1,721,105 research outputs found
Protección de la víctima del delito en el Sistema Penal Peruano
No full textNuestra preocupación por la participación de la víctima del delito en el procedimiento penal y en sentido general, la relación entre la víctima y el sistema de justicia penal, es un tema que ha suscitado un destacable interés en los últimos años. Después de varios siglos de exclusión y olvido, la víctima reaparece, en la actualidad, en el escenario de la justicia penal, como una preocupación central de la política criminal. Prueba de este interés resulta la necesidad de investigar y plantear soluciones, tanto en el Perú como en el extranjero, la inclusión del problema en el temario de reuniones científicas; los movimientos u organizaciones que trabajan o bregan por los derechos de las víctimas del delito; y, fundamentalmente, las reformas en el derecho positivo, nacional y comparado, deben girar en tomo a la víctima, su interés y protección. Se debe destacar que se trata de un problema del sistema penal, y, por fin, de los medios de realización que para alcanzar esos fines y cumplir esas tareas pone a su disposición el Derecho Procesal Penal, que en síntesis se trata de un problema político criminal común, al que debe dar solución el sistema en su conjunto. En ese sentido la reparación civil tradicionalmente ha sido vinculada con el proceso civil tendientes al logro de una indemnización y/o resarcimiento económico, esto evidentemente porque se le consideraba como una institución del Derecho civil; sin embargo la tendencia moderna es visualizar a la reparación civil como una modalidad de sanción del delito. Por ello las consecuencias juridicas no se agotan con la imposición de una pena o medida de seguridad al autor del delito, sino que también pueden surgir otras formas de ajusticiamiento de carácter civil reparador a la víctima directa e indirecta por el daño directo y/o reflejo que pudiera sufrir el petjudicado o sujeto pasivo del delito. En ese contexto la realización de un hecho delictivo puede generar tres tipos de consecuencias jurídicas, que son las de carácter estrictamente punitivo conformado por la pena privativa de la libertad y otras penas, luego tenemos las medidas de seguridad y finalmente encontramos las consecuencias de naturaleza civil, la misma que se ejecuta a través de la acción civil con los diversos mecanismos de ejecución, como es la medida cautelar.Tesi
Efecto de dos suplementos con distinto aporte proteico sobre la población y postura de colmenas en producción comercial
Full text linkEl objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el efecto de los suplementos proteicos
PROSISA-S® y PROSISA-P® sobre la postura y población de colmenas
comerciales durante cosecha de polen con trampa de polen. Se elaboraron los
suplementos PROSISA® con el software Animal-Space®. Para el estudio de
campo, se escogieron 18 colmenas comerciales instaladas en cultivo polifloral
(charamusco, eucalipto y maíz). El estudio de campo se realizó en Casique-La
Libertad-Perú, durante el mes diciembre del 2022. Las colonias recibieron tres
tratamientos (Control: sin suplemento proteico, PP: con suplemento proteico
PROSISA-P® y PS: con suplemento proteico PROSISA-S®). Se utilizó trampa de
polen en todas las colmenas para simular escasez nutricional. Según nuestros
resultados, PROSISA-S® de 18%PC obtuvo mayor consumo total (328.7g de
PROSISA-S® y 79.2g de PROSISA-P®), teniendo un consumo diario de 13.7g y
3.3g, respectivamente (p<0.0001). Del mismo modo, PROSISA-S® de 18%PC
incrementó significativamente (p =0.0151) el número de panales con cría (7.0 ± 0.35
cuadros), respecto a las colonias alimentadas con PROSISA-P® de 23%PC (5.5 ±
0.35 panales) y el tratamiento control (5.5 ± 0.35 panales) en colmenas comerciales
con trampa de polen. Adicionalmente, los tratamientos con suplementos proteicos
obtuvieron mayor número de cuadros poblados con abejas en colmenas
comerciales durante cosecha de polen (p=0.0003). PROSISA-S® de 18%PC
alcanzó 12.83 ± 0.70 panales poblados, PROSISA-P® de 23%PC logró 9.10 ± 0.70
panales poblados, y el tratamiento control 7.5 ± 0.70 panales poblados. Concluimos
que el empleo del suplemento proteico PROSISA-S® aumentó el consumo, la
postura y población de colmenas comerciales con trampa de polenThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the protein
supplements PROSISA-S® and PROSISA-P® on the posture and population of
commercial hives during pollen harvesting with pollen traps. PROSISA®
supplements were developed using Animal-Space® software. For the field study,
18 commercial hives installed in polyfloral crops (charamusco, eucalyptus and corn)
were chosen. The field study was carried out in Casique-La Libertad-Peru, during
the month of December 2022. The colonies received three treatments (Control:
without protein supplement, PP: with PROSISA-P® protein supplement and PS:
with PROSISA-S® protein supplement). Pollen trapping was used in all hives to
simulate nutritional shortage. According to our results, PROSISA-S® of 18%PC
obtained higher total consumption (328.7g of PROSISA-S® and 79.2g of PROSISA-
P®), having a daily consumption of 13.7g and 3.3g, respectively (p<0.0001).
Similarly, PROSISA-S® 18%PC significantly increased (p=0.0151) the number of
brood combs (7.0 ± 0.35 frames), with respect to colonies fed PROSISA-P® 23%PC
(5.5 ± 0.35 combs) and the control treatment (5.5 ± 0.35 combs) in commercial hives
with pollen traps. Additionally, the treatments with protein supplements obtained a
greater number of frames populated with bees in commercial hives during pollen
harvest (p=0.0003). PROSISA-S® 18%PC achieved 12.83 ± 0.70 frames populated,
PROSISA-P® 23%PC achieved 9.10 ± 0.70 frames populated, and the control
treatment achieved 7.5 ± 0.70 frames populated. We conclude that the use of the
protein supplement PROSISA-S® increased consumption, laying and population of
commercial hives with pollen trap.Tesi
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
