1,720,969 research outputs found

    Online_Appendix – Supplemental material for Correcting Misperceptions about the MMR Vaccine: Using Psychological Risk Factors to Inform Targeted Communication Strategies

    No full text
    Supplemental material, Online_Appendix for Correcting Misperceptions about the MMR Vaccine: Using Psychological Risk Factors to Inform Targeted Communication Strategies by Kristin Lunz Trujillo, Matthew Motta, Timothy Callaghan and Steven Sylvester in Political Research Quarterly</p

    Autism spectrum disorder, politics, and the generosity of insurance mandates in the United States

    No full text
    The study of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the United States has identified a growing prevalence of the disorder across the country, a high economic burden for necessary treatment, and important gaps in insurance for individuals with autism. Confronting these facts, states have moved quickly in recent years to introduce mandates that insurers provide coverage for autism care. This study analyzes these autism insurance mandates and demonstrates that while states have moved swiftly to introduce them, the generosity of the benefits they mandate insurers provide varies dramatically across states. Furthermore, our research finds that controlling for policy need, interest group activity, economic circumstances, the insurance environment, and other factors, the passage of these mandates and differences in their generosity are driven by the ideology of state residents and politicians–with more generous benefits in states with more liberal citizens and increased Democratic control of state government. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for the study of health policy, politics, and autism in America.</div

    The enactment of autism insurance mandates over time.

    No full text
    The enactment of autism insurance mandates over time.</p

    Replication of Table 3 including all enactments, not just first enactment in states.

    No full text
    Replication of Table 3 including all enactments, not just first enactment in states.</p

    State predictors of passing an autism insurance mandate.

    No full text
    State predictors of passing an autism insurance mandate.</p

    Geographic variation in the generosity of initial ASD insurance mandates, 2000–2017.

    No full text
    Geographic variation in the generosity of initial ASD insurance mandates, 2000–2017.</p

    State predictors of the generosity of autism insurance mandates.

    No full text
    State predictors of the generosity of autism insurance mandates.</p

    The generosity of autism scores across states.

    No full text
    The generosity of autism scores across states.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore