186,208 research outputs found
Appendage Regeneration in Vertebrates: What Makes This Possible?
The ability to regenerate amputated or injured tissues and organs is a fascinating property shared by several invertebrates and, interestingly, some vertebrates. The mechanism of evolutionary loss of regeneration in mammals is not understood, yet from the biomedical and clinical point of view, it would be very beneficial to be able, at least partially, to restore that capability. The current availability of new experimental tools, facilitating the comparative study of models with high regenerative ability, provides a powerful instrument to unveil what is needed for a successful regeneration. The present review provides an updated overview of multiple aspects of appendage regeneration in three vertebrates: lizard, salamander, and zebrafish. The deep investigation of this process points to common mechanisms, including the relevance of Wnt/β-catenin and FGF signaling for the restoration of a functional appendage. We discuss the formation and cellular origin of the blastema and the identification of epigenetic and cellular changes and molecular pathways shared by vertebrates capable of regeneration. Understanding the similarities, being aware of the differences of the processes, during lizard, salamander, and zebrafish regeneration can provide a useful guide for supporting effective regenerative strategies in mammals
An N-terminal G11A mutation in HOXD13 causes synpolydactyly and interferes with Gli3R function during limb pre-patterning.
Synpolydactyly (SPD) is a distal limb anomaly characterized by incomplete digit separation and the presence of supernumerary digits in the syndactylous web. This phenotype has been associated with mutations in the homeodomain or polyalanine tract of the HOXD13 gene. We identified a novel mutation (G11A) in HOXD13 that is located outside the previously known domains and affects the intracellular half life of the protein. Misexpression of HOXD13(G11A) in the developing chick limb phenocopied the human SPD phenotype. Finally, we demonstrated through in vitro studies that this mutation has a destabilizing effect on GLI3R uncovering an unappreciated mechanism by which HOXD13 determines the patterning of the limb
A G220V substitution within the N-terminal transcription regulating domain of HOXD13 causes a variant synpolydactyly phenotype
The 5' members of the HoxD gene cluster (paralogous groups 9-13) are crucial for correct vertebrate limb patterning. Mutations in the HOXD13 gene have been found to cause synpolydactyly (SPD) and other limb malformations in human. We report the identification in a Greek family of a variant form of SPD caused by a novel missense mutation that substitutes glycine for valine in position 220 (G220V) of HOXD13. This mutation represents the first substitution of an amino acid located outside of the HOXD13 homeodomain that causes autopodal limb malformations. We have characterized this mutation at the molecular level and found that the G220V substitution causes a significant impairment of the capacity of HOXD13 to bind DNA and regulate transcription. HOXD13(G220V) was found to be deficient in both activating and repressing transcription through HOXD13-responsive regulatory elements. In accordance with these results, a comparison of the activities of HOXD13 and HOXD13(G220V) in vivo, using retrovirus-mediated misexpression in developing chick limbs, showed that the G220V mutation impairs the capacity of HOXD13 to perturb the development of proximal limb skeletal elements and to ectopically activate the transcription of the Hand2 target gene. We moreover show that the G220V mutation compromises the stability of the HOXD13 protein within cells and causes its partial accumulation in the cytosol in the form of subtle aggregates. Taken together, our results establish that the G220V substitution does not produce a dominant-negative effect or a gain-of-function, but represents a dominant loss-of-function mutation revealing haploinsufficiency of HOXD13 in human
Noggin inactivation affects the number and differentiation potential of muscle progenitor cells in vivo
Inactivation of Noggin, a secreted antagonist of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), in mice leads, among others, to severe malformations of the appendicular skeleton and defective skeletal muscle fibers. To determine the molecular basis of the phenotype, we carried out a histomorphological and molecular analysis of developing muscles Noggin(-/-) mice. We show that in 18.5 dpc embryos there is a marked reduction in muscle fiber size and a failure of nuclei migration towards the cell membrane. Molecularly, the absence of Noggin results in an increased BMP signaling in muscle tissue as shown by the increase in SMAD1/5/8 phosphorylation, concomitant with the induction of BMP target genes such as Id1, 2, 3 as well as Msx1. Finally, upon removal of Noggin, the number of mesenchymal Pax7(+) muscle precursor cells is reduced and they are more prone to differentiate into adipocytes in vitro. Thus, our results highlight the importance of Noggin/BMP balance for myogenic commitment of early fetal progenitor cells.sponsorship: This research was supported by a research grant from FWO G.0214.07 to PT and HM and IWT grant to HM. MS has been supported with the contribution of "Opening The Future" Campaign (EJJ-OPTFUT-02010), CARIPLO 2015_0634, FWO (#G060612N, #G0A8813N, #G088715N), GOA (EJJ-C2161-GOA/11/012), and OT#09-053 (EJJ-C0420-OT/09/053). DC is supported by University of Turin, Italy. In addition, PT and MS are recipient of the Interuniversity Attraction Poles grant, IUAP-VII/07 (EJJ-C4851-17/07-P). We thank Inge Van Hoven for excellent mouse husbandry, Christina Vochten and Vicky Raets for professional administrative assistance. We would also like Rondoufonds voor Duchenne Onderzoek for kind donation. (FWO|G.0214.07, FWO|G060612N, FWO|G0A8813N, FWO|G088715N, IWT grant, "Opening The Future" Campaign|EJJ-OPTFUT-02010, CARIPLO|2015_0634, GOA|EJJ-C2161-GOA/11/012, University of Turin, Italy, Interuniversity Attraction Poles grant|IUAP-VII/07, Interuniversity Attraction Poles grant|EJJ-C4851-17/07-P, 09-053, EJJ-C0420-OT/09/053)status: Publishe
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
This video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
- …
