324,200 research outputs found
Toru Terada' s view of Shusei Tokuda
No full text本論文で、寺田透(1915-1995)が徳田秋声(1871-1943)をどのように見たかということと、さらに、寺田の文学的な立場とを扱った。徳田の晩年の二作品(と)に、寺田は愛欲の濃さと悶えとを見、徳田を非知識人と規定した。寺田がこの徳田秋声論を発表した頃、彼自身、離婚と再婚とを体験した。寺田自身、生活の同伴者との関係に悩んだ。本論文は、寺田の徳田への共感と、寺田自身の個人的な生活との関係を扱った。さらに、文学作品の受容の問題を見た。In this article the author dealt with what Toru Terada (1915-1995) thought of Shusei Tokuda (1871-1943) and also with Terada's own literary position. Terada made clear in Shusei's later novels ( and )the agony caused by insatiable lust and also thought that Shusei was a non-intellectual. When he published his article on Shusei Tokuda, Terada himself got divorced and also got remarried -- he himself worried about a relationship with his partner. This article showed a relationship between Terada's sympathy for Shusei Tokuda and his own personal life. Moreover, it dealt with how a literary work was understood by its readers.論文(Article)departmental bulletin pape
A taxonomic revision and molecular phylogeny of the eastern Palearctic species of the genera Schizomyia Kieffer and Asteralobia Kovalev (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Asphondyliini), with descriptions of five new species of Schizomyia from Japan
No full textThe genus Asteralobia (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Asphondyliini, Schizomyiina) was erected by Kovalev (1964) based on the presence of constrictions on the cylindrical male flagellomeres. In the present study, we examine the morphological features of Asteralobia and Schizomyia and found that the male flagellomeres are constricted also in Schizomyia galiorum, the type species of Schizomyia. Because no further characters clearly separating Asteralobia from Schizomyia were observed, we synonymize Asteralobia under Schizomyia. Molecular phylogenetic analysis strongly supports our taxonomic treatment. We describe five new species of Schizomyia from Japan, S. achyranthesae Elsayed & Tokuda, sp. n., S. diplocyclosae Elsayed & Tokuda, sp. n., S. castanopsisae Elsayed & Tokuda, sp. n., S. usubai Elsayed & Tokuda, sp. n., and S. paederiae Elsayed & Tokuda, sp. n., and redescribe three species, S. galiorum Kieffer, S. patriniae Shinji, and S. asteris Kovalev. A taxonomic key to the Japanese Schizomyia species is provided
Erratum to: Is Sensory Loss an Understudied Risk Factor for Frailty? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
No full textIn the article “Is Sensory Loss an Understudied Risk Factor for Frailty? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” an author was missing. Ana Maseda should be listed as the 11th author. The correct author list is: Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Ryan Eyn Kidd Man, Alfred Tau Liang Gan, Eva K Fenwick, Varshini Varadaraj, Bonnielin K Swenor, Preeti Gupta, Tien Yin Wong, Caterina Trevisan, Laura Lorenzo-López, Ana Maseda, José Carlos Millán-Calenti, Carla Helena Augustin Schwanke, Ann Liljas, Soham Al Snih, Yasuharu Tokuda, Ecosse Luc Lamoureux. This error has been corrected
FIGURE 21 in Description of a new and redescriptions of two known species of Tor ym u s (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) in Taiwan with a key to Taiwanese species
No full textFIGURE 21. Female of Torymus orientalis.Published as part of Matsuo, Kazunori, Yang, Man - Miao, Tung, Gene - Sheng, Tokuda, Makoto & Yukawa, Junichi, 2012, Description of a new and redescriptions of two known species of Tor ym u s (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) in Taiwan with a key to Taiwanese species, pp. 47-57 in Zootaxa 3409 on page 54, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.28188
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Ametrodiplosis stellariae Elsayed, Yukawa & Tokuda 2021, n. sp.
