167,139 research outputs found
[Letter from Armando V. Rodriguez to John J. Herrera - January 14, 1974]
No full textLetter from Judge Armando V. Rodriguez to John J. Herrera, thanking him for his support and friendship, and wishing him all happiness in 1974
Jose E. D. Rodriguez
No full textPhotograph shows Jose E. D. Rodriguez, as an elderly man, wearing chaps and standing with his horse
10-0666 THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS v. RODRIGUEZ
No full text10-0666 City of Round Rock, et al. v. Jaime Rodriguez, et al. from Travis County and the Third District Court of Appeals, Austin For petitioners: Douglas W. Alexander, Austin For respondents: Craig Deats, Austin The issue is whether the Texas Labor Code
Eremidrilus Fend & Rodriguez 2003
No full textGenus Eremidrilus Fend & Rodriguez, 2003 Diagnosis (from Fend & Rodriguez 2020): Small or medium-sized worms with a filiform proboscis. Body wall unpigmented and bearing secondary annuli. Posterior lateral blood vessels absent. Nephridia absent from preclitellar segments. Testes paired in both IX and X. One pair of ovaries in XI. One pair of elongate-cylindrical or club-shaped atria in X, each with one pair of functional vasa deferentia, serving funnels on 9/10 and 10/11. Male pores usually on broad, folded porophores posterior to ventral chaetae in X, on or slightly lateral to chaetal lines. Spermathecae paired in XI or in both XI and XII. Spermathecal pores posterior to chaetae, with transverse position ranging from ventral chaetal lines to lateral lines. Key to described Eremidrilus species 1 One pair of spermathecae only, in XI (Fig. 7 in present publication)............................................. 2 - Two pairs of spermathecae, in XI and XII (Fig. 11 in Fend & Rodriguez 2020).................................... 8 2 Spermathecal pores midlateral or distinctly lateral to ventral bundles of chaetae................................... 3 - Spermathecal pores in line with or slightly lateral to ventral bundles of chaetae.................................... 5 3 Spermathecal pores each in a deep cavity, associated with extensive musculature; may be everted to form a porophore. Male and spermathecal porophores more than 100 µm in diameter. Atrium club-shaped, length usually 2–3 times the porophore width, 2/3 body diameter. (Pacific Coastal drainages, Central California to southern Oregon.).................................................................................................. E. felini Fend & Rodriguez, 2003 - Spermathecal pores simple, not on porophores, in a shallow depression at most, at level of lateral line.................. 4 4 Atrium club-shaped, about 4 times longer than wide, and the length 2–3 times the porophore width; male porophore low and rounded (length <diameter). (Coast Range, central California.)..................... E. ritocsi Fend & Rodriguez, 2003 - Atrium cylindrical with very narrow diameter, about 8 times longer than wide, and the length 6 times the porophore width. Male pores open in long, protrusible porophores, narrowly conical when fully extended. (Northern Nevada to southwestern Idaho.)...................................................................................... E. owyhee n. sp. 5 Spermathecal pores surrounded by a ring of small glands, spermathecal duct short (0.1–0.2 body diameter) and ampulla elongate.Atrium length about half body diameter, male pores on dome-shaped porophores. Nephridia with prominent ectal vesicles. (Chalone Creek, central California.)..................................................... E. chalonensis n. sp. - Spermathecal pores not surrounded by glands.............................................................. 6 6 Spermathecal duct length about twice the diameter of the ampulla, or about equal to the body diameter, usually penetrating the posterior septum 11/12. Atria cylindrical, 4–8 times the male porophore width, length usually more than 2/3 the diameter of the body. (Coast Range, central California.)....................................... E. elegans Fend & Rodriguez, 2003 - Spermathecal duct shorter than the diameter of the ampulla, about 1/4 to 1/2 the diameter of the body, gradually narrowing towards the pore. Atria club-shaped and located entirely in X.................................................. 7 7 Body diameter at X 0.6–0.9 mm. Spermathecal pores slightly lateral to the ventral chaetal line, at most 1/2 the distance to the lateral line. Spermathecal duct to body diameter ratio: 0.2–0.5. Atrium length 4–6 times the porophore width; porophore large (width 60–100 µm). (Coyote Creek, Coast Range, central California.)................ E. coyote Fend & Rodriguez, 2003 - Body diameter at X 0.3–0.5 mm. Spermathecal pores close to the line of ventral chaetae. Spermathecal ducts short (ratio to body diameter 0.1–0.2). Atrium length 5–7 times the porophore width. Porophore small (24–45 µm wide). (Smith River, northern California.)