1,721,006 research outputs found
ASO Author Reflections: Recurrence After Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer: Analysis of Risk Factors for this Unexpected Event
No full textASO Author Reflections: Recurrence After Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer: Analysis of Risk Factors for this Unexpected Even
Risk of obstructive sleep apnea among health workers: results of a screening in a large Italian University Hospital
No full textPurposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory sleep disorder, related to increased mortality, poor quality of life, and higher risk of work accidents and injuries. Studies on the risk of OSA (rOSA) among health workers (HW) are scant. The aims of this study were to investigate this issue in a large University Hospital and to assess the effectiveness of a screening program.MethodsThe STOP-BANG questionnaire (SBQ) was sent via e-mail to the 5031 HW employed at the University Hospital of Verona. HW who completed the SBQ were classified at low, moderate, and high rOSA. HW at high rOSA were invited to undergo nocturnal polygraphy. The determinants of rOSA were studied by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson's chi-squared, and multinomial logistic model.ResultsOf 5031 HW, 1564 (31.1%) completed the online questionnaire. Responders with low, moderate, and high rOSA were 72.7%, 13.7%, and 13.6%. Male gender, older age, and higher body mass index (BMI) were significant predictors of high rOSA, as expected. Physicians had the lowest probability of being in the high-risk category. Polygraphy was performed in 64 subjects. The positive predictive value of the self-administered SBQ was 68.8% (95%C.I. 55.9-79.8%) but raised to 96.9% (95%C.I. 89.2-99.6%) when re-administered by medical staff.ConclusionSBQ showed its effectiveness as a screening tool in detecting undiagnosed OSA in HW. Systematic screening for OSA in work settings could allow early diagnosis and treatment, reducing short- and long-term health effects of OSA
PhotoNodes Protocol: A Multicenter Prospective Study for the Assessment of Proper Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery Using Intraoperative Photographs
No full textIntroduction: In gastric cancer surgery, an adequate D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with improved cancer-specific survival. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of a new score (PhotoNodes Score [PNS]) conceived to rate the quality of lymphadenectomy in minimally invasive gastrectomy. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the inter-observer agreement among the reviewers assigning the score. The secondary outcome was the association between PNS and survival. Methods: This is a multicentric observational prospective study enrolling patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy. A set of laparoscopic/robotic images will be collected from each patient. Based on each set of images, the quality of lymphadenectomy performed will be rated with the new PNS by three surgeons. Fleiss' Kappa measure of agreement will be used to study the rating agreement among examining surgeons. The PNS score will correlate with disease-free and overall survival. Conclusion: The spread of minimally invasive approaches in oncologic gastric surgery made the collection of intraoperative images easier; for this reason, we believe that PNS could represent a new and efficient tool to assess the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy in clinical practice. The PhotoNodes study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT 06466902
Extension of lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer:Audit at European specialist centres.
Full text linkGastric cancer is still one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and its treatment management differs between Eastern Asia and Western countries. Screening program, early diagnosis, and surgical treatment was primarily established in Japan and was rapidly disseminated to other countries. In other parts of the world, such as the USA and Western Europe, the incidence of gastric cancer has declined, and efforts for screening and early detection have not been an issue of higher priority over the management of other diseases. Thus, gastric cancer in the West is often more advanced and is either inoperable or needs more radical surgery for resection. The only treatment method that can potentially cure gastric cancer is the surgical approach. Depending on the extension of the tumor, surgeons may execute an operation that involves removing all or part of the stomach with some nearby lymph nodes (lymphadenectomy). Lymphadenectomy is a crucial step during surgical operation that involves the removal of one or more lymph nodes located in the drainage area of a tumor, in which there is a high possibility of lymph node metastasis. The Japanese guidelines define the criteria of lymphadenectomy procedure into D1 D1+ or D2 according to the type of gastrectomy executed. The extent of lymphadenectomy has long been a subject of debate. Indeed, Japanese surgeons introduced extended lymphadenectomy (D2), which has also been progressively adopted in Europe and included in almost all international guidelines. However, the procedure requires a long learning curve, which involves a high volume of interventions; therefore, US guidelines do not recommend the D2, and many Italian and European centres do not yet perform this procedure. Indeed, the current European Consensus guidelines recommend D2 dissection in regional specialist centres for patients with moderate comorbidity. However, compliance with guidelines is unclear, and in some recent RCTs, the standard approach of surgical treatment is at the "surgeon's discretion." This study aims to evaluate the current practice of D2 lymphadenectomy in Europe to determine any variation in practice and compare it with the Japanese guidelines. The study consists of two parts: first, a questionnaire based on hypothetical clinical scenarios was administered to expert surgeons belonging to European Chapter of the International Gastric Cancer Association from high-volume European centers. They