les images de la tridimensionnalité du corps humain vues à travers les expressions figées françaises et polonaises
Get PDFIn this article Witold Ucherek compared Polish and French idiomatic expressions including body parts, the meaning of which revealed topographic sems embodied in the structure of somatisms. The list of mentioned expressions was created on the basis of monolingual and bilingual phraseological dictionaries. The conducted analysis revealed strong similarities between Polish and French, as far as the way of expressing the communicational content of the analysed idiomatic expressions was concerned.In this article Witold Ucherek compared Polish and French idiomatic expressions including body parts, the meaning of which revealed topographic sems embodied in the structure of somatisms. The list of mentioned expressions was created on the basis of monolingual and bilingual phraseological dictionaries. The conducted analysis revealed strong similarities between Polish and French, as far as the way of expressing the communicational content of the analysed idiomatic expressions was concerned
Les équivalents lexicographiques français de la préposition spod1
No full textFrench lexicographical equivalents of the preposition spod
The paper analyses the lexicographical entries devoted to the Polish preposition spod (‘from under’) found in twenty five Polish-French general dictionaries of different sizes published in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st centuries. A general conclusion from this comparative analyses is that, due to both inappropriate
construction of these entries and significant gaps in the inventory of equivalents and in their exemplification, none of the consulted dictionaries
makes it possible for Polish native speakers to select the correct French equivalent(s) of the preposition spod in a given type of context
À la recherche du participe perdu: „Le participe retrouvé. Grand corpus étiqueté sur le participe passé”, par Fabrice Marsac et Jean-Christophe Pellat, L’Harmattan, Paris 2018
No full textLes dictionnaires et l’emprunt. XVIe–XXIe siècle, dir. Agnès Steuckardt, Odile Leclercq, Aïno Niklas-Salminen et Mathilde Thorel, collection Langues et langage, Publications de l’Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence 2011
No full textL’incontournable emprunt: „L’emprunt en question(s). Conceptions, réceptions, traitements lexicographiques”, sous la direction d’Alicja Kacprzak, Radka Mudrochová et Jean-François Sablayrolles, Éditions Lambert-Lucas, coll. « La Lexicothèque », Limoges 2019
Get PDFAu coeur des dictionnaires bilingues: Le dictionnaire bilingue. Un miroir éformant ?, par Dangoulė Melnikienė, Hermann Éditeurs, Paris 2013
No full text- …