............................................................................. E. pinedai n. sp. 8 Male pore opening on a small papilla, porophores inconspicuous or absent. Spermathecal pores close to posterior septum of the segment. (Eureka Creek, Montana)...................................... E. montanensis Fend & Rodriguez, 2020 - Male pores opening on distinct porophores................................................................. 9 9 Male pore opening on a small, conical papilla within a ring shaped, concave male porophore. Spermathecal pores very posterior in the segment. Atrium very long (2/3 the body diameter or more) and wide in ental part (ampulla diameter about 1/3 atrium length), with thick (up to 42 µm) atrial muscular layer, duct narrow and clearly distinct from the ampulla. (Idaho.)................................................................................ E. artzaini Fend & Rodriguez, 2020 - Atrium club-shaped, duct not clearly distinct from ampulla; atrial musculature <10 µm............................ 10 10 Atrium long (about the diameter of the body or even longer). Spermathecal pores mid-way between ventral bundles of chaetae and septum. (Tennessee, cave.)................................................. E. allegheniensis (Cook, 1971) - Atrium short (about half the diameter of body or less). At least the second pair of spermathecal pores in the segment XII, close to septum 12/13..................................................................................... 11 11 Broad male porophore, atrium length about 1/3 body diameter. Vasa deferentia open subapically to the atrial lumen. (Malad River drainage, Idaho.)................................................. E. humboldti Fend & Rodriguez, 2020 - Narrow, cylindrical male porophore. Atrium length about 1/2 body diameter. Vasa deferentia open to the atrial lumen about medially. (Gila River drainage, New Mexico.).................................... E. gilita Fend & Rodriguez, 2020Published as part of Rodriguez, Pilar & Fend, Steven V., 2022, New Nearctic Eremidrilus species (Clitellata: Lumbriculidae). Part 2, western species with one spermathecal segment, pp. 245-264 in Zootaxa 5159 (2) on pages 263-264, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5159.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/677713
Dolores Rodriguez interview, 2010
No full textRodriguez, Dolores - Oral History Interview - CSWA ❧ An interview with Dolores Rodriguez, MSW, as she discusses her development as a Latina social worker (1957-present), the first ever Chicano/Latino Adoptions Unit in Los Angeles County, pivotal programs she was involved with, and opportunities for practice in the field. Interviewer: Carlos Sosa, MSW. Date: 6/30/10. Dolores Rodriguez. Interviewed by Carlos Sosa. Date of interview: 6-30-10. Length of interview: 1 hour and 7 minutes. ❧ CONTENTS: (01:20)- Initial Professional Training. (04:15)- Latino children and child welfare. (07:55)- Los Angeles and the adoptions arena. (11:12)- Los Angeles County and the first Chicano/Latino Adoptions Unit. (18:45)- Wednesday's Child. (19:40)- Chicano/Latino Unit program supporters. (21:10)- Chicano/Latino Unit recruitment. (24:30)- Worker's perceptions of adoptive families. (27:45)- Internal opposition to the Chicano/Latino specialized unit. (30:50)- Initial community response to Chicano/Latino adoptions program. (34:35)- Family life and role models. (40:30)- Difference between education and social work in confronting social issues. (43:12)- Post retirement and most memorable parts of career. (55:30)- Impact of merger between Department of Adoptions and DCFS. (1:02:00)- Regrets?. ❧ ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: 1. California Social Work Hall of Distinction Biography ( http://socialworkhallofdistinction.usc.edu/honorees/ ). 2. DVD containing interview
Rodriguez v. United States
No full textRodriguez v. United States explores the use of drug detection dogs by police officers while conducting routine stopDrug Detection, Dog Sniff, Consents. It examines the citizen\u27s interest in privacy as opposed to the benefit to police of drug detection. Rodriguez argues that his traffic stop by police was complete but was unreasonably prolonged after he denied consent to a dog sniff of his car, and that the wait for a backup officer to arrive at the scene was beyond reasonable. The state argues that the delay was short and, therefore, the stop was reasonable. Since a drug detection dog is only trained to detect contraband, the invasion of privacy is minimal. This presentation examines both arguments that are before the Supreme Court of the United States and the implications for society
Marriage License for Alamo, Jose and Rodriguez, Maria V.
