1,721,015 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Advanced 3D seismic hazard analysis for active compression in the Adriatic Thrust Zone, Italy

    No full text
    The probabilistic seismic hazard assessment contains two ingredients: (1) the seismic source model with earthquake rates and rupture parameters for specification of the statistical distribution of earthquakes in time and space and (2) the ground motion model, for estimation of ground shaking level at a site for each earthquake rupture. The selection of these models significantly impacts the resulting hazard maps, and it can be challenging, particularly in seismotectonic regions where overlapping structures, sited at different depths, coexist. Eastern Central Italy is a well-known active compressional environment of the central Mediterranean with a complex tectonic structure with a lithospheric double shear zone. In this study, we propose a seismic hazard assessment to analyze the contribution of these two shear zones as overlapping multi-depth seismogenic volumes to ground motion at a given hazard level. We specifically focus on selecting relevant and applicable parameters for earthquake rate modeling, emphasizing the importance of defining rate computation and rupture-depth parametrization in hazard analysis. To achieve this, we utilized a seismotectonic- and catalog-based 3D adaptive smoothed seismicity approach following the methodology given by (Pandolfi et al. in Seismol Res Lett 95: 1-11, 2023). Finally, we demonstrated how this innovative 3D approach can identify with high resolution the individual sources' contribution with particular attention to the depth location of structures that strongly influence the ground motion. Moreover, combining seismotectonic data with seismicity avoids the challenges associated with structures with scarce geologic, geodetic, or paleoseismological data. Our result provides detailed insights into the seismic hazard within the Adriatic Thrust Zone

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    A Testable Worldwide Earthquake Faulting Mechanism Model

    No full text
    In this article, we present a simple model to forecast global focal mechanisms. This model is based on a simple discrete counting distribution of the global centroid moment tensor catalog, and it also includes, using a Bayesian scheme, the a priori information from the Anderson theory of faulting. Our model is tested in hindcasting mode against independent data of global large earthquakes with Ms≥7⁠. We obtained statistically significant good agreement between model and data using consistency test, demonstrating that this simple model can satisfactorily forecast focal mechanisms at the global scale. The defined testing procedure can be used to test the model in prospective mode against future events. These forecasts may inform short‐ to long‐term hazard quantifications that require a finite source characterization, as well as real‐time source inversion algorithms.Published3577–35853T. Fisica dei terremoti e Sorgente SismicaJCR Journa

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    The effect of magnitude uncertainty on the Gutenberg–Richter b-value estimation and the magnitude–frequency distribution: ‘what hump?’

    No full text
    This article has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Journal International ©:The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.The uncertainties on magnitudes of the earthquakes have a negligible effect on the estimation of the Gutenberg–Richter b-value if these uncertainties have a homogeneous distribution, that is, the magnitude error is the same for all the earthquakes. Here, we show that a non-uniform error distribution can have a significant impact on the b-value estimation, and it generates a hump in the magnitude–frequency distribution. Through a simulation approach, we show when the bias in the estimation is large, when it can be neglected, and how it is possible to avoid it.Published907–9116T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremotoJCR Journa

    Back to the future: old methods for new estimation and test of the Gutenberg–Richter b-value for catalogues with variable completeness

    No full text
    This article has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Journal International ©: 2021 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.In this short paper we show how to use the classical maximum likelihood estimation procedure for the b-value of the Gutenberg–Richter law for catalogues with different levels of completeness. With a simple correction, that is subtracting the relative completeness level to each magnitude, it becomes possible to use the classical approach. Moreover, this correction allows to adopt the testing procedures, initially made for catalogues with a single level of completeness, for catalogues with different levels of completeness too.Published337–3396T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremotoJCR Journa

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore