1,720,968 research outputs found
Xylem vessel and Parenchyma cell
No full textThis is an early version of the xylem shown in the "Xylem dysfunction during bacterial disease" figure set. It is meant to be cropped
Ralstonia solanacearum / Bacterial wilt photos and videos
No full textRalstonia solanacearum grown on CPG agar (white colonies) and CPG+TZC agar (red precipitation in colonies). Time lapse videos of exopolysaccharide oozing down a plate after it is turned 90 degree
leaf - generic cartoon
No full textUnfortunately I lost the original .AI. If you need a vector, you might be able to import this into Illustrator & make/expand it
125 ml glass bottle
No full textStandard glass bottle for labware. Modeled after Wheaton 125 ml bottle
Xylem dysfunction during bacterial infection (wilt disease)
No full textPossible forms of vascular dysfunction during bacterial wilt diseases. In SVG/AI format, you can probably delete the bacteria and add wilt fungi if you want
RSSC trees with Bangladesh and Nepal strains - Subedi et al. Supplemental
No full text
Extended version of Fig 2 from Subhedi et al. Phylogeny of South Asian and global Ralstonia. Grey shading indicates Ralstonia isolated from South Asia. Bold indicates genomes sequenced in this study. Purple, red, and light green rectangles identify phylotype I strains isolated from eggplant, pepper, tomato. Phylotype I clades without South Asian strains were collapsed and one representative genome from the clade is listed. </p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