No full textMarriage license for Maria V. Rodriguez and Jose Alamo. C.E. Harrison was the officiant
Uktena Fend, Rodriguez & Lenat, 2015, n. gen.
No full textUktena n. gen. Included species: Uktena riparia n. sp. (type species by monotypy) Diagnosis (autapomorphies are underlined). Medium-sized to large worms with long, superficially-ringed proboscis. Chaetae simple-pointed. Reproductively-mature worms have several modified chaetae in ventral chaetal bundles of two postatrial segments. Two pairs of lateral blood vessels in posterior segments, with many blind branches. Nephridia begin on 10 / 11. One pair of testes in VIII, one pair of ovaries in IX. Male pores paired on VIII, in deep copulatory bursae with associated glands. Prosoporous atria elongate-cylindrical, ampulla covered with clusters of prostatic cells; ectal ducts produce tubular spermatophores. One pair of sperm funnels, extending back one or more segments in sperm sac. Vasa deferentia do not penetrate posterior septum (8 / 9). Female pores on posterior septum of first post-atrial segment. Spermathecae paired in atrial segment, anterior to atria; spermathecal pores within deep bursae containing a glandular, protrusible, copulatory organ for spermatophore attachment. Remarks. Uktena n. gen. has three distinctive autapomorphies, all of which were previously unknown in the family Lumbriculidae: a unique arrangement of genital chaetae, a “copulatory organ” within a large, muscular spermathecal bursa, and tubular spermatophores (see Discussion). The presence of spermathecae in the atrial segment is unusual within the family, but this character is shared with at least three other lumbriculid genera, as well as two species of Dorydrilus Piguet, 1913 (see Discussion). The combination of a prosoporous atrium and spermathecae in the male segment suggests that Uktena is closely related to Kincaidiana Altman, 1936, also a large worm with a filiform proboscis. However, Kincaidiana has the male pores in IX (instead of VIII) and has spermathecae also in postatrial segments. Guestphalinus Michaelsen, 1933 and Cookidrilus Rodriguez & Giani, 1987 are differentiated from Uktena and Kincaidiana by their semiprosoporous male ducts, as well as by the position of atria in IX and X, respectively. The three Cookidrilus species are small worms, without a proboscis, and with spermathecae also in post-atrial segments (Rodriguez & Giani 1987, Route et al. 2004, Rodriguez et al. 2014).Published as part of Fend, Steven V., Rodriguez, Pilar & Lenat, David R., 2015, Uktena riparia n. gen., n. sp. (Annelida, Clitellata, Lumbriculidae), a new spermatophore-producing oligochaete, pp. 411-424 in Zootaxa 3994 (3) on pages 412-413, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3994.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/24610
OZ REALTY LLC v. RODRIGUEZ
No full textLL commenced a licensee holdover against Mr. Rodriguez, the occupant, who answered with a succession defense to inherit the rent-stabilized lease of the tenant-of-record mother Ms. Gonzalez who vacated the apt. Mr. Rodriguez moved for summary judgment on the succession defense pursuant to CPLR sec. 3212. LL cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the succession rights defense and granting LL a final judgment of possession against Mr. Rodriguez. Judge Thermos finds two elements of succession defense met : (1) occupant is the son of tenant-of-record, and (2) he is a disabled person. The third element, whether he co-resided with TOR for one year before her vacatur, and TOR\u27s date of vacatur presents issues of fact to be determined at trial. Judge Thermos finds Mr. Rodriguez\u27 family and friends\u27 affidavits self-serving and not dispositive. The family is found to have credibility issues, requiring a trial. Landlord\u27s cross motion is denied
OZ REALTY LLC v. RODRIGUEZ
No full textLL commenced a licensee holdover against Mr. Rodriguez, the occupant, who answered with a succession defense to inherit the rent-stabilized lease of the tenant-of-record mother Ms. Gonzalez who vacated the apt. Mr. Rodriguez moved for summary judgment on the succession defense pursuant to CPLR sec. 3212. LL cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the succession rights defense and granting LL a final judgment of possession against Mr. Rodriguez. Judge Thermos finds two elements of succession defense met : (1) occupant is the son of tenant-of-record, and (2) he is a disabled person. The third element, whether he co-resided with TOR for one year before her vacatur, and TOR\u27s date of vacatur presents issues of fact to be determined at trial. Judge Thermos finds Mr. Rodriguez\u27 family and friends\u27 affidavits self-serving and not dispositive. The family is found to have credibility issues, requiring a trial. Landlord\u27s cross motion is denied
- …
