1,721,143 research outputs found

    On the efficiency of polynomial time approximation schemes

    No full text
    A polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for an optimization problem A is an algorithm that given in input an instance of A and ε > 0 finds a (1 + ε)-approximate solution in time that is polynomial for each fixed ε. Typical running times are nO(1/ε) or 21/εO(1) n. While algorithms of the former kind tend to be impractical, the latter ones are more interesting. In several cases, the development of algorithms of the second type required considerably new, and sometimes harder, techniques. For some interesting problems, only nO(1/ε) approximation schemes are known. Under likely assumptions, we prove that for some problems (including natural ones) there cannot be approximation schemes running in time f(1/ε)nO(1), no matter how fast function f grows. Our result relies on a connection with Parameterized Complexity Theory, and we show that this connection is necessary

    Information spreading in dynamic graphs

    No full text
    We present a general approach to study the flooding time (a measure of how fast information spreads) in dynamic graphs (graphs whose topology changes with time according to a random process). We consider arbitrary ergodic Markovian dynamic graph processes, that is, processes in which the topology of the graph at time t depends only on its topology at time t-1 and which have a unique stationary distribution. The most well studied models of dynamic graphs are all Markovian and ergodic. Under general conditions, we bound the flooding time in terms of the mixing time of the dynamic graph process. We recover, as special cases of our result, bounds on the flooding time for the random trip model and the random path one; previous analysis techniques provided bounds only in restricted settings for such models. Our result also provides the first bound for the random waypoint model whose analysis had been an important open question. The bound is tight for the most realistic ranges of the network parameters

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Weak Random Sources, Hitting Sets, and BPP Simulation

    No full text
    We show how to simulate any BPP algorithm in polynomial time by using a weak random source of r bits and min-entropy rγr^{\gamma} for any γ>0\gamma >0. This follows from a more general result about sampling with weak random sources. Our result matches an information-theoretic lower bound and solves a question that has been open for some years. The previous best results were a polynomial time simulation of RP [M. Saks, A. Srinivasan, and S. Zhou, Proc. 27th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1995, pp. 479--488] and a quasi-polynomial time simulation of BPP [A. Ta-Shma, Proc. 28th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1996, pp. 276--285]. Departing significantly from previous related works, we do not use extractors; instead, we use the OR-disperser of Saks, Srinivasan, and Zhou in combination with a tricky use of hitting sets borrowed fro

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore