124,677 research outputs found
FIG. 3 in Proboscideans (Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Akkaşdağı, Turkey
FIG. 3. — Choerolophodon pentelici (Gaudry & Lartet, 1856), right lunar AK4-93, Akkaşdağı, Turolian; A, cranial view; B, distal view. Scale bar: 1 cm. Photo D. Serrette (MNHN).Published as part of Tassy, Pascal, 2005, Proboscideans (Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Akkaşdağı, Turkey, pp. 707-714 in Geodiversitas 27 (4) on page 709, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.466533
FIG. 1 in Proboscidea
FIG. 1. — Deinotherium cf. giganteum from West-Küçükçekmece, late Miocene, lower tusk MNHN.F.TRQ183: A, lateral view; B, hind view. Scale bar: 10 cm.Published as part of Tassy, Pascal, 2016, Proboscidea, pp. 261-271 in Geodiversitas 38 (2) on page 263, DOI: 10.5252/g2016n2a7, http://zenodo.org/record/520794
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
FIG. 3 in Proboscidea
FIG. 3. — Choerolophodon pentelici from West-Küçükçekmece, late Miocene: A, right M1-M2 MNHN.F.TRQ300; B, left?pathologic M3 or supernumerary molar, MNHN.F.TRQ302; C, right M3 MNHN.F.TRQ307; D, section of left M3 MNHN.F.TRQ298. All specimens are shown in occlusal view. Scale bar: 10 cm.Published as part of Tassy, Pascal, 2016, Proboscidea, pp. 261-271 in Geodiversitas 38 (2) on page 265, DOI: 10.5252/g2016n2a7, http://zenodo.org/record/520794
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
FIG. 10 in Albert Gaudry et les vertébrés fossiles du Luberon. Histoire d'une collection de référence
FIG. 10. — Gazella deperdita Gervais in Gervais & Serres, 1847, crâne MNHN.F.LUB681 Luberon (Miocène supérieur): A, vue latérale gauche; B idem, reproduit de Gaudry (1873: pl. 11, fig. 1). Cliché L. Cazes (MNHN). Échelle: 5 cm.Published as part of Pernègre, Vincent & Tassy, Pascal, 2014, Albert Gaudry et les vertébrés fossiles du Luberon. Histoire d'une collection de référence, pp. 623-667 in Geodiversitas 36 (4) on page 639, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a5, http://zenodo.org/record/453867
FIG. 8 in Albert Gaudry et les vertébrés fossiles du Luberon. Histoire d'une collection de référence
FIG. 8. — Hipparion prostylum Gervais, 1849, m3 gauche MNHN.F.LUB7, Luberon (Miocène supérieur): A, vue vestibulaire; B, idem reproduit de Gaudry (1873: pl. 6, fig. 8); la colonnette (c.) est plus courte que sur la figure donnée par Gaudry, probablement cassée après l'illustration. Cliché L. Cazes (MNHN). Échelle: 1 cm.Published as part of Pernègre, Vincent & Tassy, Pascal, 2014, Albert Gaudry et les vertébrés fossiles du Luberon. Histoire d'une collection de référence, pp. 623-667 in Geodiversitas 36 (4) on page 637, DOI: 10.5252/g2014n4a5, http://zenodo.org/record/453867
Les animaux : extrait du "Tuhfat ikwan Ussafa" (cadeau des frères de la pureté) / traduit d'après la version hindoustanie, par M. Garcin de Tassy,...
Avec mode text
FIG. 5 in Temporal paralogy, cladograms, and the quality of the fossil record
FIG. 5. — Pectinate cladogram illustrating Pongidae relationships as currently understood; A, all nodes are temporally informative (orthologous). The age of diversification of Pan is more recent than the age of origin of (Homo, Pan); B, the addition of a fossil taxon (Homo neanderthalensis) defines a paralogous node and two new arrows of time (black arrows). Consequently the fit of ages of diversification of both Homo and Pan to stratigraphy is meaningless.Published as part of Bagils, René Zaragüeta, Lelièvre, Hervé & Tassy, Pascal, 2004, Temporal paralogy, cladograms, and the quality of the fossil record, pp. 381-389 in Geodiversitas 26 (3) on page 388, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.537435
FIG. 5 in Temporal paralogy, cladograms, and the quality of the fossil record
FIG. 5. — Pectinate cladogram illustrating Pongidae relationships as currently understood; A, all nodes are temporally informative (orthologous). The age of diversification of Pan is more recent than the age of origin of (Homo, Pan); B, the addition of a fossil taxon (Homo neanderthalensis) defines a paralogous node and two new arrows of time (black arrows). Consequently the fit of ages of diversification of both Homo and Pan to stratigraphy is meaningless.Published as part of Bagils, René Zaragüeta, Lelièvre, Hervé & Tassy, Pascal, 2004, Temporal paralogy, cladograms, and the quality of the fossil record, pp. 381-389 in Geodiversitas 26 (3) on page 388, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.537435
- …
