1,720,955 research outputs found
Influence of Various Edge-Bonding Techniques on Gluing Quality of Edge-Bands
No full textOblaganje rubova ključna je stavka koja utječe na kvalitetu
pločastog namještaja. Cilj istraživanja je utvrditi kako različite
tehnike oblaganja troslojnih iverica i uporaba određenih
adheziva utječu na čvrstoću spoja rubne trake i iverice, te
optimalnu metodu ispitivanja. Ispitivanje je provedeno na
troslojnoj iverici debljine 18 mm, oplemenjenoj melaminskom
folijom i obloženoj ABS trakom debljine 1 mm. Testirane su
izvlačna i smična čvrstoća spojeva. Rezultati su pokazali
značajnu razliku između EVA ljepila i HMPUR ljepila. HMPUR
ljepilo pokazalo je višu čvrstoću i otpornost na naprezanja,
čime se pokazalo kao bolji izbor za spojeve visoke trajnosti.
EVA ljepilo pokazalo je niže čvrstoće, vidljivo kroz pojavu
mrežice i slabiju penetraciju zbog različite tehnike nanošenja u
odnosu na HMPUR. Odabir stroja uvelike utječe na kvalitetu
lijepljenja, stoga su potrebna daljnja istraživanjaEdge banding is a crucial factor affecting the quality of panel
furniture. The aim of the research is to determine how different
edge banding techniques for three-layer particleboard and the
use of specific adhesives influence the bond strength between
the edge band and particleboard, as well as to identify the
optimal testing method. The tests were conducted on 18 mm
thick three-layer particleboard, laminated with melamine film and
edged with 1 mm thick ABS tape. The pull-off and shear strength
of the joints were tested. The results showed a significant
difference between EVA adhesive and HMPUR adhesive.
HMPUR adhesive demonstrated higher strength and resistance
to stress, proving to be the better choice for high-durability joints.
EVA adhesive exhibited lower strength, indicated by the
appearance of a mesh pattern and weaker penetration due to
the different application technique compared to HMPUR. The
choice of machinery greatly affects bonding quality, highlighting
the need for further research
Influence of Various Edge-Bonding Techniques on Gluing Quality of Edge-Bands
No full textOblaganje rubova ključna je stavka koja utječe na kvalitetu
pločastog namještaja. Cilj istraživanja je utvrditi kako različite
tehnike oblaganja troslojnih iverica i uporaba određenih
adheziva utječu na čvrstoću spoja rubne trake i iverice, te
optimalnu metodu ispitivanja. Ispitivanje je provedeno na
troslojnoj iverici debljine 18 mm, oplemenjenoj melaminskom
folijom i obloženoj ABS trakom debljine 1 mm. Testirane su
izvlačna i smična čvrstoća spojeva. Rezultati su pokazali
značajnu razliku između EVA ljepila i HMPUR ljepila. HMPUR
ljepilo pokazalo je višu čvrstoću i otpornost na naprezanja,
čime se pokazalo kao bolji izbor za spojeve visoke trajnosti.
EVA ljepilo pokazalo je niže čvrstoće, vidljivo kroz pojavu
mrežice i slabiju penetraciju zbog različite tehnike nanošenja u
odnosu na HMPUR. Odabir stroja uvelike utječe na kvalitetu
lijepljenja, stoga su potrebna daljnja istraživanjaEdge banding is a crucial factor affecting the quality of panel
furniture. The aim of the research is to determine how different
edge banding techniques for three-layer particleboard and the
use of specific adhesives influence the bond strength between
the edge band and particleboard, as well as to identify the
optimal testing method. The tests were conducted on 18 mm
thick three-layer particleboard, laminated with melamine film and
edged with 1 mm thick ABS tape. The pull-off and shear strength
of the joints were tested. The results showed a significant
difference between EVA adhesive and HMPUR adhesive.
HMPUR adhesive demonstrated higher strength and resistance
to stress, proving to be the better choice for high-durability joints.
EVA adhesive exhibited lower strength, indicated by the
appearance of a mesh pattern and weaker penetration due to
the different application technique compared to HMPUR. The
choice of machinery greatly affects bonding quality, highlighting
the need for further research
Influence of Various Edge-Bonding Techniques on Gluing Quality of Edge-Bands
No full textOblaganje rubova ključna je stavka koja utječe na kvalitetu
pločastog namještaja. Cilj istraživanja je utvrditi kako različite
tehnike oblaganja troslojnih iverica i uporaba određenih
adheziva utječu na čvrstoću spoja rubne trake i iverice, te
optimalnu metodu ispitivanja. Ispitivanje je provedeno na
troslojnoj iverici debljine 18 mm, oplemenjenoj melaminskom
folijom i obloženoj ABS trakom debljine 1 mm. Testirane su
izvlačna i smična čvrstoća spojeva. Rezultati su pokazali
značajnu razliku između EVA ljepila i HMPUR ljepila. HMPUR
ljepilo pokazalo je višu čvrstoću i otpornost na naprezanja,
čime se pokazalo kao bolji izbor za spojeve visoke trajnosti.
EVA ljepilo pokazalo je niže čvrstoće, vidljivo kroz pojavu
mrežice i slabiju penetraciju zbog različite tehnike nanošenja u
odnosu na HMPUR. Odabir stroja uvelike utječe na kvalitetu
lijepljenja, stoga su potrebna daljnja istraživanjaEdge banding is a crucial factor affecting the quality of panel
furniture. The aim of the research is to determine how different
edge banding techniques for three-layer particleboard and the
use of specific adhesives influence the bond strength between
the edge band and particleboard, as well as to identify the
optimal testing method. The tests were conducted on 18 mm
thick three-layer particleboard, laminated with melamine film and
edged with 1 mm thick ABS tape. The pull-off and shear strength
of the joints were tested. The results showed a significant
difference between EVA adhesive and HMPUR adhesive.
HMPUR adhesive demonstrated higher strength and resistance
to stress, proving to be the better choice for high-durability joints.
EVA adhesive exhibited lower strength, indicated by the
appearance of a mesh pattern and weaker penetration due to
the different application technique compared to HMPUR. The
choice of machinery greatly affects bonding quality, highlighting
the need for further research
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
