1,720,964 research outputs found
Frequencies assessment of loss containments including the effects of measures of riskprevention and mitigation.
Ground influence on high-pressure methane jets: Different concentration clouds scenarios
Because of their relevant consequences (in particular, associated with domino effect), accidental highpressure flammable gas releases are one of the major hazards in the industrial safety framework. It is likely that the accidental loss of containment can involve obstacles that, as a matter of fact, are present in any process facility. As obstacle, flat surfaces (e.g., walls, ground, etc.), equipment (e.g., tanks, pipes, etc.) or structures can be counted. Focusing on the scenario of an accidental high-pressure unignited methane jet interacting with an obstacle, this work investigates how the proximity to the ground influences the jet cloud extent when considering different concentrations of methane in air. Varying the height above the ground of the source term, the effect of the ground was systematically studied through an extensive Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis. Thanks to the sensitivity analysis performed, the main achievement is the demonstration that methane releases observed at different concentrations in air, from sources at different pressures and outflowing from accidental holes of different sizes are similarly influenced by the ground presence. The conclusion of the present work is that, the assessment of the hazardous area extent of the flammable release at any concentration of interest can be evaluated exploit an analytical model specifically derived, providing a useful alternative of practical precision to more expensive CFD computations. This way, for this specific accidental scenario, delineating the area involved within the flammability limits become easier and faster
Consequences assessment of an accidental toxic gas release through a cfd tool: Effect of the terrain and major obstacles
The main aim of this study is the establishment of a new methodology for the assessment of terrain and structures geometry effects on gas dispersion. Significant obstacles (such as the plant structures, buildings, or the terrain elevation) play a major role in gas dispersion, due to the eddies, wakes, stagnation and recirculation points they can introduce. A comparison between CFD simulations and integral model predictions have been worked out for a realistic case-study in order to point geometry role in gas dispersion. Moreover, obstacles and terrain geometries are often not available in a suitable format. The proposed methodology uses easy-accessible data (such as SRTM data and geo-referenced aerial photography) to work out the required inputs, to reduce the time and cost associated to CFD modelling and make it practically applicable in industrial cases (design of new installations or assessment of existing ones)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