were asked to select the appropriate lymphadenectomy extension for each hypothetical case and the associated lymph node stations to remove. In the second part of the study, the same surgeons were asked to collect their data about gastric cancer gastrectomies performed in 2015 for comparative analysis. The study results show that the expert surgeons of high-volume centres are quite in agreement with the choice of D2 lymphadenectomy in the different clinical scenarios. The surgical choice seems to have been influenced by the tumor stage, site, and histology of the tumor. More specifically, the D2 procedure is recommended for cases with diffuse histology compared to tumors with intestinal histology. However, the selection of the D2 dissection procedure rarely conformed to Japanese guidelines: the choice of lymph node stations revealed the presence of a wide variation in execution. In the review of the gastrectomy experience, it was observed that a high surgical standard was achieved: in fact, in 97% of gastric cancer gastrectomies after D2, an adequate number of lymph nodes (≥15 nodes) were removed. In conclusion, even if an adequate lymphadenectomy was obtained in almost all cases in dedicated centers, there is still significant variability in the number of recovered lymph nodes. The histology of the tumor largely influences the surgeon's choice regarding the extent of the lymphadenectomy; however, the role of histology in the planning of surgical procedures is not considered in the current guidelines and must be verified in prospective studies
Should we still use prophylactic drain in gastrectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textProphylactic drain in gastrectomy for cancer is still widely used, although some evidence has disputed this practice and spreading enhanced recovery protocol has been pushing towards surgical simplification. This study aimed at assessing the impact of drain placement on important clinical outcomes, evaluating the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or cohort studies whenever information provided by the former was scarce. PubMed, PMC, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched from January 1990 to February 2019, both for RCTs and cohort studies comparing use or avoidance of prophylactic drain in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. All RCTs and cohort studies were rated according to Jadad score and Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale, respectively. Meta-analysis was separately performed on RCTs and cohort studies. The following clinical outcomes were considered: anastomotic leak, reoperation rate, additional drain procedure, length of stay, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, readmission rate and drain related complications. Overall, 3 RCTs (330 patients) and 7 cohort studies (2897 patients) were included. Seven studies came from Eastern Countries. Meta-analysis on RCTs evidenced that drain avoidance halves overall morbidity (RR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.26-0.86, p = 0.014) and slightly reduces length of stay (SMD -0.24, 95%CI -0.51-0.03, p = 0.083). Only one postoperative death occurred in the drain group. The other outcomes were either not reported or reported just by one RCT each. Meta-analysis on cohort studies, despite higher statistical power, did not highlight any significant difference. This meta-analysis showed that prophylactic drain avoidance can reduce morbidity and length of stay, while not significantly affecting other major surgical outcomes
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery can Improve Patient Outcomes and Reduce Hospital Cost of Gastrectomy for Cancer in the West: A Propensity-Score-Based Analysis
Full text linkData on ERAS for gastrectomy are scarce, and the majority of the studies come from Eastern countries. Patients in the West are older and suffer from more advanced tumors that impair their clinical condition and often require neoadjuvant treatment. This retrospective study assessed the feasibility and safety of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for gastrectomy in a Western center
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Feasibility and safety of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for upper GI surgery in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) in a high-volume surgical center
No full textEnhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have demonstrated their efficacy after esophagectomy and gastrectomy but little is known about their feasibility and safety in elderly patients. Patients submitted to Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy or gastrectomy for cancer between January 2016 and June 2019 were divided into three age groups: young-age group, YG (<= 65 years, n = 130); middle-age group, MG (66-74 years, n = 101); old-age group, OG (>= 75 years, n = 74). The groups were compared for adherence to our ERP, morbidity and mortality rates. After esophagectomy, adherence to ERP was comparable between the three groups, overall morbidity was higher in OG, without statistically significant difference, while the incidence of cardiac complications was significantly higher in OG (p = 0.02). After gastrectomy, OG presented a lower adherence to urinary catheter removal and to early mobilization. No difference in overall morbidity rate was observed (p = 0.13). The median length of stay was comparable both after esophagectomy (p = 0.075) and gastrectomy (p = 0.07). Multivariable analysis showed that age >= 75 years was not associated with a higher risk of ERP failure either after esophagectomy (p = 0.59) or after gastrectomy (p = 0.83). After esophagectomy, the risk of failure of the ERP program was higher for patients with ASA grade 3-4 (p = 0.03) and for those with postoperative complications (p < 0.001) while after gastrectomy only postoperative complications were associated to higher risk of ERP failure (p < 0.001). In our series, adherence to ERP protocol of patients >= 75 years old was similar to that of younger patients after esophagectomy and gastrectomy, without a significant increase in morbi-mortality rates
- …
