55,972 research outputs found
Kant i Tischner a problem zła. Kilka uwag krytycznych o Tischnerowskiej interpretacji filozofii zła u Immanuela Kanta
No full text Kant and Tischner and the question of evil. Several critical remarks concerning the Tischner’s interpretation of the philosophy of evil in I. Kant’s thoughtIn the paper “Kant, Tischner and the Problem of Evil” the author would like to draw the readers’ attention to the question of evil. It is the matter of fact that the problem of evil has become one of the most discussed in the contemporary philosophy. The role of I. Kant in this field is important, and many thinkers in 20th century considered the evil’s problem in relations to Kant, who coined the term ‘radical evil’. One of them was a Polish philosopher, J. Tischner. In the paper the author takes into consideration the arguments of Tischner about the Kant’s conception and critically discusses them. Kant and Tischner and the question of evil. Several critical remarks concerning the Tischner’s interpretation of the philosophy of evil in I. Kant’s thoughtIn the paper “Kant, Tischner and the Problem of Evil” the author would like to draw the readers’ attention to the question of evil. It is the matter of fact that the problem of evil has become one of the most discussed in the contemporary philosophy. The role of I. Kant in this field is important, and many thinkers in 20th century considered the evil’s problem in relations to Kant, who coined the term ‘radical evil’. One of them was a Polish philosopher, J. Tischner. In the paper the author takes into consideration the arguments of Tischner about the Kant’s conception and critically discusses them
L’approccio agatologico-cristologico al concetto di persona nella riflessione teatrologica-teologica di Hans Urs von Balthasar e di Józef Tischner
No full textIn this article we present the contemporary approach to the theological understanding of the concept of person according to the theodramatical current of thought represented by H. U. von Balthasar and J. Tischner. We describe the basic anthropological (agathological–dialogical) and teological (christological–trinitological) aspects characteristic for the approach of both authors. We pay a particular attention to the original contribution of Balthasar and Tischner in the analyzed problem, especially as far as the application of theatrological terminology to the considerations regarding the theological notion of person is concerned. The axis of the analysis is the comparison of the two key theatrological–theological analogies regarding the notion of person introduced by the above mentioned authors concerning respectively the relation role–mission (Balthasar) and mask–face (Tischner).In quest’articolo, presentiamo l’approccio contemporaneo alla comprensione teologica del concetto di persona, formatosi nella corrente del pensiero teodrammatico, rappresentato da H. U. von Balthasar e da J. Tischner. Descriviamo gli aspetti fondamentali antropologici (agatologici–dialogici) e teologici (cristologici–trinitari) caratteristici degli approcci di entrambi gli autori. Prestiamo attenzione particolare ai contributi originali di Balthasar e di Tischner al problema preso in esame, soprattutto per quanto riguarda l’uso della terminologia teatrologica nelle considerazioni riguardanti la descrizione teologica del concetto di persona. L’asse dell’analisi la costituisce il paragone tra due teatrologiche–teologiche analogie chiave, riguardante la nozione di persona introdotte dagli autori su menzionati e concernente, rispettivamente, il rapporto ruolo-missione (Balthasar) e quello di maschera-volto (Tischner).In quest’articolo, presentiamo l’approccio contemporaneo alla comprensione teologica del concetto di persona, formatosi nella corrente del pensiero teodrammatico, rappresentato da H. U. von Balthasar e da J. Tischner. Descriviamo gli aspetti fondamentali antropologici (agatologici–dialogici) e teologici (cristologici–trinitari) caratteristici degli approcci di entrambi gli autori. Prestiamo attenzione particolare ai contributi originali di Balthasar e di Tischner al problema preso in esame, soprattutto per quanto riguarda l’uso della terminologia teatrologica nelle considerazioni riguardanti la descrizione teologica del concetto di persona. L’asse dell’analisi la costituisce il paragone tra due teatrologiche–teologiche analogie chiave, riguardante la nozione di persona introdotte dagli autori su menzionati e concernente, rispettivamente, il rapporto ruolo-missione (Balthasar) e quello di maschera-volto (Tischner)
The agathological–christological approach to the concept of person in the theatrological-theological thought of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Józef Tischner
No full textIn quest’articolo, presentiamo l’approccio contemporaneo alla comprensione teologica del concetto di persona, formatosi nella corrente del pensiero teodrammatico, rappresentato da H. U. von Balthasar e da J. Tischner. Descriviamo gli aspetti fondamentali antropologici (agatologici–dialogici) e teologici (cristologici– trinitari) caratteristici degli approcci di entrambi gli autori. Prestiamo attenzione particolare ai contributi originali di Balthasar e di Tischner al problema preso in esame, soprattutto per quanto riguarda l’uso della terminologia teatrologica nelle considerazioni riguardanti la descrizione teologica del concetto di persona. L’asse dell’analisi la costituisce il paragone tra due teatrologiche–teologiche analogie chiave, riguardante la nozione di persona introdotte dagli autori su menzionati e concernente, rispettivamente, il rapporto ruolo-missione (Balthasar) e quello di maschera-volto (Tischner).In this article we present the contemporary approach to the theological understanding of the concept of person according to the theodramatical current of thought represented by H. U. von Balthasar and J. Tischner. We describe the basic anthropological (agathological–dialogical) and teological (christological– trinitological) aspects characteristic for the approach of both authors. We pay a particular attention to the original contribution of Balthasar and Tischner in the analyzed problem, especially as far as the application of theatrological terminology to the considerations regarding the theological notion of person is concerned. The axis of the analysis is the comparison of the two key theatrological–theological analogies regarding the notion of person introduced by the above mentioned authors concerning respectively the relation role–mission (Balthasar) and mask–face (Tischner)
Tischner czyta Heideggera – metamorfozy pytania o człowieka
No full textStreszczenieTischner czyta Heideggera – metamorfozy pytania o człowiekaKs. Józef Tischner należy do najwcześniej aktywizujących się polskich translatorów i komentatorów myśli Heideggera. Jego „czytanie Heideggera” przyniosło wieloraki plon, nie tylko w postaci precedensów translacyjnych, ale przede wszystkim jako źródło inspiracji dla własnego myślenia o Bogu i człowieku. W tym przypadku posiłkowanie się myślą Heideggera staje się tym bardziej interesujące, gdy uwzględnimy oczywistą różnicę między charakterem obu projektów: Heidegger kierował swoją uwagę na problematykę bytu, która jego zdaniem za sprawą jej śródziemnomorsko-europejskiej recepcji uległa pojęciowej deformacji, zapomnieniu, zagubieniu; Tischner interesuje się człowiekiem, jako „myślącym według wartości”, ale też trwającym w dialogu – z Bogiem i z innymi ludźmi – i z tego powodu uwikłanym w dramat istnienia. Człowiek u Tischnera bytuje, podobnie jak Heideggerowskie Dasein, ale ludzkie bytowanie jest zaksjologizowane w sposób antropo- i teocentryczny – jest realizowane przez wolny podmiot, będący osobą pośród osób, otwierający się na Boga, podlegający dialogicznemu „zagadnięciu” o charakterze etycznym i odpowiadający na nie swoją egzystencją. W przypadku człowieka powodem jego ukierunkowania na wartości jest nie tylko i nie przede wszystkim ich wymiar „użytkowy”, a jego „rozumienie się” na wartościach przebiega – inaczej niż w przypadku Dasein – nie z powodu trwogi przenikającej jego bycie ku śmierci i nie tylko z uwagi na „zew sumienia”, ale jego otwarcie na transcendencję rozumianą przede wszystkim w sposób etyczny, a nie ontyczny lub ontologiczny.Stawiam sobie zadanie zrekapitulowania tych spośród nawiązań do Heideggera, które zostały przez Tischnera wykorzystane w budowanej przezeń koncepcji człowieka. AbstractTischner reads Heidegger – Metamorphoses of the Question about Man Rev. Józef Tischner was one of the earliest translators and commentators on Heidegger’s thought. His ‘reading of Heidegger’ bore various fruit, not only in the form of translation precedents, but above all, as a source of