1,721,011 research outputs found
LA VALUTAZIONE DELLE COPPIE CANDIDATE ALL'ADOZIONE: IL PUNTO DI VISTA DI OPERATORI E COPPIE DI GENITORI
The evaluation of candidates-couples for adoption: the social workers and parent’s point of view.
This work aims to identify some indicators of good parenting which are shared by social workers (psychologists and social workers) and couples of candidates for adoption or who have just adopted a child. The objective of this experience has been, first, to give operators and couples an opportunity to take into account the components of parenting considered most important for “success” of an adoption. At the same time, that experi-ence intended to identify evaluation criteria “shared” between the “social actors” in-volved in the path adopted; those criteria could be used for the evaluation of candidates-couples for adoption, and/or monitoring of the parenting skills of couples who have al-ready embarked on that path
Antioxidant protection and cell response to oxidative stress in sibling of IDDM probands
Significant bacteriuria in outpatient diabetic and non-diabetic persons
AIMS:
The prevalence of significant bacteriuria (SB) in diabetes mellitus has not been clearly established. Having previously investigated SB frequency in inpatient diabetic women, we now screened for SB (both asymptomatic and symptomatic forms) in outpatients.
METHODS:
We examined 511 consecutive outpatients with Type 1 (T1D) or Type 2 diabetes (T2D), and 98 non-diabetic subjects. At least one uncontaminated midstream urine sample was available from 602 subjects: 64 T1D (37 female, age 49 +/- 13 years, diabetes duration 23 +/- 15 years), 441 T2D (212 female, 66 +/- 10 years, 12 +/- 10 years), and 97 healthy control subjects (39 female, 57 +/- 12 years). On the same day, we determined: blood cell count, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), plasma creatinine, urinary creatinine, and urinary albumin excretion (UAE; microg/mg urinary creatinine).
RESULTS:
The rate of SB was 14.1% in T1D, 9.3% in T2D and 6.2% in control subjects (P = NS). The 50 diabetic patients with SB differed from the 455 diabetic patients without SB in gender (43 male vs. 206 female, P < 0.001), FPG (10.2 +/- 3.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 2.9 mmol/l, P < 0.05), HbA(1c) (7.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.3%, P < 0.05), and UAE (median 15.6 vs. 7.6 microg/mg, P < 0.01). Eleven diabetic patients with SB had symptoms (vs. 48 without SB, P < 0.05); UAE levels were higher in the 39 asymptomatic diabetic patients with SB than in the 11 symptomatic patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
The prevalence of SB is similar in outpatient diabetic individuals and in non-diabetic subjects. The main risk factors for SB in diabetic patients were female gender and UAE. The likelihood of asymptomatic SB increased with UAE levels, i.e. with the presence of established microangiopathy. Poor glycaemic control is associated with bacteriuria, either as a cause or consequence of bacteriuria
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
