2,118 research outputs found
Ivo Pilar and Progressivism
No full textAutor se u članku bavi ranijim razdobljem Pilarove karijere u namjeri da pokaže kako je njegov životni put višeslojan i ne može se jednostrano ocijeniti kao što je to slučaj u mnogim dosadaπnjim radovima. U početnom dijelu rada osvrnuo se na njegovo obiteljsko okruženje i intelektualno oblikovanje tijekom studija u Beču, kada je pripadao modernistički usmjerenoj mladeži koja se uglavnom
priklonila naprednjačkoj ideologiji. Premda se do odlaska u Bosnu i Hercegovinu samo rubno osvrtao na politička pitanja, očito je da se Pilar u tom razdoblju kritički odnosio prema držanju hrvatske političke elite, držeći da ona zbog svog tradicionalizma ne razumije suvremene probleme društva. U tom smislu odbacivao je i političku doktrinu Stranke prava kao besplodni nacionalizam. Na temelju slabo korištenih i novootkrivenih dokumenata jasno je da je Pilar s
nekim drugim pripadnicima pokreta moderne i tijekom boravka u Sarajevu nastavio promišljati u naprednjačkom duhu. Prekretnicu označavaju duboke promjene na hrvatskoj političkoj sceni, kad se osniva Hrvatska pučka napredna stranka, koja je iz taktičkih razloga vezanih uz suradnju sa srpskim političarima zanemarila raspravu o Bosni i Hercegovini, što je po Pilaru bilo neprihvatljivo jer se time išlo u prilog srpskom nacionalizmu. Na kraju članka uvršteni su
izvorni prilozi.In the paper the author deals with an earlier period of Pilar’s career in
order to show the multifarious character of his life’s journey which cannot be judged from a single perspective as was the case in numerous works to date. In the first part of the paper the author dwells on Pilar’s family life and intellectual evolution in the course of his studies in Vienna, where he joined a group of young people advocating modernism and mostly inclined toward a progressive ideology. Although until his departure for Bosnia and Herzegovina he only marginally dealt with political issues, it is evident that at that time Pilar had a critical view of the Croatian politic elite, convinced that due to its conservatism it did not understand contemporary societal problems. In that sense he discarded the political doctrine of the Party of Right as fruitless nationalism. On the basis of some rarely used and newly discovered documents it has become evident that Pilar, along with some other followers of the Modernist movement, continued to deliberate in the spirit of Progressivism during his stay in Sarajevo. The turning point was marked by the deep changes that took place on Croatia’s political scene with the establishment of the Croatian Popular Progressive Party, which for tactical reasons that were linked to cooperation with Serbian politicians, neglected the discourse on Bosnia and Herzegovina, something that was unacceptable to Pilar because in that way support was given to Serbian nationalism. The concluding part of the article contains original contributions
Ivo Pilar and Robert William Seton-Watson: two Political Viewpoints on the Southern Slav Question
No full textIn this article, the author compares the viewpoints of Ivo Pilar and
R. W. Seton-Watson, two brilliant publicists, on the South Slav Question as the
key problem in southeast Europe in the period up to 1918. He shows how
before the First World War both sought a solution to this complex problem,
particularly the aspect of Croat-Serb relations, exclusively within the framework
of the Habsburg Monarchy. The difference between them lay in the fact that
Pilar sought to affirm Croatian statehood, while Seton-Watson to create a new
Yugoslav statehood. During the war, Seton-Watson held the view that it was
necessary to establish an independent Yugoslav state outside the Monarchy in
order to solve the Yugoslav question, but Pilar cemented his standpoint that the
Monarchy was the only possible solution for Croatian interests
Dr. Ivo Pilar — A Lawyer in Tuzla (1905-1920)
No full textNa temelju arhivskoga gradiva kotarskog suda u Tuzli i dostupne literature,
autor opisuje i analizira Pilarovu odvjetničku djelatnost u Tuzli. Svega par
godina nakon otvaranja ureda u Tuzli (1905.) Pilar je uspio organizirati najveći
odvjetnički ured u tom gradu, koji se u prvom redu bavi građanskim i
trgovačkim pravom. Dostupni podatci pokazuju da od sredine Prvoga svjetskog
rata dolazi po postupnog smanjenja djelatnosti njegova ureda, što ukazuje na to,
da Pilara sve intenzivnije zaokuplja druga problematika. Također se pokazuje da
je njegov ured u Tuzli konačno utrnuo tek 1921., nekoliko mjeseci nakon
njegova preseljenja u Zagreb.The author analyses the law practice of Dr. Ivo Pilar in Tuzla (1905-1920)
and bases his analysis upon accessible archive material, contemporary
journalism and published materials. The archive material reveals that —
according to the number of documents as well as the number, i. e. the
structure of Pilar's collaborators — Pilar's law office was the most
developed in Tuzla after only several years. In Tuzla Pilar practised law
until 1920, but certain documents show that even in the first half of 1921
his office was not entirely closed. During those fifteen years, Pilar
predominantly dealt with civil and commercial law, representing numerous
physical and legal persons from both Tuzla and its surrounding area as well
as from other parts of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. While doing so, he
also earned considerable income. Owing to that income and numeous
collaborators, Pilar could devote significant time to his intellectual work,
and, in part, to the direct participation in the political struggle. Since the
middle of World War I a standstill — even a decrease in the intensity of his
law practice — could be noticed. This could be partly ascribed to the war,
while, in part, it must have been due to his intensive work on treatises and
books that represent the central part of his oeuvre. For Pilar, the demise of
the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy and the establishment of the Kingdom of
Serbs, Croats and Slovenes meant the breakdown of his political plans and
visions. He was severely stricken by those events also in terms of his
profession. Having become most disliked by the regime, Pilar lost the best
part of his property and feared for his own life. Thus, during 1920 he made
preparations for moving his office to Zagreb
El sagrat i el profà. Rituals creatius de la matèria
No full textArtistas-Investigadors: Grupo Materia: Amparo Alepuz, Juan Fco. Martínez Gómez Albacete, Imma Mengual, Lourdes Santamaría, ELia Torrecilla, Pilar Viviente y Mª José Zanó
Las herencias emocionales en el proceso de madurez de Pilar en Soñar en cubano, de Cristina García
No full textThis paper aims to analyze Dreaming in Cuban as a coming of age text, in which the maturing process is determined by self-awareness as well as the accumulation of emotional capital. Using a theoretical framework of affects and emotions, the author identifies the emotional
legacies received by the main character to show this contradiction is transformed into emotional capital. It is shown how this transformation is possible by choosing empathy as the pivotal point of the emotional structure, and how it is through the social value given to empathy in this historic moment, that the protagonist can mature, while restoring family ties.Este artículo analiza el proceso de madurez de la protagonista de Soñar en cubano desde la perspectiva de la teoría de los afectos. Asume la madurez como un proceso de autorreconocimiento de la experiencia emocional y acumulación de capital emocional. Para este ejercicio resulta fundamental identificar cómo opera la confusión que le genera a la joven recibir una herencia emocional llena de contradicciones y cómo es capaz de transformar la tensión en capital emocional. Con este propósito, se señalan los vínculos entre procesos de madurez, emociones y herencias emocionales que recibe la joven. Por último, se señala la elección de la empatía como centro de su estructura emocional que posibilita la solución de su confusión a través de la reconstrucción del tejido familiar, y resulta ser una decisión históricamente pertinente
The Political Activities of Dr. Ivo Pilar on the Eve of the Demise of the Habsburg Monarchy (1915-1918)
No full textOn the basis of scholarly literature, archival materials and available newspapers
from the period, the author reconstructs the political activities of Dr. Ivo Pilar
during the final years of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy’s existence. Pilar
thought the “South Slav Question” should be solved in “Croatian terms,” that is
to say the unification of all Croatian lands — Croatia, Slavonia, Dalmatia and
Bosnia and Hercegovina — in one independent administrative area contained
within the existing dualistic system. Even though he formally remained within
the framework of dualism, he was, in fact, advocating a solution which in its
main outlines was a form of “veiled trialism.” The Hungarian politicians’ rejection
of a solution of the “South Slav Question” in “Croatian terms,” that is, their
attempt to attach Bosnia and Hercegovina to the Hungarian part of the
Monarchy as a “corpus separatum”, caused additional dissatisfaction and deepened
the already serious crisis into which the Monarchy had fallen. Recognizing
that one of the consequences of the World War was going to be the irreversible
disappearance of the time-honoured Habsburg state from the Central European
political stage, Pilar radicalized his position in terms of its internal reform,
proposing that it be transformed — into a federation
Correction to: Shifting thermal tolerance windows throughout incubation affects sea turtle hatching success: implications for hatchery management and conservation
No full textThe article “Shifting thermal tolerance windows throughout incubation affects sea turtle hatching success: implications for hatchery management and conservation”, written by Matthew L. Rutledge, Frank V. Paladino, James R. Spotila and Pilar Santidrián Tomillo was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 13th March 2024 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed to © The Author(s) 2024 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright. The original article has been corrected.Peer reviewe
Ivo Pilar and R. W. Seton-Watson. Two Views on the Southern-Slavic Question
No full textAutor u članku uspoređuje gledišta Ive Pilara i R. W. Seton-Watsona, dvojice
briljatnih publicista, o južnoslavenskom pitanju kao ključnom problemu
jugoistoka Europe u razdoblju do 1918. godine. Pokazuje kako su do Prvoga
svjetskog rata obojica tražila rješenje toga kompleksnog pitanja, napose
segmenta hrvatsko-srpskih odnosa, isključivo u sklopu Habsburške Monarhije.
Razlika je ležala u činjenici da je Pilar tražio afirmaciju hrvatske državnosti, a
Seton-Watson stvaranje nove južnoslavenske državnosti. Tijekom rata Seton-
-Watson zauzima gledišta da je nužno stvoriti samostalnu južnoslavensku državu
izvan Monarhije da bi se riješilo južnoslavensko pitanje, a Pilar cementira
stajalište da je Monarhija jedino ispravno rješenje za nacionalne interese Hrvata.The author of this paper compares the views of Ivo Pilar and Robert
William Seton-Watson, two brilliant publicists, on the Southern-Slavic
question as the key problem of the organisation of Southeast Europe in the
period between the end of the 19th century and 1918. Pilar represents the
views of a distinguished Croatian intellectual, who seeks answers that
would meet the interests of his own people, while Seton-Watson mirrors a
reputable liberal from a great nation dealing with the fates of smaller
nations. The author shows that up to World War I both men sought a
solution to the problem — particularly to the issues of the Croatian-Serbian
relations — exclusively within the framework of the Habsburg Monarchy.
Both men advocated a change in the internal organisation of the Austro-
Hungarian Empire on the basis of greater national rights. Both men also
held that the Monarchy was indispensable for the preservation of stability
and international peace in Europe, particularly within the context of the
relations between Germany and Russia. In Pilar’s view it was important to
satisfy the principle of uniting the Croatian states into a single
administrative unit and then preserve the unit within the Monarchy, which
would serve as principal protection from all external pretensions, i.e. from
the Italian and Serbian expansions. Seton-Watson maintained that the
trialistic formula would help overcome the conflicts between the Croatian
and Serbian nationalisms. Moreover, owing to its civilisational advantage,
the trialism in question would exert attractive power over the Kingdom of
Serbia and the other parts of the Balkans. Besides, this triadism would
strengthen the Monarchy and make it become more independent from its
alliance with Germany. In Seton-Watson it is obvious that he started
changing his views after the annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in
1908, when he gradually realised that a conflict between German and
British interests in Southeast Europe was inevitable, i.e. that the Austro-
Hungarian Empire could no longer be a British ally since it was, in actual
fact, an appendage of the German Empire. During World War I Seton-
Watson took the opinion that, in order to solve the Southern-Slavic
problem and establish wider international relations, it was essential to
constitute an independent Yugoslavian state outside the Monarchy within
“New Europe”, while Pilar cemented his view that the Monarchy was the
only right solution for the interests of Croatians, emphasising that
attempting to integrate Croatians and Serbians on the ruins of Austro-
Hungary was unnatural and contrary to historical arguments
AN OVERVIEW OF MAJOR SOURCES OF DATA AND ANALYSES RELATING TO PHYSICAL FUNDAMENTALS IN INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY MARKETS
No full textThe debate on whether price movements in commodity markets are determined by changes in physical supply and demand fundamentals or by the speculative effects of financial investors seems to find some element of agreement on one particular point: the need for increased transparency and improved information on futures markets and physical commodity markets. This discussion paper provides an assessment of the current situation with regard to availability of information on physical commodity markets, pointing to some of the existing information gaps and areas for improvement. The paper presents a comprehensive account of the different information sources for physical commodity markets (including their websites), and could therefore be considered a practical information tool in itself, of use to different stakeholders interested in knowing about developments in these markets.
The Life and Work of Ivo Pilar (1874-1933) - An Outline
No full textKonstatirajući uvodno da je u nas uočljiv manjak biografskih djela a posebice
onih o istaknutim ličnostima koje su djelovale od kraja XIX. do polovice XX.
stoljeća, autor to većim dijelom pripisuje okolnostima vladajuće "lsocijalističke
paradigme" nakon Drugoga svjetskog rata, oprimjerujući to i na "slučaju" I.
Pilara. U članku se daje sažet pregled njegova životnog puta (obitelj, školovanje,
mladenački dani, profesionalni život pravnika/odvjetnika, politički angažman i
sudjelovanje u javnom/kulturnom, šire-društvenom životu) prije i nakon g. 1918.
i ističe raznovrsnost njegovih stručnih i znanstvenih interesa, koji se ogledaju i u
tematici spisa jednoga među prvim teoretičarima hrvatske modernizacije.Ivo Pilar (Zagreb, 1874-1933) belongs to a larger group of distinguished
people of Croatia’s public life who worked near the end of the 19th and
during the first half of the 20th century, and yet no reliable biographies of
the same are available. According to the author, one of the underlying
reasons for this is to be found in the disinclination of the “socialist rule”
after 1945 to facilitate (i.e. permit) any objective research of the corpus of
Croatian civil politics of the period in question, warning of the fact that no
serious study of “contemporary history” (in the German science of history:‘Zeitgeschichte’) in Croatia — with due exceptions — had been conducted
before the 1970s; in fact, freedom of approach and research was achievable
only after 1990, when the imposed “embargo” on the life and work of Ivo
Pilar was lifted. Extensive research of Pilar’s work and activities began as
late as 2000 (the results of which are being published in Godiπnjak PILAR /
PILAR Yearbook, 1/2001 and 2/2002, by the Ivo Pilar Institute of Social
Sciences, Zagreb). The author highlights that, regarding a whole series of
unresearched questions, we have not yet (seriously) started. Nevertheless,
one can state, with certainty, that Pilar is one of the most intriguing
phenomena of Croatia’s public life of the time. He was a lawyer and
sociologist by profession (he studied in Vienna and Paris), and he gained
the attribute of a “theoretician of modernisation” as early as 1898 with his
work Secesija / Secession (although the field of his research here is fine art,
his discourse has much wider social implications). He worked in judicature
and banking, and had a reputable law practice from 1905 until he died
(first in Tuzla until 1920 and then in Zagreb). He was a noted political
publicist with two important works published (under pseudonyms) in the
original, i.e. in the German language (Südslawische Frage und der
Weltkrieg / The Southern-Slavic Question and the World War, Vienna 1918,
and Immer wieder Serbien / Always and Only Serbia, Berlin 1933). There
was considerable interest in the Southern-Slavic question in the world even
after World War I (one of the people who was presented with a copy by
the author himself was the then American president Harding).
Professionally and scientifically, Pilar was interested in several different
disciplines: law, geopolitics, sociology, psychology, anthropology, literary
theoretical questions and history (from medieval to contemporary). He was
politically active between 1906 and 1918 not only in Bosnia and
Herzegovina (where he lived and worked for 20 years) but also in the
entire Habsburg Monarchy, attempting in vain to get the country’s ruling
elites to implement administrative, legal and political reforms, firmly
believing that these reforms were the only possible way to preserve this
Central-European union of nations. He was opposed, on principle, to the
constitution of a common Southern-Slavic state, having rightly cautioned of
the Great Serbian hegemony. Thus, from 1918 he was under the watchful
eye of the authorities — so disinclined to him ‡ of the Kingdom of Serbs,
Croats and Slovenes/Yugoslavia. He then became widely socially active,
although remained politically active too “behind the curtain”, having
established contacts from the time of the murder of Stjepan Radić in the
parliament building in Belgrade with some of the most distinguished
Croatian politicians (Ante Trumbić, Vladko Maček et al.). He died in Zagreb
under mysterious circumstances that remain unresolved to date (suicide?
political murder?)
- …