inspiration for thinking about God and man. In this case, the support of Heidegger’s thought becomes even more interesting if we take into consideration the obvious difference between the natures of both projects: Heidegger focussed on the issue of existence, which – to his mind – was conceptually deformed, forgotten and lost due to its Mediterranean and European reception. Tischner was interested in man as the one who ‘thinks by values’, and at the same time, maintains a dialogue with God and other men, and thus, he is entangled in the tragedy of existence. Tischner’s man exists, just like Heidegger’s Dasein, and yet human existence is axiologized in an athropo- and theocentric manner, i.e., it is performed by a free subject, a person among other persons, open to God, liable to dialogical ‘issue’ that is ethical in its nature, and responding to it with his own existence. In the case of man, the reason behind his orientation for values is not only and not mainly their ‘utilitarian’ dimension. His ‘comprehension’ of values – as opposed to Dasein – progresses not because of the fear that permeates his existence towards death and not only in view of ‘the call of conscience’, but as a result of his openness to transcendence, understood primarily in an ethical manner, and not ontically or ontologically.The task that I set myself is to recapitulate the references to Heidegger which Tischner utilised to construct his concept of man
A Dynamic Subfilter-scale Stress Model for Large Eddy Simulations Based on Physical Flow Scales
No full textWe propose a new definition of the length scale in an eddy-viscosity model for large-eddy simulations (LES). This formulation extends and generalizes a previous proposal [Piomelli, Rouhi and Geurts, Proc. ETMM10, 2014], in which the LES length scale was expressed in terms of the integral length-scale of turbulence determined by the flow characteristics and explicitly decoupled from the simulation grid; this approach was named Integral Length-Scale Approximation (ILSA). As in the original ILSA, the model coefficient was determined by the user, and required to maintain a desired contribution of the unresolved, subfilter scales (SFS) to the global transport. We propose a local formulation (local ILSA) in which the model coefficient is local in space, allowing a precise control over SFS activity as a function of location. This new formulation preserves the properties of the global model; application to channel flow and backward-facing step verifies its features and accuracy
Large-eddy simulation of a separated flow with a sub-filter scale model based on the integral length-scale
No full textA new sub-filter scale model for large-eddy simulations, which uses a length-scale proportional to the integral scale of the turbulence instead of the grid resolution to parametrize the modelled stresses, will be assessed in the prediction of the flow of a boundary-layer over a rough surface, which includes separation and reattachment
Near Wall PIV-Measurements on the Windward Slope of a Hill
No full textThe turbulent flow over periodic hills was measured near to the wall, using planar Particle-Image-Velocimetry (PIV) at high spatial resolution. Our focus is on the near wall turbulence structure on the windward slope of the hill. For large-eddy simulation (LES) we suspect that, if this was not predicted accurately, it affects the prediction of the velocity profiles over the hill crest which in turn will affect the recirculation length downstream of the hill. Regarding the time averaged velocities, we were able to resolve the linear viscous region of the boundary layer. The velocity distribution and also the Reynolds stress does not comply with the law of the wall as it is valid for a turbulent boundary layer at equilibrium
Energy dissipation and flux laws for unsteady turbulence
No full textDirect Numerical Simulations of spatially periodic unsteady turbulence show that the high Reynolds number scalings of the instantaneous energy dissipation rate and interscale energy flux at intermediate wavenumbers are qualitatively different from the well-known cornerstone scalings of equilibrium turbulence where and are time-dependent rms velocity and integral length-scales. Instead, they both scale as where and are length and velocity scales characterizing initial/overall unsteady turbulence conditions
- …
