1,721,021 research outputs found
Commentary: Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Lesions Requires Advanced Physician Skills
No full textIncidence and predictors of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing proximal protected carotid artery stenting
No full textAims: Many studies have analysed the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but there are limited data relating to AKI risk in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of AKI in patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. Methods and results: We analysed 456 patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. A binomial multivariate logistic model was developed including patients' clinical and angiographic/procedural characteristics. AKI (defined as an sCr increase ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥1.5-fold sCr increase from baseline or more than 50% increase from baseline, within 48 hours post procedure) occurred in 155 patients (34%). AKI patients were more frequently affected by hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and anaemia, and presented lower renal function at baseline. Higher contrast volume to creatinine clearance ratio (2.40±1.44 vs. 2.08±1.15; p=0.01), lower post-procedural mean arterial pressure (MAP) (94.3±17.7 vs. 99.6±18.5 mmHg; p=0.003) and a more frequent post-procedural systolic pressure drop (∆SBP >50 mmHg) (23.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.01) were observed in the AKI group of patients. At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of AKI were ∆SBP >50 mmHg, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. Conclusions: AKI can occur quite frequently after proximal protected CAS and is related to clinical and procedural features. These data should be confirmed in larger registries or randomised trials
Drug-coated balloon in superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis
No full text: The femoropopliteal artery is one of the commonest sites of involvement in peripheral artery disease (PAD) leading to intermittent claudication and/or critical limb ischemia. Endovascular therapy for superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease has been recognized as a safe and efficient therapy and is recommended by current guidelines as the first-line approach. Although the widespread use of new-generation, self-expanding, nitinol stents in SFA stenosis has reduced the shortcomings associated with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), lumen renarrowing at the stented (in-stent restenosis - ISR) level still represents a relevant clinical problem, because of higher risk of recurrent ISR, occlusion and surgical revascularization compared to de-novo lesions. In this setting, different treatment options are available and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown good results in terms of safety and effectiveness. In this review we examine the results of different trials exploring the outcome of using DCBs for the treatment of SFA ISR. The available data demonstrate that SFA ISR can be safely treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a DCB, with a reduction in recurrent restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at least at 1 year after POBA. The consistent and positive results of different registries and randomized trials support the use of DCB to reduce SFA ISR recurrence
Abluminal biodegradable polymer-based Biolimus A9-eluting stent for the treatment of infrapopliteal arteries in critical limb ischemia: Long-term follow-up
No full textLinking lifestyle factors to cardiovascular risk through metabolomics: Insights from a large population of diabetic patients followed-up for 11 years
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
