1,720,986 research outputs found

    Geomagnetism review 2017

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Our data and research help to develop our scientific understanding of geomagnetic changes in the solid Earth and in the Earth’s atmospheric and space environments, thus helping to develop our understanding of geomagnetic hazards and their impacts. We also provide geomagnetic data, products and services to industry and academia and we use our knowledge to inform the public, government and industry

    Geomagnetism review 2015

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Our data and research help to develop our scientific understanding of geomagnetic changes in the solid Earth and in the Earth’s atmospheric and space environments, thus helping to develop our understanding of geomagnetic hazards and their impacts. We also provide geomagnetic data, products and services to industry and academia and we use our knowledge to inform the public, government and industry

    Geomagnetism Review 2016

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Our data and research help to develop our scientific understanding of geomagnetic changes in the solid Earth and in the Earth’s atmospheric and space environments, thus helping to develop our understanding of geomagnetic hazards and their impacts. We also provide geomagnetic data, products and services to industry and academia and we use our knowledge to inform the public, government and industry

    Geomagnetism Review 2012

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Our data and research help to develop our scientific understanding of geomagnetic changes in the solid Earth and in the Earth’s atmospheric and space environments, thus helping to develop our understanding of geomagnetic hazards and their impacts. We also provide geomagnetic data, products and services to industry and academia and we use our knowledge to inform the public, government and industry

    Geomagnetism : review 2007-2008

    Full text link

    Geomagnetism : review 2010

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s natural magnetic fields, across the world and over time. Our data and expertise help to develop scientific understanding of the evolution of the solid Earth and it’s atmospheric, oceanic and space environments. We also provide geomagnetic products and services to industry and academics and we use our knowledge to inform and educate the public, government and the private sector

    Geomagnetism : review 2011

    Full text link

    Geomagnetism : review 2013

    Full text link
    The Geomagnetism team measures, records, models and interprets variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Our data and research help to develop scientific understanding of the evolution of the solid Earth and its atmospheric, ocean and space environments, and help develop our understanding of the geomagnetic hazard and its impact. We also provide geomagnetic products and services to industry and academics and we use our knowledge to inform the public, government and industry

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore