1,720,983 research outputs found
Comparison Between Resident and Attending Surgeons as Assistants on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Differences in Outcomes, Complications Rate, or Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine if the level of training of the first assistant (resident or attending surgeon) has an influence on the radiographic outcome of AIS surgery and on the accuracy rate of the pedicle screws placement. Summary of Background Data: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is a challenging procedure that requires a dedicated team of skilled professionals. Therefore, understanding the learning curve is of outstanding importance to guarantee the best outcomes and the highest safety to the patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgery for AIS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. All patients were operated by an experienced spine surgeon, assisted by and attending surgeon (group A) or a senior resident (group B). Radiographic outcomes were assessed. Through postoperative CT scan, accuracy of pedicle screw placement was measured (using Gertzbein-Robbins classification). Groups were then statistically compared. Results: A total of 120 patients were included (mean age 15.3±3.39 y, major curve Cobb 60.7±11.9 degrees). No difference was found between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative radiographic (correction rate, thoracic kyphosis, screw density) outcomes or complications. Operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in Group B (P=0.045 and P=0.024, respectively). Of the 2746 pedicle screws inserted (1319 group A and 1427 group B), 2452 had a perfect intrapedicular trajectory (absolute accuracy of 89.29%) and 2697 had a breach <2 mm (relative accuracy of 97.56%). No difference was found among groups in terms of absolute or relative accuracy (P=0.06 and P=0.23, respectively). Conclusions: AIS cases assisted by senior residents have longer operative time and higher blood loss, but this does not negatively affect the overall radiographic outcome and does not place the patient at increased risk of complications. Level of Evidence: III
Restoration of Spinopelvic Alignment After Reduction of High-grade Spondylolisthesis: Myth or Reality? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Objective: The aim of the presented study is to assess whether the reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) through the correction of lumbosacral kyphosis leads to a decrease in the sagittal spinopelvic compensatory mechanisms. Summary of Background Data: HGS is as an anterior translation of a vertebra, >50%. It is also characterized by a kyphotic deformity of the affected level. This combination of translation and kyphosis leads to compensatory mechanisms on the sagittal plane [pelvic retroversion, increased lumbar lordosis (LL), reduction in thoracic kyphosis (TK)]. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of HGS (Meyerding >II, Slip% >50%), partial or complete reduction surgery (with a significant decrease in Slip%), and report of spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, or sacral slope). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were extracted and summarized. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate the differences between preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment measures. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Eighteen studies were included. PT showed a statistically significant decrease of -2.1217 (95% CI: -3.4803 to -0.7630), while SS showed a significant increase of 4.8349 (95% CI: 2.7462-6.9236). Conversely, both LL and TK showed nonsignificant changes, -4.7043 (95% CI: -10.4535 to 1.0449) and 6.3881 (95% CI: -0.8344 to 13.6106), respectively. VAS significantly decreased by -3.1950 (95% CI: -4.9462 to -1.4439). Conclusions: The meta-analysis showed mild, yet statistically significant, decrease of PT and an increase in SS after HGS reduction. Conversely, nonstatically significant decrease in LL and an increase in TK occurred. The clinical significance of these results remains questionable. Level of Evidence: Level IV
Can postoperative changes in pelvic incidence occur after adult spine deformity surgery? When do they occur, and what factors influence them? A systematic review with pooled analysis
Objective: Pelvic incidence (PI) is traditionally considered a constant anatomic parameter in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, emerging evidence suggests that PI may change postoperatively, potentially influencing sagittal balance and mechanical complications. This study aims to systematically review the literature on postoperative PI variations in ASD patients, identifying potential radiologic and surgical predictors. Methods: Papers describing postoperative PI changes in ASD patients were included in the analysis. The rate of PI changes, in different subgroups of patients was considered for outcome measure. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the prevalence and factors influencing PI changes. Results: Thirteen studies (1055 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All included studies assessed spinopelvic parameters using standing full-spine X-rays, except for one that used full-body standing X-rays, demonstrating moderate\high reproducibility in PI measurement (ICC: 0.71–0.96). While the mean absolute PI value remained stable postoperatively, 46.3% of patients experienced significant changes (> 5°). Factors associated with PI variations included fusion area, pelvic fixation type, preoperative sagittal imbalance, and extreme PI values. Sacropelvic fixation reduced PI instability, whereas prolonged anterior imbalance and compensatory pelvic retroversion increased the likelihood of PI shifts. Long-term follow-ups indicated that PI changes could not recover or increase in patients without sacropelvic fixation and in patients with higher preoperative PI values if they experience a decrease in PI postoperatively. Conclusion: The current literature challenges the traditional belief that PI is a static parameter in ASD surgery, particularly in severely imbalanced patients or those with extreme PI values. Acknowledging that PI may change under certain preoperative conditions could help optimize postoperative sagittal realignment in selected groups of ASD patients