No full textAmetrodiplosis stellariae Elsayed, Yukawa & Tokuda, n. sp. [Figures 8, 9 & 46–62] This species is morphologically similar to A. adetos except for the following characters: Adult. Head (Figs 46–51): Frons with 5–7 setae (n = 5). Internode of male flagellomeres bare, evanescing after flagellomere IX. Mouthparts: labrum with 5–6 short setae (n = 6); labellum with 6–9 strong setae (n = 6). Thorax. Wing (Figs 8, 9) 2.2–2.6 mm long in females (n = 4), 2.0– 2.1 mm long in males (n = 3). Acromere (Fig. 52): empodia nearly as long as claws. Scutellum laterally with 5–9 setae (n = 6). Anepimeron with 5–7 setae (n = 6); anepisternum with 2–4 scales (n = 6). Female abdomen (Figs 53, 54). Tergites I–VI with few lateral setae, few scattered scales on midlength and 1 row of posterior setae; tergite VII with few lateral setae and few scattered on 2 rows of posterior setae. Ovipositor: cerci, about twice longer than wide, with short setae on distal half. Male abdomen (Figs 55–57). Tergites without scales; tergite 7 with 1–2 setae placed posterolaterally. Terminalia: Basal portion of aedeagus extending anteriorly beyond baseline of gonocoxites. Pupa (Figs 58, 59). Antennal bases with pigmented, short, pointed protuberances. Prothoracic spiracle 26 μm long (n = 1), ca. 4.3 times longer than cephalic seta. Terga II–VIII with 3–4 horizontal rows of spine-like spicules on anteromedian third of segment. Larva. Third instar (Figs 60–62). Orange in life. Spatula with pointed lobes. Anus surrounded by median perineal pads covered with pointed and raised cuticular warts. Corniform terminal papillae similar in length; most anterior 2 corniform papillae thinner than others. Etymology. The species name, stellariae, is based on the host genus name. Holotype. 1♂ (ELKU): Reared by R. Sonobe and emerged on 5.viii.2019 from a leaf bud gall on Stellaria uliginosa collected by R. Sonobe in Ryuzu, Nikko, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan on 16.vii.2019. Paratypes. All collected and reared from leaf bud galls on Stellaria uliginosa in Japan; 2 third instar larvae: collected on 16.xi. 2014 in Yakumo village, Matsue City, Shimane Prefecture by T. Nodue. 2♂♂ 5♀♀: same as the holotype. 1 pupa: collected on 14.x.2016 by R. Sonobe at the type locality. 1 pupa & 4♂♂ 1♀: same as the holotype, but collected on 9–15.xi.2016. Distribution. Japan, Honshu: Tochigi, Shiga, Nara, Hiroshima, and Shimane Prefectures. Life history and biological notes. Ametrodiplosis stellariae induces leaf bud galls on Stellaria uliginosa (Fig. 3). Usually one, sometimes two or more larvae develop in each gall. Larva usually pupates in the gall but occasionally in the soil. The number of annual generations has not been clarified. A similar sort of leaf bud gall was found on two congeneric plant species, Stellaria sessiliflora Y. Yabe, in Nara and Tokushima Prefectures, and Stellaria uchiyamana Makino var. apetala (Kitam.) Ohwi in Nara Prefecture. In addition, Cerastium fontanum Baumg. (Caryophyllaceae) also bears similar leaf bud galls in Hokkaido. The host range of A. stellariae requires further study. Remarks. One European species of Ametrodiplosis is presently known from Stellaria L., namely A. duclosii (Tavares) that induces leaf bud galls on S. graminea L. in France and Germany (Tavares 1930; Stelter 1961; Gagné & Jaschhof 2017). Ametrodiplosis stellariae is distinct from A. duclosii as follows: the gonocoxite of A. stellariae are much narrower, its mediobasal lobe are closer to the gonocoxal bases but closer to the distal parts of gonocoxites in A. duclosii (Stelter 1961), and the anterior lobes of the larval spatula are more pointed in A. stellariae (Tavares 1930). Ametrodiplosis stellariae is most similar to A. mamajevi and A. adetos with which they share the curved R 5 distally, narrow gonocoxites and mediobasal lobes placed on the basal half of gonocoxites (Kovalev 1972). Ametrodiplosis stellariae can be distinguished from A. adetos by the less pronounced mediobasal lobe, the basal portion of aedeagus that exceeds anteriorly beyond the base line of gonocoxite, the short-pointed protuberance on pupal antennal bases, the narrow anterior lobes of larval spatula and the more elongate corniform terminal papillae in third instars. Ametrodiplosis stellariae differs from A. mamajevi as follows: the male hypoproct is deeply notched in A. stellariae , but shallowly notched in A. mamajevi; male cerci are truncate in A. stellariae, but lobes of cerci trapezoid in A. mamajevi; male flagellomere XII ends with narrow apical prolongation in A. stellariae but without such prolongation in A. mamajevi.Published as part of Elsayed, Ayman Khamis, Yukawa, Junichi, Mochizuki, Ko, Tokuda, Makoto & Kawakita, Atsushi, 2021, Three new species of Ametrodiplosis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Japan, with a key to the Japanese species and a molecular phylogenetic analysis, pp. 151-172 in Zootaxa 4942 (2) on pages 165-166, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4942.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/460039
Ametrodiplosis aeroradicis Elsayed, Yukawa & Tokuda 2021, n. sp.
No full textAmetrodiplosis aeroradicis Elsayed, Yukawa & Tokuda, n. sp. [Figures 6, 7 & 27–45] This species is morphologically similar to A. adetos except for the following characters: Adult. Head (Figs 27–32). Frons with 5–9 setae (n = 7). Male flagellomeres with bare internode evanescing after flagellomere X but slight constriction remaining in flagellomeres XI–XII (Fig. 30). Mouthparts: labrum with 6–8 short setae (n = 7); labellum with 8–10 strong setae (n = 9). Thorax. Wing (Figs 6, 7) 2.2–2.6 mm long in females (n = 5), 1.8–1.9 mm long in males (n = 3); R 5 slightly curved distally. Scutellum laterally with 5–11 setae (n = 7). Anepimeron with 4–7 setae (n = 8); anepisternum with 2–5 scales (n = 5). Female abdomen (Figs 34, 35). Tergite VII with scales only on posterior third. Sternites VI with 2 rows of posterior setae; sternite VII with 3 rows of posterior setae. Ovipositor: protrusible portion with 2 lateral setae postero-dorsally; cerci ca. 2.6 longer than wide. Male abdomen (Figs 36–38). Tergite VI with few scales, no lateral setae and 1 row of posterior setae. Terminalia: gonostylus with microtrichia from base to before midlength dorsally and from base to midlength ventrally; hypoproct with deep triangular notch. Pupal exuviae (Figs 39, 40). Antennal base with elongate, pigmented, serrate protuberance, nearly as long as cephalic seta. Prothoracic spiracles 26–27 μm long (n = 2), ca. 3.3 times longer than cephalic seta. Terga II–VIII with 3–4 horizontal rows of spine-like spicules on anteromedian third of segment. Larva. Third instar (Figs 41–43). Orange in life. Spatula with pointed lobes. Anus surrounded by median perineal pads covered with pointed and raised cuticular warts. Most anterior pair of corniform terminal papillae thinner than others; median pair wider than others. Larva. Second instar (Figs 44, 45). Light orange in life, body cylindrical. Spatula absent. Integument ventrally with anteromedian field of tiny pointed cuticular warts on anterior half of thoracic segments and abdominal segments I–VIII, dorsally and laterally covered pointed verrucae on anterior two thirds and rounded verrucae on distal third. One group of two setose and one asetose lateral papillae present on each thoracic segment. Ventral papillae invisible. Two sternal papillae on each thoracic segment and four sternal papillae on abdominal segments I– VIII, all without setae. Two pairs of setose pleural papillae present on thoracic and abdominal segments I–VIII. Terminal segment: ventrally with median perineal pads each bearing 1 asetose anal papilla and few rows of pointed cuticular warts surrounding anal opening, 2 posterolateral smooth plaques each bearing 2 asetose anal papillae, surface anterior and lateral to anus covered with tiny, pointed cuticular warts; dorsally covered with pointed verrucae and with 2 long setose papillae and 6 large corniform papillae, most anterior 2 corniform papillae thinner than others, median 2 wider than others, innermost 2 shorter than others. Etymology. The species name, aeroradicis, is based on the two Latin words “aer” for air and “radices” for root to indicate that galls of this species are formed on the aerial roots. Holotype. 