1,720,961 research outputs found

    Share a pie? Privacy-preserving knowledge base export through count-min sketches

    No full text
    Knowledge base (KB) sharing among parties has been proven to be beneficial in several scenarios. However such sharing can arise considerable privacy concerns depending on the sensitivity of the information stored in each party’s KB. In this paper, we focus on the problem of exporting a (part of a) KB of a party towards a receiving one. We introduce a novel solution that enables parties to export data in a privacy-preserving fashion, based on a probabilistic data structure, namely the count-min sketch. With this data structure, KBs can be exported in the form of key-value stores and inserted into a set of count-min sketches, where keys can be sensitive and values are counters. Count-min sketches can be tuned to achieve a given key collision probability, which enables a party to deny having certain keys in its own KB, and thus to preserve its privacy. We also introduce a metric, the γ-deniability (novel for count-min sketches), to measure the privacy level obtainable with a count-min sketch. Furthermore, since the value associated to a key can expose to linkage attacks, noise can be added to a count-min sketch to ensure controlled error on retrieved values. Key collisions and noise alter the values contained in the exported KB, and can affect negatively the accuracy of a computation performed on the exported KB. We explore the tradeoff between privacy preservation and computation accuracy by experimental evaluations in two scenarios related to malware detection

    Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Malware Analysis

    Get PDF
    Coping with malware is getting more and more challenging, given their relentless growth in complexity and volume. One of the most common approaches in literature is using machine learning techniques, to automatically learn models and patterns behind such complexity, and to develop technologies for keeping pace with the speed of development of novel malware. This survey aims at providing an overview on the way machine learning has been used so far in the context of malware analysis. We systematize surveyed papers according to their objectives (i.e., the expected output, what the analysis aims to), what information about malware they specifically use (i.e., the features), and what machine learning techniques they employ (i.e., what algorithm is used to process the input and produce the output). We also outline a number of problems concerning the datasets used in considered works, and finally introduce the novel concept of malware analysis economics, regarding the study of existing tradeoffs among key metrics, such as analysis accuracy and economical costs

    An Architecture for Semi-Automatic Collaborative Malware Analysis for CIs

    No full text
    Critical Infrastructures (CIs) are among the main targets of activists, cyber terrorists and state sponsored attacks. To protect itself, a CI needs to build and keep updated a domestic knowledge base of cyber threats. It cannot indeed completely rely on external service providers because information on incidents can be so sensible to impact national security. In this paper, we propose an architecture for a malware analysis framework to support CIs in such a challenging task. Given the huge number of new malware produced daily, the architecture is designed so as to automate the analysis to a large extent, leaving to human analysts only a small and manageable part of the whole effort. Such a non-automatic part of the analysis requires a wide range of expertise, usually contributed by more analysts. The architecture enables analysts to work collaboratively to improve the understanding of samples that demand deeper investigations (intra-CI collaboration). Furthermore, the architecture allows to share partial and configurable views of the knowledge base with other interested CIs, in order to collectively obtain a more complete vision of the cyber threat landscape (inter-CI collaboration)

    The goods, the bads and the uglies: Supporting decisions in malware detection through visual analytics

    No full text
    Malware associated with Web downloads is responsible for many attacks trying to execute malicious code on a remote machine. Web browsers are protected by anti-malware utilities that try to distinguish between good downloads and bad downloads, blocking the bad ones and alerting the user. In order to cope with the uncertainty of such a process, very often the final decision is made using suitable thresholds, giving rise to a 3 categories classification: good downloads, bad downloads, and “in the middle” downloads (i.e., the uglies). In this situation, it is possible to involve the user (e.g., the security manager) in the decision loop, presenting him with the details of the decision process in a way he can either be more confident about the system decisions or he can refine what has been done automatically, e.g., promoting an ugly download to a good one. The paper addresses this problem presenting a visual analytics solution supporting the analysis of the classification system presented in AMICO [24], providing the user with a better understanding of the classification decisions and the possibility of changing the classification results. A prototype is available at: http://awareserver.dis.uniroma1.it:11768/malvis/

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Towards the usage of invariant-based app behavioral fingerprinting for the detection of obfuscated versions of known malware

    No full text
    App fingerprints can be used to verify whether two apps are the same, and are useful tools for malware detection because they can allow to recognize obfuscated versions of known malware. Fingerprinting an app on the base of static features is known to fail against obfuscation, as it is successful in hiding the static characteristics that reveal the malicious nature of an app. In this paper we propose a novel way to compute app fingerprints, which is based on behavioral features. The aim is to capture the semantics of the app, so that obfuscation results ineffective. The technique we introduce exploits invariants, found among pairs of metrics, collected during app execution, and produces a fingerprint consisting of the list of the correlation values of these pairs. We present an experimental evaluation carried out on a real Android device, whose obtained results support the methodology we propose, and show it can be a viable research direction to investigate further

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore