1,721,027 research outputs found
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Spring/Summer 2021
Full text linkThis editon of UNH Magazine was digital only due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This is an archived version of web content originally found at https://magazine.unh.edu
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Spring/Summer 2020
Full text linkThis editon of UNH Magazine was digital only due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This is an archived version of web content originally found at https://magazine.unh.edu
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Fall 2020
Full text linkThis editon of UNH Magazine was digital only due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This is an archived version of web content originally found at https://magazine.unh.edu
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Winter 2022
Full text linkThis editon of UNH Magazine was digital only due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This is an archived version of web content originally found at https://magazine.unh.edu
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Winter 2021
Full text linkThis editon of UNH Magazine was digital only due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This is an archived version of web content originally found at https://magazine.unh.edu
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Winter 2014
Full text linkArchived version of web content originally found at https://unhmagazine.unh.edu/pastissues.htm
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Spring 2004
Full text linkArchived version of web content originally found at https://unhmagazine.unh.edu/pastissues.htm
UNH: The Magazine of the University of New Hampshire, Winter 2009
Full text linkArchived version of web content originally found at https://unhmagazine.unh.edu/pastissues.htm
- …