1♂ (ELKU): emerged on 23–24.vi.2011 from gall on aerial root on Trachelospermum asiaticum collected by S. Sato on 19.vi. 2011 in Kanou, Kiyotake, Miyazaki City, Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. Paratypes. All from aerial root galls on Trachelospermum spp. in Japan; 4 second instars: collected by K. Ogata on 18.ix.2019 from galls on T. gracilipes var. liukiuense in Tanegashima, Nishinoomote City, Kagoshima Prefecture and dissected on 2.x.2019 by A. K. Elsayed; 1♂: same as the holotype; 2♀♀ & 2 pupal exuviae: collected by S. Sato on 19.vi.2011 from galls on T. asiaticum at the type locality, emerged on 22.vi.2011; The following specimens were reared or obtained from the aerial root galls on T. asiaticum that were collected by H. Ikenaga from Shiroyama, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima Prefecture: 3♀♀ emerged on 22.vi.1977; 1♂, 1♀ on 15.iv.1978; 1♀ on 26.vi.1977; 1♀ on 28.vi.1977; 1♀ & 1 pupal exuviae on 22.vi.1977; 1♂ & 1 pupal exuviae on 29.vi.1977; 1♀ on 26.vi.1977; 1♀ on 29.vi.1977; 2 third instars obtained on 4.iii.1978. In addition, J. Yukawa reared or obtained the following specimens from the root galls on T. asiaticum in Shiroyama: 1♂, reared on 15.iv.1978; 1♀, on 23.iv.1978; 2 third instar larvae obtained on 27.v.1972. Distribution. Widespread in Japan: Honshu (Fukushima, Chiba, Tokyo, The Izu Islands, Shizuoka, and Wakayama Prefectures), Kyushu (Fukuoka, Oita, Miyazaki, and Kagoshima Prefectures), and Okinawa Prefecture. Life history and biological notes. Ametrodiplosis aeroradicis induces irregular, brown, spherical galls of 2.3– 7.0 mm in diameter on the aerial roots of Trachelospermum asiaticum and T. gracilipes var. liukiuense (Apocynaceae) (Fig. 2). The galls are sometimes fused and each harbors one to four larvae in separate chambers. Larvae can be found in the galls in all seasons of the year and pupation takes place in the gall. Remarks. Two species of Ametrodiplosis are known to induce irregular spherical galls on the roots of their host plants: A. recondita Gagné on Pycnanthemum tenuifolium Schard. (Lamiaceae) in North America (Gagné 2018a) and A. auripes (Löw) on Galium mollugo (Rubiaceae) in Europe (Löw 1888). Although the life history and the gall shape of these two species resemble those of A. aeroradicis , they are associated with distant hosts and are very different morphologically (Gagné 2018a; Möhn 1955). Ametrodiplosis aeroradicis is most similar to A. adetos with which it shares mediobasal lobes that are closer to base than to distal part of gonocoxites, narrower gonostylus from base to apex, and aedeagal base not exceeding the gonocoxal base. They can be distinguished easily as follows: male flagellomeres VIII–XII are slightly constricted in A. aeroradicis, but cylindrical in A. adetos; R 5 is less curved distally in A. aeroradicis; mediobasal lobes are less protruding from gonocoxites in A. aeroradicis; pupal antennal bases of A. aeroradicis possess long serrate apical protuberances but tiny, acute apical protuberances in A. adetos; and anterior lobes of larval spatula are pointed and narrower in A. aeroradicis but rounded and wider in A. adetos.Published as part of Elsayed, Ayman Khamis, Yukawa, Junichi, Mochizuki, Ko, Tokuda, Makoto & Kawakita, Atsushi, 2021, Three new species of Ametrodiplosis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Japan, with a key to the Japanese species and a molecular phylogenetic analysis, pp. 151-172 in Zootaxa 4942 (2) on pages 161-165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4942.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/460039
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
