1,720,969 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Situationsabhängige Interventionen und Peer-Feedback in Massive Open Online Courses
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) open up new opportunities to learn a wide variety of skills online and are thus well suited for individual education, especially where proffcient teachers are not available locally. At the same time, modern society is undergoing a digital transformation, requiring the training of large numbers of current and future employees. Abstract thinking, logical reasoning, and the need to formulate instructions for computers are becoming increasingly relevant. A holistic way to train these skills is to learn how to program. Programming, in addition to being a mental discipline, is also considered a craft, and practical training is required to achieve mastery. In order to effectively convey programming skills in MOOCs, practical exercises are incorporated into the course curriculum to offer students the necessary hands-on experience to reach an in-depth understanding of the programming concepts presented. Our preliminary analysis showed that while being an integral and rewarding part of courses, practical exercises bear the risk of overburdening students who are struggling with conceptual misunderstandings and unknown syntax. In this thesis, we develop, implement, and evaluate different interventions with the aim to improve the learning experience, sustainability, and success of online programming courses. Data from four programming MOOCs, with a total of over 60,000 participants, are employed to determine criteria for practical programming exercises best suited for a given audience.
Based on over five million executions and scoring runs from students' task submissions, we deduce exercise difficulties, students' patterns in approaching the exercises, and potential flaws in exercise descriptions as well as preparatory videos. The primary issue in online learning is that students face a social gap caused by their isolated physical situation. Each individual student usually learns alone in front of a computer and suffers from the absence of a pre-determined time structure as provided in traditional school classes. Furthermore, online learning usually presses students into a one-size-fits-all curriculum, which presents the same content to all students, regardless of their individual needs and learning styles. Any means of a personalization of content or individual feedback regarding problems they encounter are mostly ruled out by the discrepancy between the number of learners and the number of instructors. This results in a high demand for self-motivation and determination of MOOC participants. Social distance exists between individual students as well as between students and course instructors. It decreases engagement and poses a threat to learning success. Within this research, we approach the identified issues within MOOCs and suggest scalable technical solutions, improving social interaction and balancing content difficulty.
Our contributions include situational interventions, approaches for personalizing educational content as well as concepts for fostering collaborative problem-solving. With these approaches, we reduce counterproductive struggles and create a universal improvement for future programming MOOCs. We evaluate our approaches and methods in detail to improve programming courses for students as well as instructors and to advance the state of knowledge in online education.
Data gathered from our experiments show that receiving peer feedback on one's programming problems improves overall course scores by up to 17%. Merely the act of phrasing a question about one's problem improved overall scores by about 14%. The rate of students reaching out for help was significantly improved by situational just-in-time interventions. Request for Comment interventions increased the share of students asking for help by up to 158%. Data from our four MOOCs further provide detailed insight into the learning behavior of students. We outline additional significant findings with regard to student behavior and demographic factors. Our approaches, the technical infrastructure, the numerous educational resources developed, and the data collected provide a solid foundation for future research.MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) ermöglichen es jedem Interessierten sich in verschiedenen Fachrichtungen online weiterzubilden. Sie fördern die persönliche individuelle Entwicklung und ermöglichen lebenslanges Lernen auch dort, wo geeignete Lehrer nicht verfügbar sind. Unsere Gesellschaft befindet sich derzeit in der sogenannten "digitalen Transformation". Von vielen Arbeitnehmern werden in diesem Zusammenhang zunehmend Fähigkeiten wie abstraktes Denken und logisches Schlussfolgern erwartet. Das Erlernen einer Programmiersprache ist eine geeignete Möglichkeit, diese Fähigkeiten zu erlangen. Obwohl Programmieren als geistige Disziplin angesehen wird, ist es zu einem gewissen Grad auch ein Handwerk, bei dem sich das individuelle Können insbesondere durch stetige praktische Anwendung entwickelt. Um Programmierkenntnisse effektiv in einem MOOC zu vermitteln, sollten daher praktische Aufgaben von vornherein in den Lehrstoff des Kurses integriert werden, um die vorgestellten Konzepte geeignet zu vertiefen und zu festigen. Neben den positiven Aspekten
für die Lernenden weisen praktische Programmieraufgaben jedoch auch ein erhöhtes Frustpotential auf. Kryptische Fehlermeldungen und teils unbekannte Syntax überfordern insbesondere diejenigen Teilnehmer, welche zusätzlich mit konzeptionellen Missverständnissen zu kämpfen haben.
Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit entwickeln und analysieren wir mehrere Interventionsmöglichkeiten um die Lernerfahrung und den Lernerfolg von Teilnehmern in Programmier-MOOCs zu verbessern. Daten von über 60.000 Teilnehmern aus vier Programmier-MOOCs bilden die Grundlage für eine Analyse von Kriterien für geeignete Programmieraufgaben für spezifische Teilnehmergruppen. Auf Basis von 5 Millionen Codeausführungen von Teilnehmern leiten wir Schwachstellen in Aufgaben und typische Herangehensweisen der Teilnehmer ab. Die Hauptschwierigkeit beim Lernen in einer virtuellen Umgebung ist die durch physische Isolation hervorgerufene soziale Entkopplung. Jeder Teilnehmer lernt alleine vor einem Bildschirm, ein gemeinsamer Stundenplan wie im klassischen Schulunterricht fehlt. Weiterhin präsentieren bestehende online Kurse den Teilnehmern in der Regel lediglich universell einsetzbare Lerninhalte, welche in keiner Weise
auf die jeweiligen Bedürfnisse und Vorerfahrungen der individuellen Teilnehmer angepasst sind. Personalisierte Lerninhalte bzw. individuelles Feedback sind in MOOCs aufgrund der großen Anzahl an Teilnehmern und der nur kleinen Anzahl an Lehrenden oft nur schwer bzw. gar nicht zu realisieren. Daraus resultieren wiederum hohe Anforderungen an das individuelle Durchhaltevermögen und die Selbstmotivation der MOOC-Teilnehmer. Die soziale Entkopplung manifestiert sich sowohl zwischen den Teilnehmern untereinander als auch zwischen den Lehrenden und den Teilnehmern. Negative Folgen sind ein häufig verringertes Engagement und damit eine Gefährdung des Lernerfolgs. In dieser Arbeit schlagen wir als Gegenmaßnahme skalierbare technische Lösungen vor, um die soziale Interaktion zu verbessern und inhaltliche Schwierigkeiten zu überwinden.
Unsere wissenschaftlichen Beiträge umfassen situationsabhängige Interventionen, Ansätze zur Personalisierung von Lerninhalten, sowie Konzepte und Anreize zur Verbesserung der Kollaboration der Teilnehmer untereinander. Mit diesen Maßnahmen schaffen wir es, kontraproduktive Blockaden beim Lernen zu lösen und stellen damit einen universell einsetzbaren Ansatz zur Verbesserung von zukünftigen Progammier-MOOCs bereit.
Die aus unseren Experimenten gesammelten Daten zeigen, dass bei Programmierproblemen gewährtes Feedback von anderen Teilnehmern die Gesamtpunktzahl innerhalb des Teilnehmerfeldes durchschnittlich um bis zu 17% verbessert. Bereits das Formulieren des jeweiligen individuellen Problems verbesserte die Gesamtpunktzahl um etwa 14%. Durch situative Interventionen konnte weiterhin der Anteil der Teilnehmer, die nach Hilfe fragen, um bis zu 158% gesteigert werden. Die gesammelten Daten aus unseren vier MOOCs ermöglichen darüber hinaus detaillierte Einblicke in das Lernverhalten der Teilnehmer. Wir zeigen zusätzlich Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf das Verhalten der Teilnehmer und zu demografischen Faktoren auf. Die in dieser Arbeit beschriebenen Ansätze, die geschaffene technische Infrastruktur, das entworfene Lehrmaterial, sowie der umfangreiche gesammelte Datenbestand bilden darüber hinaus eine vielversprechende Grundlage für weitere zukünftige Forschung
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
In Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