Pedicle Dysplasia in Proximal Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves: What are We Missing and What are its Possible Surgical Implications? An Observational Retrospective Study on 104 Patients
Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To assess if pedicle dysplasia is present in proximal thoracic (PT), both structural and nonstructural, compared to main thoracic (MT) curves; and to assess if it is predictive of radiographic outcomes at minimum 2 years of follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically-treated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with Lenke 1-2-3-4 curves was performed. On preoperative CT-scan, at the apical vertebra, pedicle width on the concavity (PWc) and on the convexity (PWv) and Pedicle Dysplasia Index (PDI, defined as PWc/PWv) were measured. Preoperative and last follow-up (at least 2 years) x-rays were reviewed. Results: 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into Structural-PT (S-PT) and Nonstructural-PT (NS-PT) groups based on Lenke criteria. PWc (P < .001). And PDI (P < .001 for S-PT, P = .004 for NS-PT) were significantly smaller in the PT than in MT curves for both groups. PT-PWc significantly correlated with follow-up PT Cobb for both groups (P < .001 and P = .015 respectively). PT-PDI significantly correlated with follow-up PT-Cobb (P < .001), CA (P < .040) and T1 tilt (P < .002), only for NS-PT group. NS-PT patients with PWc PT <1 mm had higher RSHD (P = .021) and T1 tilt (P = .025) at follow-up. NS-PT patients with PDI PT <.3 had higher RSHD (P < .001), CA (P = .002) and T1 tilt (P = .003) at follow-up. Conclusion: S-PT and NS-PT curves show significant pedicle dysplasia on the concavity. Pedicle dysplasia significantly correlated with shoulder balance at follow-up, for NS-PT patterns. Patients with a PWc <1 mm or PDI <.30 are at particular risk of postoperative shoulder imbalance
Frailty Influence on Postoperative Surgical Site Infections After Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disease and Adult Spine Deformity. Can a Frailty Index be a Valuable Summary Risk Indicator? A Systematic Review and Metanalysis of the Current Literature
Study design: Metanalysis. Objective: Surgical site infections (SSI) is one of the commonest postoperative adverse events after spine surgery. Frailty has been described as a valuable summary risk indicator for SSI in spine surgery. The aim of this metanalysis is to evaluate the influence of frailty on postoperative SSI in this cohort and provide hints on which index can predict the risk of SSI. Methods: Papers describing the postoperative SSI rate in adult degenerative spine disease or adult spine deformity patients with varying degrees of frailty were included in the analysis. The SSI rate in different grades of frailty was considered for outcome measure. Meta-analysis was performed on studies in whom data regarding patients with different levels of frailty and occurrence of postoperative SSI could be pooled. P < .05 was considered significant. Results: 16 studies were included. The frailty prevalence measured using mFI-11 ranged from 3% to 17.9%, these values were inferior to those measured with mFI-5. Significant difference was found between frail and non-frail patients in postoperative SSI rate at metanalysis (z = 5.9547, P < .0001 for mFI-5 and z = 3.8334, P = .0001 for mFI-11). Conclusion: This is the first meta-analysis to specifically investigate the impact of frailty, on occurrence of SSI. We found a relevant statistical difference between frail and non-frail patients in SSI occurrence rate. This is a relevant finding, as the ageing of population increases alongside with spine surgery procedures, a better understanding of risk factors may advance our ability to treat patients while minimizing the occurrence of SSI
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Comparable rates of lumbar disc degeneration at long-term following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal fusion extended to L3 or L4: systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose: Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires a careful choice of fusion levels. The usual recommendation for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for double major or thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves falls on L3 or L4. The aim of the present study is to assess if the spinal fusion with LIV selection of L3 or L4 in AIS patients has a clinical or radiological impact in terms of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in distal unfused segments at long-term follow-up. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases from eligible articles was conducted. Only studies regarding long-term follow-up of AIS patients treated with spinal fusion were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were extracted and summarized. Meta-analysis on long-term follow-up MRI studies was performed. p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fourteen studies were included, for a total of 1264 patients. Clinical assessment of included patients showed a slight tendency to have worse clinical outcomes if spinal fusion is extended to L4 rather than L3. Despite that, meta-analysis could not be performed on clinical parameters because of heterogeneity of evaluated PROMs in included studies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation at long-term follow-up showed no significant difference in terms of disc degeneration rate at overall meta-analysis (p = 0.916) between patients fused to L3 and L4. Conclusion: The LIV selection of L3 rather than L4, according to current literature, does not prevent disc degeneration in distal unfused segments over the long term. Long-term studies of patients treated with contemporary spinal instrumentation are needed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
