1,720,983 research outputs found
Three-Phase Confusion Learning
The use of Neural Networks in quantum many-body theory has undergone a formidable rise in recent years. Among the many possible applications, their pattern recognition power can be utilized when dealing with the study of equilibrium phase diagrams. Learning by Confusion has emerged as an interesting and unbiased scheme within this context. This technique involves systematically reassigning labels to the data in various ways, followed by training and testing the Neural Network. While random labeling results in low accuracy, the method reveals a peak in accuracy when the data are correctly and meaningfully partitioned, even if the correct labeling is initially unknown. Here, we propose a generalization of this confusion scheme for systems with more than two phases, for which it was originally proposed. Our construction relies on the use of a slightly different Neural Network: from a binary classifier, we move to a ternary one, which is more suitable to detect systems exhibiting three phases. After introducing this construction, we test it on free and interacting Kitaev chains and on the one-dimensional Extended Hubbard model, consistently achieving results that are compatible with previous works. Our work opens the way to wider use of Learning by Confusion, demonstrating once more the usefulness of Machine Learning to address quantum many-body problems
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Unsupervised and supervised learning of interacting topological phases from single-particle correlation functions
The recent advances in machine learning algorithms have boosted the application of these techniques to the field of condensed matter physics, in order e.g. to classify the phases of matter at equilibrium or to predict the real-time dynamics of a large class of physical models. Typically in these works, a machine learning algorithm is trained and tested on data coming from the same physical model. Here we demonstrate that unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques are able to predict phases of a non-exactly solvable model when trained on data of a solvable model. In particular, we employ a training set made by single-particle correlation functions of a non-interacting quantum wire and by using principal component analysis, k-means clustering, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and convolutional neural networks we reconstruct the phase diagram of an interacting superconductor. We show that both the principal component analysis and the convolutional neural networks trained on the data of the non-interacting model can identify the topological phases of the interacting model. Our findings indicate that non-trivial phases of matter emerging from the presence of interactions can be identified by means of unsupervised and supervised techniques applied to data of non-interacting systems
Bayesian Optimization for QAOA
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) adopts a hybrid quantum-classical approach to find approximate solutions to variational optimization problems. In fact, it relies on a classical subroutine to optimize the parameters of a quantum circuit. In this article, we present a Bayesian optimization procedure to fulfill this optimization task, and we investigate its performance in comparison with other global optimizers. We show that our approach allows for a significant reduction in the number of calls to the quantum circuit, which is typically the most expensive part of the QAOA. We demonstrate that our method works well also in the regime of slow circuit repetition rates and that a few measurements of the quantum ansatz would already suffice to achieve a good estimate of the energy. In addition, we study the performance of our method in the presence of noise at gate level, and we find that for low circuit depths, it is robust against noise. Our results suggest that the method proposed here is a promising framework to leverage the hybrid nature of QAOA on the noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
