1,721,044 research outputs found
Replication Data for Norm Entrepreneurship in Foreign Policy: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict
No full textTheories of international norm diffusion rely on accounts of entrepreneurial action - almost exclusively identified as normative non-state actors who persuade powerful states to change their behaviour. We argue that powerful state agents can (also) be moral norm entrepreneurs and explicate the foreign policy acts that make them significant agents of international socialisation. Unlike non-state actors who set the agenda by advocating for new norms, foreign policy leaders leverage their identity and position to advance the recognition and diffusion of already established norms by reframing the moral prerogative of the ‘national interest’. The paper examines a prominent case, namely former British Foreign Secretary William Hague’s promotion, through the offices of the British Foreign Commonwealth, of the international norm prohibiting use of sexual violence in conflict. We ask why and how did the United Kingdom and William Hague devote the attention and resources of the foreign policy apparatus to further this norm established more than a decade earlier in the Rome Statute of the ICC and by gender justice advocates? Crucially, our findings highlight the role of foreign policy leadership in re-framing conflict-related sexual violence as a threat to national and international peace and security, the strategic use of the individual positioning of the foreign minister, the harnessing of the foreign policy machinery to mobilize commitments from other states through networked diplomacy, and seizing international political opportunities to promote the take-up of the norm
Replication Data for Norm Entrepreneurship in Foreign Policy: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict
No full textTheories of international norm diffusion rely on accounts of entrepreneurial action - almost exclusively identified as normative non-state actors who persuade powerful states to change their behaviour. We argue that powerful state agents can (also) be moral norm entrepreneurs and explicate the foreign policy acts that make them significant agents of international socialisation. Unlike non-state actors who set the agenda by advocating for new norms, foreign policy leaders leverage their identity and position to advance the recognition and diffusion of already established norms by reframing the moral prerogative of the ‘national interest’. The paper examines a prominent case, namely former British Foreign Secretary William Hague’s promotion, through the offices of the British Foreign Commonwealth, of the international norm prohibiting use of sexual violence in conflict. We ask why and how did the United Kingdom and William Hague devote the attention and resources of the foreign policy apparatus to further this norm established more than a decade earlier in the Rome Statute of the ICC and by gender justice advocates? Crucially, our findings highlight the role of foreign policy leadership in re-framing conflict-related sexual violence as a threat to national and international peace and security, the strategic use of the individual positioning of the foreign minister, the harnessing of the foreign policy machinery to mobilize commitments from other states through networked diplomacy, and seizing international political opportunities to promote the take-up of the norm
Power
No full textPower is a critical concept in IR and central to all feminist work, including feminist approaches to foreign policy. Unpacking the discourse and practice of foreign policy, feminists demonstrate how foreign policy is deeply gendered. Yet, feminist IR and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA)rarely engage in conversation. While both mainstream and critical FPA conceptualise power differently, gender remains a blind spot. If feminists understand power differently, the question arises whether feminist foreign policies also rest on alternative understandings of, and approaches to, power. This chapter investigates how ‘power’ is “put into discourse” in feminist foreign policy documents. It asks what conceptualisations of power (and what feminisms) are articulated and with what effects. Despite the mutability of the concept, power and especially empowerment is predominantly re-rooted through a neoliberal economic logic, eclipsing other, potentially more transformative variants, thus offering little hope of bringing into being a more liveable, just, and peaceful world.<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"/
- …
